• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应电子健康记录进行卫生服务研究的机遇、陷阱和选择。

Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Alternatives in Adapting Electronic Health Records for Health Services Research.

机构信息

Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2021 Feb;41(2):133-142. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20954403. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X20954403
PMID:32969760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7878193/
Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) offer the potential to study large numbers of patients but are designed for clinical practice, not research. Despite the increasing availability of EHR data, their use in research comes with its own set of challenges. In this article, we describe some important considerations and potential solutions for commonly encountered problems when working with large-scale, EHR-derived data for health services and community-relevant health research. Specifically, using EHR data requires the researcher to define the relevant patient subpopulation, reliably identify the primary care provider, recognize the EHR as containing episodic (i.e., unstructured longitudinal) data, account for changes in health system composition and treatment options over time, understand that the EHR is not always well-organized and accurate, design methods to identify the same patient across multiple health systems, account for the enormous size of the EHR, and consider barriers to data access. Associations found in the EHR may be nonrepresentative of associations in the general population, but a clear understanding of the EHR-based associations can be enormously valuable to the process of improving outcomes for patients in learning health care systems. In the context of building 2 large-scale EHR-derived data sets for health services research, we describe the potential pitfalls of EHR data and propose some solutions for those planning to use EHR data in their research. As ever greater amounts of clinical data are amassed in the EHR, use of these data for research will become increasingly common and important. Attention to the intricacies of EHR data will allow for more informed analysis and interpretation of results from EHR-based data sets.

摘要

电子健康记录 (EHR) 具有研究大量患者的潜力,但它是为临床实践而设计的,而不是为研究设计的。尽管 EHR 数据越来越容易获得,但在研究中使用它们也带来了一系列自身的挑战。在本文中,我们描述了在使用大规模、源自 EHR 的数据进行卫生服务和与社区相关的健康研究时,通常遇到的问题的一些重要考虑因素和潜在解决方案。具体来说,使用 EHR 数据要求研究人员定义相关的患者亚群,可靠地识别初级保健提供者,认识到 EHR 包含间歇性(即非结构化的纵向)数据,考虑随着时间的推移卫生系统组成和治疗选择的变化,了解 EHR 并不总是组织良好和准确的,设计方法以识别多个卫生系统中的相同患者,考虑 EHR 的巨大规模,并考虑数据访问的障碍。EHR 中发现的关联可能与一般人群中的关联不具有代表性,但对 EHR 中基于关联的清晰理解对于改善学习型医疗保健系统中患者的治疗结果过程具有巨大价值。在构建 2 个大型 EHR 衍生数据用于卫生服务研究的背景下,我们描述了 EHR 数据的潜在陷阱,并为那些计划在其研究中使用 EHR 数据的人提出了一些解决方案。随着越来越多的临床数据在 EHR 中积累,这些数据在研究中的使用将变得越来越普遍和重要。对 EHR 数据的复杂性的关注将允许对基于 EHR 的数据集的结果进行更明智的分析和解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd36/7878193/64d3a8a15553/nihms-1619923-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd36/7878193/64d3a8a15553/nihms-1619923-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd36/7878193/64d3a8a15553/nihms-1619923-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Alternatives in Adapting Electronic Health Records for Health Services Research.适应电子健康记录进行卫生服务研究的机遇、陷阱和选择。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Feb;41(2):133-142. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20954403. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
2
Adult patient access to electronic health records.成年患者获取电子健康记录。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD012707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012707.pub2.
3
Challenges in patient safety improvement research in the era of electronic health records.电子病历时代患者安全改进研究面临的挑战。
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Dec;4(4):285-290. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
4
Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care.在整合行为健康与初级保健的实践中观察到的电子健康记录挑战、变通方法及解决方案
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150133.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Use of Epic Electronic Health Record System for Health Care Research: Scoping Review.利用 Epic 电子健康记录系统进行医疗保健研究:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 15;25:e51003. doi: 10.2196/51003.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Association between Having a Regular Health Provider and Access to Services Linked to Electronic Health Records.拥有固定医疗服务提供者与获取与电子健康记录相关服务之间的关联。
Hosp Top. 2019 Jan;97(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2018.1551102. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
9
Extracting Electronic Health Record Data in a Practice-Based Research Network: Processes to Support Translational Research across Diverse Practice Organizations.在基于实践的研究网络中提取电子健康记录数据:支持跨不同实践组织进行转化研究的流程。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Mar 29;4(2):1206. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1206. eCollection 2016.
10
We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England.我们痛苦,但我们更好了:在英国一家精神卫生医院实施电子健康记录系统的案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec 31;12:484. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-484.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated Extraction of Mortality Information From Publicly Available Sources Using Large Language Models: Development and Evaluation Study.使用大语言模型从公开可用来源自动提取死亡率信息:开发与评估研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 18;27:e71113. doi: 10.2196/71113.
2
Patient and clinician acceptability of automated extraction of social drivers of health from clinical notes in primary care.基层医疗中从临床记录自动提取健康社会驱动因素的患者和临床医生可接受性
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):855-865. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf046.
3
From Basic to Extra Features: Hypergraph Transformer Pretrain-then-Finetuning for Balanced Clinical Predictions on EHR.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring prevalence and incidence of chronic conditions in claims and electronic health record databases.在理赔和电子健康记录数据库中测量慢性病的患病率和发病率。
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 17;11:1-15. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S181242. eCollection 2019.
2
Making Neighborhood-Disadvantage Metrics Accessible - The Neighborhood Atlas.让邻里劣势指标易于获取——邻里地图集。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2456-2458. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1802313.
3
Possible Sources of Bias in Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data Use and Reuse.基层医疗电子健康记录数据使用与再利用中可能存在的偏差来源。
从基本特征到额外特征:用于电子健康记录平衡临床预测的超图变换器预训练后微调
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2024 Jun;248:182-197.
4
Neighbourhood socioeconomic position, prenatal care and fulfilment of postpartum permanent contraception: Findings from a multisite cohort study.邻里社会经济地位、产前护理与产后长效避孕措施的落实情况:一项多中心队列研究的结果
Reprod Female Child Health. 2024 Mar;3(1). doi: 10.1002/rfc2.64. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
5
Data gaps and opportunities for modeling cancer health equity.癌症健康公平性建模的数据差距和机会。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023 Nov 8;2023(62):246-254. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad025.
6
Challenges and Opportunities for Data Science in Women's Health.妇女健康数据科学面临的挑战与机遇。
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2023 Aug 10;6:23-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-105958. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
7
A Path to Real-World Evidence in Critical Care Using Open-Source Data Harmonization Tools.一条利用开源数据协调工具获取重症监护领域真实世界证据的途径。
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Apr 3;5(4):e0893. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000893. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Receipt of Targeted Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.转移性结直肠癌患者接受靶向治疗与生存结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250030. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50030.
9
Personalized Disease Prevention (PDP): study protocol for a cluster-randomized clinical trial.个性化疾病预防(PDP):一项整群随机临床试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Oct 22;23(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06750-7.
10
Evaluating and Modeling Neighborhood Diversity and Health Using Electronic Health Records.利用电子健康记录评估和建模邻里多样性与健康。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Nov;42(8):1027-1040. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221123569.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 29;20(5):e185. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9134.
4
A new initiative on precision medicine.一项关于精准医学的新倡议。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):793-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
5
Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.电子健康记录数据质量评估的方法和维度:为临床研究提供可重用性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):144-51. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
6
Importance of accurately identifying disease in studies using electronic health records.在使用电子健康记录的研究中准确识别疾病的重要性。
BMJ. 2010 Aug 19;341:c4226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4226.
7
Prevalence of family history of breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer in a population-based study.一项基于人群的研究中乳腺癌、结直肠癌、前列腺癌和肺癌家族史的患病率。
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(7-8):495-503. doi: 10.1159/000294469. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
8
Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data.利用医生申报数据开发一种共病指数。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Dec;53(12):1258-67. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00256-0.