Suppr超能文献

三种不同药物涂层球囊治疗新发冠状动脉病变的长期结果。

Long term outcome after treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions using three different drug coated balloons.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 15;325:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.09.054. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of three currently available drug coated balloons (DCB) for the treatment of de-novo coronary lesions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry. Between 2009 and 2017, three currently available DCB brands used in the treatment of de novo lesions were included. Outcomes were clinically driven restenosis and target lesion thrombosis (TLT) (per device) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization (per patient) at 4 years. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to adjust for differences.

RESULTS

We included 6715 lesions treated with DCBs, 4483 SeQuent® Please (S-DCB), 1071 IN.PACT Falcon (I-DCB) and 1161 Pantera® Lux (P-DCB), in 5670 patients. The mean DCB diameter was 2.4 mm. Bailout stenting occurred in 6.7% of lesions. Angiographic success was 98.5%. The overall cumulative rate of restenosis was 5.5% (299 events). The risk for reported restenosis did not significantly differ between I-DCB vs S-DCB, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.34, P-DCB vs S-DCB aHR 0.88; 95% CI 0.63-1.23 and I-DCB vs P-DCB aHR 1.10; 95% CI 0.72-1.68. The cumulative risk for TLT was 0.8% in all three DCBs. The risk for MACE or individual components of MACE did not differ between the three patient-groups.

CONCLUSION

In de novo coronary lesions, we found comparable long-term efficacy with three currently available DCB brands. DCB angioplasty was feasible with low risk for long-term restenosis and TLT.

摘要

目的

评估三种目前可用的药物涂层球囊(DCB)治疗新发冠状动脉病变的长期疗效。

方法

这是一项来自瑞典冠状动脉造影和血管成形术登记处前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。2009 年至 2017 年期间,纳入了三种目前用于治疗新发病变的可用 DCB 品牌。主要终点是治疗后 4 年的临床驱动性再狭窄和靶病变血栓形成(TLT)(按器械计)和主要不良心脏事件(MACE),包括死亡、心肌梗死或靶血管血运重建(按患者计)。多变量 Cox 回归模型用于调整差异。

结果

我们纳入了 6715 个接受 DCB 治疗的病变,4483 个 SeQuent® Please(S-DCB),1071 个 IN.PACT Falcon(I-DCB)和 1161 个 Pantera® Lux(P-DCB),涉及 5670 名患者。平均 DCB 直径为 2.4mm。病变处有 6.7%需要紧急支架置入。血管造影成功率为 98.5%。总的再狭窄累积发生率为 5.5%(299 例事件)。I-DCB 与 S-DCB 相比,报告的再狭窄风险无显著差异,调整后的危险比(aHR)为 0.96;95%置信区间(CI)为 0.69-1.34,P-DCB 与 S-DCB 的 aHR 为 0.88;95%CI 为 0.63-1.23,I-DCB 与 P-DCB 的 aHR 为 1.10;95%CI 为 0.72-1.68。三种 DCB 的 TLT 累积风险均为 0.8%。三组患者的 MACE 或 MACE 各组成部分的风险无差异。

结论

在新发冠状动脉病变中,我们发现三种目前可用的 DCB 品牌具有相当的长期疗效。DCB 血管成形术可行,长期再狭窄和 TLT 风险低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验