Collaborator at Departamento de Dermatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Departamento de Dermatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Oct;46 Suppl 1:S54-S61. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002334.
Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) is effective for dorsal hand rejuvenation. Higher dilutions are used for biostimulation with fewer side effects.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 techniques of diluted CaHA injection for dorsal hand treatment.
A prospective, evaluator-blinded study was performed to compare (side-to-side) techniques for treating the dorsum of the hands with diluted CaHA: deep fat lamina or subdermal injection. Fifteen women with aging grades between 1 and 3 on the MHGS (Merz hand grading scale) were enrolled and followed up for 24 weeks. The outcomes were a histological analysis of collagen, skin viscoelasticity, high-frequency ultrasound parameters, MHGS score, and the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) score.
Improvement in the MHGS and GAIS scores (p < .01) was observed, with no difference between techniques (p > .05). Skin viscoelasticity measures and ultrasonography for dermal parameters improved for both treatments (p < .01). The mean total collagen density increased from the baseline for both techniques (p < .01). Pain during the procedure as well as adverse effects within the follow-up did not differ between treatments (p > .4). The overall satisfaction was 12% greater for the subdermal technique (p < .05).
Diluted CaHA improves the skin quality of aging hands with a safe profile, without substantial differences between the techniques.
羟基磷灰石(CaHA)对面部手部年轻化治疗效果显著。低浓度 CaHA 注射能产生更好的生物刺激效果,副作用更少。
评估两种低浓度 CaHA 注射技术对面部手部治疗的疗效和安全性。
前瞻性、评估者盲法研究比较了两种用于治疗手部背侧的 CaHA 注射技术(双侧):真皮深层脂肪层或皮下注射。15 名女性患者手部老化程度为 MHGS(Merz 手部等级量表)1-3 级,随访 24 周。评估指标包括胶原组织学分析、皮肤黏弹性、高频超声参数、MHGS 评分和整体美学改善量表(GAIS)评分。
两种技术均能显著改善 MHGS 和 GAIS 评分(p <.01),但两者之间无差异(p >.05)。两种治疗方法均能改善皮肤黏弹性测量值和真皮参数的超声参数(p <.01)。两种技术的总胶原密度均较基线增加(p <.01)。两种治疗方法的术中疼痛和随访期间的不良反应无差异(p >.4)。皮下注射技术的整体满意度比真皮深层脂肪层注射技术高 12%(p <.05)。
低浓度 CaHA 能改善手部老化皮肤的质量,具有安全的特性,且两种技术之间无显著差异。