Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Pediatr Int. 2021 May;63(5):561-564. doi: 10.1111/ped.14476. Epub 2021 May 7.
Our peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) management plan for neonates previously included routine inspection for swelling and induration of the insertion site of a PICC using palpation. However, we discontinued routine palpation from July 13, 2018, owing to a peculiarly high incidence of PICC-related phlebitis. The aim of this study was to prove that routine palpation was the cause of PICC-related phlebitis.
We retrospectively reviewed medical records of infants who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and underwent PICC placement from January 2018 to January 2019. The infants were classified into palpating (before July 13, 2018) and non-palpating (after or on July 13, 2018) groups. We analyzed and compared the incidence of PICC-related phlebitis in the two groups.
Phlebitis related to PICC was more frequently observed in the palpating group (10/29 infants, 34.5%) than in the non-palpating group (1/31, 3.2%) (P = 0.002). After discontinuation of routine palpating in PICC management, the frequency of non-scheduled removal of the PICC due to phlebitis decreased. The indwelling period was significantly longer in the non-palpating group than in the palpating group.
Our results suggest that mechanical stimulation using palpation of the insertion site was the cause of PICC-related phlebitis, resulting in early non-scheduled removal.
我们之前的新生儿经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)管理方案包括常规触诊以检查 PICC 插入部位的肿胀和硬结。然而,自 2018 年 7 月 13 日起,由于 PICC 相关性静脉炎的发生率异常高,我们停止了常规触诊。本研究旨在证明常规触诊是 PICC 相关性静脉炎的原因。
我们回顾性分析了 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月在新生儿重症监护病房接受 PICC 置管的婴儿的病历。将婴儿分为触诊(2018 年 7 月 13 日前)和非触诊(2018 年 7 月 13 日后或当日)组。我们分析并比较了两组 PICC 相关性静脉炎的发生率。
触诊组(29 例婴儿中有 10 例,34.5%)PICC 相关性静脉炎的发生率明显高于非触诊组(31 例婴儿中有 1 例,3.2%)(P=0.002)。停止 PICC 管理中的常规触诊后,因静脉炎而非计划性拔管的频率降低。非触诊组的留置时间明显长于触诊组。
我们的结果表明,触诊插入部位的机械刺激是 PICC 相关性静脉炎的原因,导致早期非计划性拔管。