Fung Jasmine L F, Yu Mullin H C, Huang Shushu, Chung Claudia C Y, Chan Marcus C Y, Pajusalu Sander, Mak Christopher C Y, Hui Vivian C C, Tsang Mandy H Y, Yeung Kit San, Lek Monkol, Chung Brian H Y
Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510 USA.
NPJ Genom Med. 2020 Sep 10;5(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41525-020-00144-x. eCollection 2020.
Exome sequencing (ES) has become one of the important diagnostic tools in clinical genetics with a reported diagnostic rate of 25-58%. Many studies have illustrated the diagnostic and immediate clinical impact of ES. However, up to 75% of individuals remain undiagnosed and there is scarce evidence supporting clinical utility beyond a follow-up period of >1 year. This is a 3-year follow-up analysis to our previous publication by Mak et al. ( 3:19, 2018), to evaluate the long-term clinical utility of ES and the diagnostic potential of exome reanalysis. The diagnostic yield of the initial study was 41% (43/104). Exome reanalysis in 46 undiagnosed individuals has achieved 12 new diagnoses. The additional yield compared with the initial analysis was at least 12% (increased from 41% to at least 53%). After a median follow-up period of 3.4 years, change in clinical management was observed in 72.2% of the individuals (26/36), leading to positive change in clinical outcome in four individuals (11%). There was a minimum healthcare cost saving of HKD$152,078 (USD$19,497; €17,282) annually for these four individuals. There were a total of six pregnancies from five families within the period. Prenatal diagnosis was performed in four pregnancies; one fetus was affected and resulted in termination. None of the parents underwent preimplantation genetic diagnosis. This 3-year follow-up study demonstrated the long-term clinical utility of ES at individual, familial and health system level, and the promising diagnostic potential of subsequent reanalysis. This highlights the benefits of implementing ES and regular reanalysis in the clinical setting.
外显子组测序(ES)已成为临床遗传学中的重要诊断工具之一,报告的诊断率为25%-58%。许多研究已经阐明了ES的诊断价值及其对临床的直接影响。然而,高达75%的个体仍未得到诊断,并且几乎没有证据支持在超过1年的随访期之外的临床实用性。这是对Mak等人(2018年3月19日)之前发表的文章进行的一项为期3年的随访分析,以评估ES的长期临床实用性以及外显子组重新分析的诊断潜力。初始研究的诊断率为41%(43/104)。对46名未确诊个体进行的外显子组重新分析又获得了12个新诊断。与初始分析相比,额外的诊断率至少为12%(从41%提高到至少53%)。在中位随访期3.4年后,72.2%的个体(26/36)的临床管理发生了变化,导致4名个体(11%)的临床结局出现积极变化。这4名个体每年至少节省医疗费用152,078港元(19,497美元;17,282欧元)。在此期间,五个家庭共有六次怀孕。四次怀孕进行了产前诊断;一名胎儿受影响并导致终止妊娠。没有父母进行植入前基因诊断。这项为期3年的随访研究证明了ES在个体、家庭和卫生系统层面的长期临床实用性,以及后续重新分析的可观诊断潜力。这突出了在临床环境中实施ES和定期重新分析的益处。