University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Radoja Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Physics, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 4, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
J Inorg Biochem. 2020 Dec;213:111256. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111256. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
Three new ruthenium(II) complexes were synthesized from different substituted isothiazole ligands 5-(methylamino)-3-pyrrolidine-1-ylisothiazole-4-carbonitrile (1), 5-(methylamino)-3-(4-methylpiperazine-1-yl)isothiazole-4-carbonitrile (2) and 5-(methylamino)-3-morpholine-4-ylisothiazole-4-carbonitrile (3): [Ru(η-p-cymene)Cl(L1)]·HO (4), [Ru(η-p-cymene)Cl(L2)] (5) and [Ru(η-p-cymene)Cl(L3)] (6). All complexes were characterized by IR, UV-Vis, NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. The molecular structures of all ligands and complexes 4 and 6 were determined by an X-ray. The results of the interactions of CT-DNA (calf thymus deoxyribonucleic acid) and HSA (human serum albumin) with ruthenium (II) complexes reveal that complex 4 binds well to CT-DNA and HSA. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for the reaction between complex and HSA confirmed the associative mode of interaction. The results of Quantum mechanics (QM) modelling and docking experiments toward DNA dodecamer and HSA support the strongest binding of the complex 4 to DNA major groove, as well as its binding to IIa domain of HSA with the lowest ΔG energy, which agrees with the solution studies. The modified GOLD docking results are indicative for Ru(p-cymene)LCl··(HSA··GLU292) binding and GOLD/MOPAC(QM) docking/modelling of DNA/Ligand (Ru(II)-N(7)dG7) covalent binding. The cytotoxic activity of compounds was evaluated by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide) assay. Neither of the tested compounds shows activity against a healthy MRC-5 cell line while the MCF-7 cell line is the most sensitive to all. Compounds 3, 4 and 5 were about two times more active than cisplatin, while the antiproliferative activity of 6 was almost the same as with cisplatin. Flow cytometry analysis showed the apoptotic death of the cells with a cell cycle arrest in the subG1 phase.
三种新的钌(II)配合物是由不同取代的异噻唑配体 5-(甲氨基)-3-吡咯烷-1-基异噻唑-4-甲腈(1)、5-(甲氨基)-3-(4-甲基哌嗪-1-基)异噻唑-4-甲腈(2)和 5-(甲氨基)-3-吗啉-4-基异噻唑-4-甲腈(3)合成的:[Ru(η-p-cymene)Cl(L1)]·HO(4)、[Ru(η-p-cymene)Cl(L2)](5)和[Ru(η-p-cymene)Cl(L3)](6)。所有配合物均通过 IR、UV-Vis、NMR 光谱和元素分析进行了表征。所有配体和配合物 4 和 6 的分子结构均通过 X 射线确定。CT-DNA(小牛胸腺脱氧核糖核酸)和 HSA(人血清白蛋白)与钌(II)配合物相互作用的结果表明,配合物 4 与 CT-DNA 和 HSA 结合良好。配合物与 HSA 反应的动力学和热力学参数证实了相互作用的缔合模式。量子力学(QM)建模和对接实验对 DNA 十二聚体和 HSA 的结果表明,配合物 4 与 DNA 大沟的结合最强,与 HSA 的 IIa 结构域的结合具有最低的ΔG 能量,这与溶液研究结果一致。改良的 GOLD 对接结果表明 Ru(p-cymene)LCl··(HSA··GLU292)结合,GOLD/MOPAC(QM)对接/建模 DNA/Ligand(Ru(II)-N(7)dG7)共价键。通过 MTT(3-(4,5-二甲基-2-噻唑基)-2,5-二苯基-2H-四唑溴盐)测定评估化合物的细胞毒性。测试的化合物均对健康的 MRC-5 细胞系没有活性,而 MCF-7 细胞系对所有化合物最敏感。化合物 3、4 和 5 比顺铂的活性高约两倍,而 6 的抗增殖活性几乎与顺铂相同。流式细胞术分析显示细胞凋亡死亡,并伴有细胞周期在 subG1 期停滞。