Suppr超能文献

四个欧洲国家心血管药物价格比较。

Comparison of Cardiovascular Medicines Prices in Four European Countries.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy Bulgaria, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.

National Council on Pricing and Reimbursement of Medicinal Products, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;8:433. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00433. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to compare pricing methodologies at the manufacturer, wholesale, and retail levels, and to estimate the price differences of AT1-receptor blockers (sartans), Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors, and their fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) in four countries using similar methodologies: Slovakia, Greece, Bulgaria, and Romania (SK, GR, BG, and RO, respectively). The methodologies for manufacturer, wholesale, and retail price establishment have been compared using nationally implemented rules. Overlapping trademarks were established retrospectively on the manufacturer and retail levels in November 2017. The average price per tablet, percentage of price deviation, and statistically significant differences were calculated. The selected countries apply external reference pricing at the manufacturer level. A wide variation in the number of referent countries was observed (from 12 to 27). Despite the use of a regressive scale for price calculation, large variations between margins and value-added tax (VAT) are established, thus leading to different final medicine prices. This study found that medicine prices were lower in RO than in other selected countries. It was caused by the fact that 15 products had the lowest manufacturer price and 14 products had the lowest retail price in RO. Results of Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there were no significant differences between prices per tablet on the manufacturer and retail levels. In the group of fixed-dose combinations, ramipril/hydrochlorothiazide, and irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide showed more than 100% deviation. The prices of cardiovascular medicines differed within the observed countries. The differences in pricing methodologies (e.g., margins, VAT) at the national level did not significantly affect retail prices, as a low manufacturer price usually leads to a low retail price.

摘要

本研究旨在比较制造商、批发商和零售商层面的定价方法,并使用类似的方法在四个国家(斯洛伐克、希腊、保加利亚和罗马尼亚,分别简称 SK、GR、BG 和 RO)评估 AT1 受体阻滞剂(沙坦类)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂及其固定剂量复方制剂的价格差异。采用国家实施的规则比较制造商、批发商和零售价格的定价方法。2017 年 11 月,对制造商和零售层面的重叠商标进行了回溯性确定。计算了每片的平均价格、价格偏差百分比和具有统计学意义的差异。所选择的国家在制造商层面应用外部参考定价。观察到参照国家的数量存在很大差异(从 12 到 27)。尽管用于价格计算的是回归比例,但仍存在利润率和增值税之间的巨大差异,从而导致最终药品价格不同。本研究发现,RO 的药品价格低于其他选定国家。这是由于 RO 有 15 种产品的制造商价格最低,14 种产品的零售价格最低。Kruskal-Wallis 检验结果表明,制造商和零售商层面的每片价格没有显著差异。在固定剂量复方制剂中,雷米普利/氢氯噻嗪和厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪的偏差超过 100%。观察到的国家内心血管药物的价格存在差异。国家层面定价方法(如利润率、增值税)的差异并未显著影响零售价格,因为制造商的低价通常会导致零售价格降低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Cardiovascular Medicines Prices in Four European Countries.四个欧洲国家心血管药物价格比较。
Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;8:433. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00433. eCollection 2020.
2
Price comparison of high-cost originator medicines in European countries.欧洲国家高成本原研药的价格比较。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Apr;17(2):221-230. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1223543. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
8
Analysis of Medicine Prices in New Zealand and 16 European Countries.新西兰与16个欧洲国家药品价格分析。
Value Health. 2015 Jun;18(4):484-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
9
Drug affordability-potential tool for comparing illicit drug markets.药物可负担性-比较非法毒品市场的潜在工具。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jun;56:187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Cost-of-illness studies in nine Central and Eastern European countries.九个中东欧国家的疾病成本研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):155-172. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01066-x. Epub 2019 May 18.
5
Drug Policy in Romania.罗马尼亚的毒品政策。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2018 Sep;16:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2017.11.003. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
7
Drug Policy in Bulgaria.保加利亚的毒品政策。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2017 Sep;13:50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
9
Affordability of medicines in the European Union.欧盟药品的可负担性。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 27;12(2):e0172753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172753. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验