Suppr超能文献

GRADE 指南 30:建模证据确定性评估的 GRADE 方法——在卫生决策背景下的概述。

GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster GRADE Centre & Michael DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health. PhD Programme in Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain; Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:138-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study is to present the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) conceptual approach to the assessment of certainty of evidence from modeling studies (i.e., certainty associated with model outputs).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Expert consultations and an international multidisciplinary workshop informed development of a conceptual approach to assessing the certainty of evidence from models within the context of systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and health care decisions. The discussions also clarified selected concepts and terminology used in the GRADE approach and by the modeling community. Feedback from experts in a broad range of modeling and health care disciplines addressed the content validity of the approach.

RESULTS

Workshop participants agreed that the domains determining the certainty of evidence previously identified in the GRADE approach (risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision, reporting bias, magnitude of an effect, dose-response relation, and the direction of residual confounding) also apply when assessing the certainty of evidence from models. The assessment depends on the nature of model inputs and the model itself and on whether one is evaluating evidence from a single model or multiple models. We propose a framework for selecting the best available evidence from models: 1) developing de novo, a model specific to the situation of interest, 2) identifying an existing model, the outputs of which provide the highest certainty evidence for the situation of interest, either "off-the-shelf" or after adaptation, and 3) using outputs from multiple models. We also present a summary of preferred terminology to facilitate communication among modeling and health care disciplines.

CONCLUSION

This conceptual GRADE approach provides a framework for using evidence from models in health decision-making and the assessment of certainty of evidence from a model or models. The GRADE Working Group and the modeling community are currently developing the detailed methods and related guidance for assessing specific domains determining the certainty of evidence from models across health care-related disciplines (e.g., therapeutic decision-making, toxicology, environmental health, and health economics).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在介绍 GRADE(评估、制定和评价推荐分级)方法,用于评估系统评价、卫生技术评估和卫生保健决策中模型研究证据的确定性(即与模型输出相关的确定性)。

研究设计和设置

专家咨询和国际多学科研讨会为评估模型证据的确定性提供了概念方法,该方法适用于系统评价、卫生技术评估和卫生保健决策。讨论还澄清了 GRADE 方法和建模界使用的某些概念和术语。来自建模和卫生保健领域的广泛专家的反馈解决了方法的内容有效性问题。

结果

研讨会参与者一致认为,GRADE 方法中先前确定的证据确定性领域(偏倚风险、间接性、不一致性、不精确性、报告偏倚、效应大小、剂量-反应关系和残余混杂的方向)也适用于评估模型证据的确定性。评估取决于模型输入和模型本身的性质,以及评估的是单个模型还是多个模型的证据。我们提出了一个从模型中选择最佳可用证据的框架:1)针对感兴趣的情况开发特定于模型的模型,2)识别可提供感兴趣情况下最高确定性证据的现有模型,无论是“现成的”还是经过调整后,3)使用多个模型的输出。我们还提出了一个首选术语摘要,以促进建模和卫生保健学科之间的沟通。

结论

本概念性 GRADE 方法为在卫生决策中使用模型证据以及评估模型或模型的证据确定性提供了一个框架。GRADE 工作组和建模界目前正在为评估跨卫生保健相关学科(如治疗决策、毒理学、环境卫生和卫生经济学)中确定模型证据确定性的特定领域的详细方法和相关指南进行开发。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
ExpoQual: Evaluating measured and modeled human exposure data.ExpoQual:评估实测和模型化人体暴露数据。
Environ Res. 2019 Apr;171:302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.039. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
10
The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence.GRADE工作组对证据确定性的概念进行了澄清。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;87:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验