两种注射技术在手部生物刺激治疗中应用于稀浓度羟基磷灰石的疗效和安全性。
Efficacy and Safety of 2 Injection Techniques for Hand Biostimulatory Treatment With Diluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite.
机构信息
Collaborator at Departamento de Dermatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Departamento de Dermatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
出版信息
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Oct;46 Suppl 1:S54-S61. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002334.
BACKGROUND
Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) is effective for dorsal hand rejuvenation. Higher dilutions are used for biostimulation with fewer side effects.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 techniques of diluted CaHA injection for dorsal hand treatment.
METHODS
A prospective, evaluator-blinded study was performed to compare (side-to-side) techniques for treating the dorsum of the hands with diluted CaHA: deep fat lamina or subdermal injection. Fifteen women with aging grades between 1 and 3 on the MHGS (Merz hand grading scale) were enrolled and followed up for 24 weeks. The outcomes were a histological analysis of collagen, skin viscoelasticity, high-frequency ultrasound parameters, MHGS score, and the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) score.
RESULTS
Improvement in the MHGS and GAIS scores (p < .01) was observed, with no difference between techniques (p > .05). Skin viscoelasticity measures and ultrasonography for dermal parameters improved for both treatments (p < .01). The mean total collagen density increased from the baseline for both techniques (p < .01). Pain during the procedure as well as adverse effects within the follow-up did not differ between treatments (p > .4). The overall satisfaction was 12% greater for the subdermal technique (p < .05).
CONCLUSION
Diluted CaHA improves the skin quality of aging hands with a safe profile, without substantial differences between the techniques.
背景
羟基磷灰石(CaHA)对面部手部年轻化治疗效果显著。低浓度 CaHA 注射能产生更好的生物刺激效果,副作用更少。
目的
评估两种低浓度 CaHA 注射技术对面部手部治疗的疗效和安全性。
方法
前瞻性、评估者盲法研究比较了两种用于治疗手部背侧的 CaHA 注射技术(双侧):真皮深层脂肪层或皮下注射。15 名女性患者手部老化程度为 MHGS(Merz 手部等级量表)1-3 级,随访 24 周。评估指标包括胶原组织学分析、皮肤黏弹性、高频超声参数、MHGS 评分和整体美学改善量表(GAIS)评分。
结果
两种技术均能显著改善 MHGS 和 GAIS 评分(p <.01),但两者之间无差异(p >.05)。两种治疗方法均能改善皮肤黏弹性测量值和真皮参数的超声参数(p <.01)。两种技术的总胶原密度均较基线增加(p <.01)。两种治疗方法的术中疼痛和随访期间的不良反应无差异(p >.4)。皮下注射技术的整体满意度比真皮深层脂肪层注射技术高 12%(p <.05)。
结论
低浓度 CaHA 能改善手部老化皮肤的质量,具有安全的特性,且两种技术之间无显著差异。