• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前锥切术是否能提高早期宫颈癌的无病生存率?

Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer?

机构信息

Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, APHP. Centre, European Georges-Pompidou Hospital, 20, rue Leblanc, 75908 Cedex 15, Paris, France.

Faculty of Medicine, Paris University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;303(1):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05798-7. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-020-05798-7
PMID:32964259
Abstract

PURPOSE

Ever since the recent findings showing the lack of benefit of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open surgery in early-stage cervical cancer, gynecologists have tried to explain these results. The primary objective of our study was to assess the impact of pre-operative conization on disease-free survival (DFS) in early-stage cervical cancer. The secondary objective was to analyze the peri-operative morbidity associated with a pre-operative conization.

METHODS

All patients undergoing a surgical management for early-stage squamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma cervical cancer (IA1, IA2, IB1 and IB2 FIGO 2018) at a French university hospital from 2004 to 2018 were retrospectively included. We examined the association between conization and DFS using a Cox regression model. We also analyzed the morbidity associated with pre-operative conization.

RESULTS

48.4% (44/91) of the patients had a pre-operative conization (defined by a conization up to 90 days prior to surgery). 86.8% underwent MIS. There was a non-significant increase in the DFS with one patient presenting a recurrence in the conization group (2.3%) and six (12.8%) in the no conization group (log rank = 0.09). In univariate analysis, conization, definitive FIGO stage and pre-operative tumor size were associated with DFS (p < 0.2). Only pre-operative tumor size was significantly associated with DFS in multivariate analysis. There was a non-significant increase of adverse events in the conization group (43.2% in the conization group versus 23.4%, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Conization, through a reduction of tumor size, could improve DFS. Carefully selected patients could still benefit from minimally invasive surgery.

摘要

目的

自从最近的研究结果表明微创外科(MIS)与早期宫颈癌的开放性手术相比没有益处以来,妇科医生一直试图解释这些结果。我们研究的主要目的是评估术前锥切术对早期宫颈癌无病生存(DFS)的影响。次要目的是分析与术前锥切术相关的围手术期发病率。

方法

回顾性纳入 2004 年至 2018 年期间在法国一家大学医院接受手术治疗的早期宫颈鳞癌或腺癌(FIGO 2018 分期 IA1、IA2、IB1 和 IB2)的所有患者。我们使用 Cox 回归模型检查锥切术与 DFS 之间的关系。我们还分析了术前锥切术相关的发病率。

结果

48.4%(44/91)的患者有术前锥切术(定义为在手术前 90 天内进行锥切术)。86.8%行 MIS。在锥切组有 1 例患者出现复发(2.3%),而在未行锥切组有 6 例(12.8%)DFS 无显著增加(对数秩检验=0.09)。单因素分析显示,锥切术、明确的 FIGO 分期和术前肿瘤大小与 DFS 相关(p<0.2)。多因素分析显示,只有术前肿瘤大小与 DFS 显著相关。锥切组不良事件发生率略有增加(锥切组为 43.2%,而非锥切组为 23.4%,p=0.06)。

结论

锥切术通过缩小肿瘤体积,可能改善 DFS。精心选择的患者仍可能从微创外科中受益。

相似文献

1
Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer?术前锥切术是否能提高早期宫颈癌的无病生存率?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;303(1):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05798-7. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
2
The efficacy of pre-operative conization in patients undergoing surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.术前锥切术治疗早期宫颈癌患者的疗效:荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;49(11):106995. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.106995. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
3
Cervical conization before primary radical hysterectomy has a protective effect on disease recurrence in early cervical cancer: A two-center matched cohort study according to surgical approach.原发性根治性子宫切除术前行宫颈锥切术对早期宫颈癌疾病复发具有保护作用:一项根据手术方式进行的两中心配对队列研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Mar;164(3):535-542. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.023. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
4
Preoperative Conization May Have a Positive Impact on Survival in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Study.术前锥切术可能对早期宫颈癌的生存有积极影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Oncol Res Treat. 2021;44(12):710-718. doi: 10.1159/000519646. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
5
Conization before radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A Korean multicenter study (COBRA-R).根治性子宫切除术前行锥切术治疗早期宫颈癌患者的多中心研究(COBRA-R)。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jun;173:88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.015. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
6
Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size? (MISAFE): Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA-1003).对于肿瘤直径≤2cm 的宫颈癌患者,微创根治性手术安全吗?(MISAFE):妇科肿瘤研究人员合作协作研究(GORILLA-1003)。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Sep;176:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
7
The clinical outcome of patients with stage Ia1 and Ia2 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) study.子宫颈Ia1期和Ia2期鳞状细胞癌患者的临床结局:一项合作特别工作组(CTF)研究
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24(6):513-6.
8
Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.早期宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术后复发的预测因素:一项多机构研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.508. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
9
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.2018 年 FIGO 分期中微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的结局比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
Protective effect of pre-operative conization in patients undergoing surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer.术前锥切术对行手术治疗的早期宫颈癌患者的保护作用。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jul;166(1):57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.05.014. Epub 2022 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma, with or without Prior Cervical Excision Procedure.早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的结局,无论是否进行过先前的宫颈切除术。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 29;16(11):2051. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112051.
2
Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Treated Cervical Cancer with No Residual Disease on Hysterectomy Specimen: A 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) Working Group Study.子宫切除术后标本无残留疾病的宫颈癌的肿瘤学结局:4C(加拿大宫颈癌合作组)工作组研究。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 6;30(2):1977-1985. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30020153.
3
The Role of Conization before Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer including High Risk Factors of Recurrence: Propensity Score Matching.

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌患者术前锥切与复发风险的多中心研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jan;28(1):117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
2
Comprehensive analysis of patient outcome after local recurrence of locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiation and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.局部晚期宫颈癌患者同步放化疗联合影像引导自适应近距离治疗后局部复发的综合预后分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jun;157(3):644-648. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
3
根治性子宫切除术前行宫颈锥切术在包含复发高危因素的宫颈癌中的作用:倾向评分匹配法
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 10;14(16):3863. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163863.
4
Can Conization Specimens Predict Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer? A SENTICOL Group Study.宫颈锥切标本能否预测早期宫颈癌前哨淋巴结状态?SENTICOL 组研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 29;13(21):5423. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215423.
5
Villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.宫颈腺样腺癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Aug;304(2):317-327. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06077-9. Epub 2021 May 25.
Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
早期宫颈癌微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术不良事件发生率的随机对照研究结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):249.e1-249.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.036. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
4
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.对比微创根治性子宫切除术和传统开放性根治性子宫切除术在 Ib1 期-IIa2 期宫颈癌患者中的生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
5
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
6
Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的生存情况。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1905-1914. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
7
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Identification of a low risk population for parametrial invasion in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.识别早期宫颈癌患者中发生宫旁浸润的低危人群。
J Transl Med. 2018 Jun 14;16(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1531-6.
9
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part I: National cancer statistics.《国家癌症报告:第一部分:全国癌症统计数据》
Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;124(13):2785-2800. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31551. Epub 2018 May 22.
10
Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.训练水平对宫颈锥切术时宫颈锥大小及切缘状态的影响:一项回顾性研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;297(6):1517-1523. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4761-1. Epub 2018 Mar 30.