Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile. ORCID: 0000-0002-3675-3739.
Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile. ORCID: 0000-0001-9150-0323.
Medwave. 2021 Mar 17;21(2):e8109. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2021.02.8109.
The certainty of the evidence for interventions is the certainty or confidence that the true effect is within a particular range or relative to a threshold. In the new pyramid of evidence, systematic reviews represent the magnifying glass through which this certainty is evaluated. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach arises in response to the existence of multiple evidence classification systems, and it offers a transparent and structured process to develop and present summaries of evidence considering its certainty and, in a second step, the strength of the recommendations that they inform. The GRADE process begins with an explicit question that includes all important and critical outcomes explicitly. The main domains used to assess the certainty of the evidence are risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness of evidence, imprecision, and publication bias. The factors that can increase the certainty of the evidence are dose-response gradient, large magnitude of an effect, and effect of plausible residual confounding. Finally, the Summary of Findings tables summarize the process in a simplified way and with controlled language. This narrative reviews purpose is to address the GRADE approachs theoretical and practical underlying concepts in a simplified way and with practical examples.
证据确定性是指干预措施的真实效果在特定范围内或相对于某个阈值的确定程度或置信度。在新的证据金字塔中,系统评价代表了评估这种确定性的放大镜。GRADE(推荐评估、制定与评价分级)方法是为了应对多种证据分类系统的存在而产生的,它提供了一个透明和结构化的过程,用于考虑证据的确定性,并在第二步中,根据它们提供的建议的强度,来制定和呈现证据摘要。GRADE 过程从一个明确的问题开始,该问题明确包含所有重要和关键的结果。用于评估证据确定性的主要领域包括偏倚风险、不一致性、证据间接性、不精确性和发表偏倚。能够提高证据确定性的因素包括剂量-反应梯度、效果的幅度大和可能存在的残余混杂的影响。最后,“研究结果总结”表以简化和受控的语言总结了这一过程。本叙述性综述的目的是以简化的方式并结合实际示例来阐述 GRADE 方法的理论和实践基础概念。