• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国医学研究人员关于开放获取和掠夺性期刊的实用建议。

Practical Advice for South Korean Medical Researchers Regarding Open-Access and Predatory Journals.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan;53(1):1-8. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.816. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

DOI:10.4143/crt.2020.816
PMID:32972041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7812024/
Abstract

In recent decades, the volume of scholarly literature worldwide has increased significantly, and open-access publishing has become commonplace. These changes are even more dominant in South Korea. Comparing the periods of 1981-2000 and 2001-2020, the number of medical articles produced in Korea increased by 16.8 times on the Web of Science platform (13,223 to 222,771 papers). Before 1990, almost no open-access articles were produced in South Korea, but in the last 10 years open-access publications came to account for almost 40% of all South Korean publications on Web of Science. Along with the expansion of literature and the development of open-access publishing, predatory journals that seek profit without conducting quality assurance have appeared and undermined the academic corpus. In this rapidly changing environment, medical researchers have begun contemplating publication standards. In this article, recent trends in academic publishing are examined from international and South Korean perspectives, and the significance of open-access publishing and recent changes are discussed. Practical methods that can be used to select legitimate publishers, including open-access journals, and identify predatory journals are also discussed.

摘要

近几十年来,全球学术文献的数量显著增加,开放获取出版已成为常态。这些变化在韩国更为明显。比较 1981-2000 年和 2001-2020 年两个时期,在 Web of Science 平台上,韩国发表的医学文章数量增加了 16.8 倍(从 13223 篇增加到 222771 篇)。1990 年前,韩国几乎没有开放获取的文章,但在过去 10 年里,开放获取出版物几乎占韩国在 Web of Science 上发表的所有文章的 40%。随着文献的扩展和开放获取出版的发展,出现了以盈利为目的而不进行质量保证的掠夺性期刊,破坏了学术体系。在这种快速变化的环境下,医学研究人员开始考虑出版标准。本文从国际和韩国的角度探讨了学术出版的最新趋势,并讨论了开放获取出版的意义和最近的变化。还讨论了一些实用的方法,可以用来选择合法的出版商,包括开放获取期刊,并识别掠夺性期刊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed9/7812024/9d00ea9215cf/crt-2020-816f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed9/7812024/26bf8aa578d8/crt-2020-816f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed9/7812024/9d00ea9215cf/crt-2020-816f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed9/7812024/26bf8aa578d8/crt-2020-816f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed9/7812024/9d00ea9215cf/crt-2020-816f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Practical Advice for South Korean Medical Researchers Regarding Open-Access and Predatory Journals.韩国医学研究人员关于开放获取和掠夺性期刊的实用建议。
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan;53(1):1-8. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.816. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
2
Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research.骨科学术研究中的掠夺性出版。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):e138. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01569.
3
Analysis of thirteen predatory publishers: a trap for eager-to-publish researchers.十三家掠夺性出版商分析:急于发表论文的研究人员的陷阱。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jan;34(1):157-162. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1358160. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
4
False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals.假金:安全浏览开放获取出版以避免掠夺性出版商和期刊。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):809-817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13483. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
5
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
6
What I learned from predatory publishers.我从掠夺性出版商那里学到的东西。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):273-278. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.029.
7
Predatory journals: a major threat in orthopaedic research.掠夺性期刊:矫形研究中的主要威胁。
Int Orthop. 2019 Mar;43(3):509-517. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4179-1. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
8
Avoiding predatory publishing for early career neurosurgeons: what should you know before you submit?避免掠夺性出版:投稿前你应该知道什么?
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jan;163(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04546-9. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
9
Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation.康复领域的掠夺性开放获取
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):1051-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals.在掠夺性期刊上发表文章的伦理问题。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):279-284. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating Country-Specific Perceptions of Predatory Journals and Their Impact on Scholarly Integrity: A Systematic Review.调查各国对掠夺性期刊的认知及其对学术诚信的影响:一项系统综述。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):e64674. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64674. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting the Term Predatory Open Access Publishing.重新审视“掠夺性开放获取出版”这一术语。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Apr 8;34(13):e99. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e99.
2
Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals.识别掠夺性或伪期刊。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):285-291. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.031.
3
What I learned from predatory publishers.我从掠夺性出版商那里学到的东西。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):273-278. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.029.
4
Predatory journals recruit fake editor.掠夺性期刊招募虚假编辑。
Nature. 2017 Mar 22;543(7646):481-483. doi: 10.1038/543481a.
5
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
6
Who's afraid of peer review?谁害怕同行评审?
Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):60-5. doi: 10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60.
7
An open access mandate for the National Institutes of Health.美国国立卫生研究院的开放获取授权。
Open Med. 2008;2(2):e39-41. Epub 2008 Apr 17.