Deshko L, Bysaga Y, Zaborovskyy V
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics.
Uzhhorod National University, Ukraine.
Georgian Med News. 2019 Sep(294):165-171.
The article explores the issue of human rights protection in the field of health care by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. The decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of K. G. Ustimenko (1997), the case of paid medical services (1998), the case of free medical care (2002), the case of judicial control over the hospitalization of incapacitated persons into psychiatric institute are analyzed (2016), as well as the new legislation of Ukraine in the light of radical reform in the healthcare sector. Attention is drawn to the principle of friendly attitude to international law, constitutional complaint, legal positions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the above-mentioned cases and the prospect of their application into the development of new legislation of Ukraine in the context of radical reform of the health care system of Ukraine. It is emphasized that the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, with regard of peculiarities of the national legislature, can serve as a source of inspiration for the courts of other countries. The purpose of the article is to specify the role and place of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the system of judicial protection of human and citizen rights, to determine the prospects of applying the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine within the development of new legislation of Ukraine in the light of radical reform of the health care system. The object of the study is the social relations that arise during protection of human rights in the field of health care by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. The methodological basis of the research are general and special methods of scientific knowledge (formal-logical method, comparative-legal, structural-logical). As a result of the conducted research, the role and place of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the system of judicial protection of human and citizen rights, the role of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of K. G. Ustimenko, the case of paid medical services, the case of free medical care, the case of judicial control over hospitalization of incapacitated persons into psychiatric institution in the formation and development of domestic constitutional proceedings are defined. It is emphasized that the introduction of the constitutional complaint concept (institution) contributed to the improvement of the national mechanism of human rights protection in the field of health care. Conflicts of constitutional regulation of the human right to free medical care have been identified, and proposals have been worked out regarding possible ways and methods to eliminate them.
本文探讨了乌克兰宪法法院在医疗保健领域的人权保护问题。分析了乌克兰宪法法院在K.G.乌斯季缅科案（1997年）、有偿医疗服务案（1998年）、免费医疗案（2002年）、对无行为能力者被送往精神病院住院情况的司法控制案（2016年）中的裁决，以及乌克兰新立法与医疗保健部门激进改革的关系。文章关注乌克兰宪法法院对国际法的友好态度原则、宪法申诉、在上述案件中的法律立场，以及在乌克兰医疗保健系统激进改革背景下将其应用于乌克兰新立法发展的前景。强调乌克兰宪法法院的法律立场，鉴于国家立法的特殊性，可为其他国家的法院提供灵感来源。本文的目的是明确乌克兰宪法法院在公民权利和人权司法保护体系中的作用和地位，确定在乌克兰医疗保健系统激进改革背景下，将乌克兰宪法法院的法律立场应用于乌克兰新立法发展的前景。研究对象是乌克兰宪法法院在医疗保健领域保护人权过程中产生的社会关系。研究的方法论基础是科学知识的一般方法和特殊方法（形式逻辑方法、比较法、结构逻辑方法）。研究结果明确了乌克兰宪法法院在公民权利和人权司法保护体系中的作用和地位，以及乌克兰宪法法院在K.G.乌斯季缅科案、有偿医疗服务案、免费医疗案、对无行为能力者被送往精神病院住院情况司法控制案中的裁决在国内宪法程序形成和发展中的作用。强调引入宪法申诉概念（制度）有助于改善医疗保健领域的国家人权保护机制。确定了免费医疗人权宪法规范中的冲突，并就消除这些冲突的可能途径和方法提出了建议。
