Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Université Côte d'Azur Medical Center, Pasteur Hospital, Nice, France.
Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Aix Marseille University, APHM, INSERM, Institute for Neuroscience Systems, UMR 1106, Marseille, France.
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jan;14(1):163-169. doi: 10.1111/cts.12883. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
The recent empirical use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) revived the interest in its cardiac toxicity, increasingly sidelined over time. We aimed to assess and compare the profile of cardiac adverse drug reactions (CADRs) associated with HCQ before and during COVID-19. We performed a retrospective comparative observational study using the French Pharmacovigilance network database between 1985 and May 2020 to assess all postmarketing CADRs associated with HCQ notified before COVID-19 in its approved indications for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis (preCOV), and those concerning its empirical use in COVID-19 (COV). Eighty-five CADR in preCOV were compared with 141 CADRs in COV. The most common CADR of preCOV were cardiomyopathies (42.4%) and conduction disorders (28.2%), both statistically more frequent than in COV (P < 0.001). COV notifications significantly highlighted repolarization and ventricular rhythm disorders (78.0%, P < 0.001) as well as sinus bradycardias (14.9%, P = 0.01) as compared with preCOV. Estimated incidence of CADR was significantly higher among patients exposed to off-label use of HCQ in COVID-19 (2.9%) than before COVID-19 in its approved indications (0.01%, P < 0.001). The use of HCQ in COVID-19 sheds a new light on the spectrum of its cardiac toxicity. This fosters the value of a closer monitoring of all patients treated with HCQ, regardless of its indication, and the importance of an update of its summary of product characteristics.
羟氯喹(HCQ)在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中的近期经验性应用重新引起了人们对其心脏毒性的关注,这种关注随着时间的推移逐渐被忽视。我们旨在评估和比较 COVID-19 之前和期间与 HCQ 相关的心脏不良药物反应(CADR)的特征。我们使用法国药物警戒网络数据库,在 1985 年至 2020 年 5 月期间进行了一项回顾性比较观察性研究,以评估在 COVID-19 之前在其批准的狼疮和类风湿关节炎适应证(前 COV)中报告的所有上市后与 HCQ 相关的 CADR,以及在 COVID-19 中的经验性使用相关的 CADR(COV)。将前 COV 中的 85 个 CADR 与 COV 中的 141 个 CADR 进行了比较。前 COV 中最常见的 CADR 是心肌病(42.4%)和传导障碍(28.2%),两者在统计学上均比 COV 更为常见(P<0.001)。COV 通知显著强调了复极和心室节律障碍(78.0%,P<0.001)以及窦性心动过缓(14.9%,P=0.01)比前 COV 更为常见。与 COVID-19 中 HCQ 的标签外使用相比,在 COVID-19 之前在其批准的适应证中(0.01%),HCQ 暴露患者的 CADR 发生率估计明显更高(P<0.001)。在 COVID-19 中使用 HCQ 为其心脏毒性谱提供了新的认识。这促进了对所有接受 HCQ 治疗的患者进行更密切监测的价值,无论其适应证如何,以及更新其产品特性摘要的重要性。