Calcium Hydroxylapatite-Based Fillers in Facial Rejuvenation: A Prospective, Single-Center, Unblinded Comparative Outcome Study of Radiesse vs. Rennova Diamond Intense.

: Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA)-based dermal fillers are widely used in esthetic medicine due to their dual volumizing and biostimulatory properties. Despite their rising popularity, comparative clinical outcome data evaluating different CaHA fillers remain limited. This prospective, single-center, unblinded study aimed to establish the effectiveness of the CaHA filler Rennova Diamond Intense via comparison to the well-established CaHA filler Radiesse in terms of clinical performance, safety, and patient satisfaction. : Thirty patients (28 female, 2 male) underwent a single-session bilateral injection of Rennova Diamond Intense (right side) and Radiesse (left side) in the lower and medial posterior facial regions. Outcomes evaluated at multiple time points included dermal thickness, skin elasticity, transepidermal water loss, patient-reported outcomes (S-GAIS), physician-assessed outcomes (P-GAIS), and adverse events. : Both fillers showed improvements across all parameters. Patient-reported S-GAIS indicated predominantly "improved" outcomes at days 60 and 120, whereas physician assessments (P-GAIS) predominantly indicated "very improved" results at day 120. Ultrasound revealed increases in dermal thickness for both fillers. Similarly, improvements in skin elasticity and decreases in transepidermal water loss were observed bilaterally. Mild, transient adverse events (pain, swelling, redness, bruising) resolved spontaneously within 30 days post injection. : Rennova Diamond Intense effectively increases dermal thickness, improves skin elasticity, and reduces transepidermal water loss, achieving high patient and physician satisfaction. These findings underscore its safety, versatility, and efficacy for esthetic facial rejuvenation, warranting further long-term evaluation.