Yukhno O, Yemelianov V, Pavlykivskyi V, Kalashnyk O, Sivash O
1Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs; Ukraine.
2Kharkiv University; Ukraine.
Georgian Med News. 2020 Jul-Aug(304-305):189-194.
The aim of the article is a comprehensive analysis of the possibility of realizing the human right to health protection based on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights.; To achieve this goal, general scientific and special methods of cognition were used, chosen taking into account the purpose of the work. The epistemological method was used to study the general prerequisites, means and patterns of development of mechanisms for protecting the human right to health protection, including in the ECHR. The dialectical method - when searching for the right approaches to solving theoretical and legal problems that arise in the legal regulation of the human right to health protection. Using the method of legal analysis, the scope of medical human rights is determined. The statistical method was used to study the dynamics in the processes associated with the realization of the human right to health at the ECHR. The comparative legal method made it possible to compare the norms of the national legislation of Ukraine and other countries with the practice of the ECHR in the field of ensuring the human right to health protection. The structural method is used to study the types of medical human rights that are protected by the ECHR.; The article concludes that the right to health protection ensures the natural existence of an individual, is of great importance in the system of rights, and is an integral, natural achievement of mankind. It is emphasized that it is advisable for states to pay attention to the practice of the ECHR to ensure medical human rights in order to prevent violations of these rights and provide effective mechanisms for their implementation. The article notes that the ECHR does not recognize abortion and euthanasia as violations of the Convention. It is noted that the practice of the ECHR in dealing with cases of violation of the human right to health has become a guideline for health care reform in most countries of the European Union and has made it possible to achieve significant changes in the work of healthcare systems for the better. It has been determined that the main task of the ECHR and international organizations in resolving issues related to the protection of the human right to health care is the observance by the participating states of the Convention in this area.
本文的目的是基于欧洲人权法院的实践,对实现健康保护人权的可能性进行全面分析。;为实现这一目标,采用了一般科学和特殊的认知方法,这些方法是根据工作目的选择的。认识论方法用于研究健康保护人权机制发展的一般前提、手段和模式,包括在欧洲人权法院的情况。辩证方法——在寻找解决健康保护人权法律规制中出现的理论和法律问题的正确方法时使用。运用法律分析方法确定医疗人权的范围。统计方法用于研究欧洲人权法院在实现健康人权过程中相关进程的动态。比较法律方法使人们能够将乌克兰和其他国家的国内立法规范与欧洲人权法院在确保健康保护人权领域的实践进行比较。结构方法用于研究欧洲人权法院保护的医疗人权类型。;文章得出结论,健康保护权确保个人的自然生存,在权利体系中具有重要意义,是人类不可或缺的自然成就。强调各国宜关注欧洲人权法院确保医疗人权的实践,以防止这些权利受到侵犯并提供有效的实施机制。文章指出,欧洲人权法院不认为堕胎和安乐死是违反《公约》的行为。注意到欧洲人权法院处理侵犯健康人权案件的实践已成为欧盟大多数国家医疗改革的指导方针,并使医疗系统的工作取得了显著改善。已确定欧洲人权法院和国际组织在解决与健康保护人权相关问题时的主要任务是参与国在该领域遵守《公约》。