Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Diabet Med. 2021 Feb;38(2):e14409. doi: 10.1111/dme.14409. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors vs placebo as add-on therapy after metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor dual therapy in type 2 diabetes.
This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018099398). A search was conducted via PubMed, www.clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of relevant randomised controlled trials up until 14 August 2020 that compared sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors vs placebo as add-on therapy after metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor therapy. A random-effects model was used.
Six randomised controlled trials (1661 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor treatment, as add-on to metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor therapy, was associated with a significant reduction in HbA level [mean difference -8 mmol/mol, 95% CI -10, -6 (-0.7%, 95% CI -0.9, -0.6); P < 0.00001], in fasting plasma glucose level [mean difference -1.70 mmol/l, 95% CI -1.91, -1.49; P < 0.00001], in weight (mean difference -1.76 kg, 95% CI -2.04, -1.48; P < 0.00001) and in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure: mean difference -3.6 mmHg, 95% CI -4.8, -2.4; P < 0.00001; diastolic blood pressure: mean difference -1.5 mmHg; 95% CI -2.4, -0.6; P = 0.002). Genital mycotic infections (odds ratio 7.37, 95% CI 3.06, 17.76; P < 0.00001) were more common with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, but there was no significant statistical difference in urinary tract infections (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 0.63, 2.13; P = 0.64), in hypoglycaemia (odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI 0.61, 3.04; P = 0.45), or in discontinuation rates due to adverse events (odds ratio 1.52, 95% CI 0.78, 2.97; P = 0.22) between the two groups.
In comparison with placebo, add-on therapy with a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor is significantly more efficacious in lowering HbA , fasting plasma glucose and weight in people with type 2 diabetes following inadequate glycaemic control with metformin and a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events was similar despite higher risk of genital mycotic infections.
系统评价和荟萃分析评估钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)与安慰剂作为二甲双胍和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂双重治疗后 2 型糖尿病的附加疗法的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018099398)进行。通过 PubMed、www.clinicaltrials.gov 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库检索相关随机对照试验,截至 2020 年 8 月 14 日,比较 SGLT2i 与安慰剂作为二甲双胍和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂治疗后的附加疗法。使用随机效应模型。
符合纳入标准的 6 项随机对照试验(1661 名参与者)。与安慰剂相比,SGLT2i 作为二甲双胍和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂治疗的附加疗法,可显著降低 HbA1c 水平[平均差值-8mmol/mol,95%CI-10,-6(-0.7%,95%CI-0.9,-0.6);P<0.00001]、空腹血糖水平[平均差值-1.70mmol/l,95%CI-1.91,-1.49(P<0.00001)]、体重[平均差值-1.76kg,95%CI-2.04,-1.48(P<0.00001)]和血压[收缩压:平均差值-3.6mmHg,95%CI-4.8,-2.4(P<0.00001);舒张压:平均差值-1.5mmHg;95%CI-2.4,-0.6;P=0.002]。与 SGLT2i 相比,生殖道真菌感染(比值比 7.37,95%CI 3.06,17.76;P<0.00001)更为常见,但尿路感染(比值比 1.16,95%CI 0.63,2.13;P=0.64)、低血糖(比值比 1.36,95%CI 0.61,3.04;P=0.45)或因不良事件停药率(比值比 1.52,95%CI 0.78,2.97;P=0.22)在两组之间无显著统计学差异。
与安慰剂相比,SGLT2i 附加疗法在二甲双胍和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂治疗后血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,在降低 HbA1c、空腹血糖和体重方面更有效。尽管生殖道真菌感染的风险较高,但因不良事件而停药的发生率相似。