Rezende Fernanda M, Haile-Mariam Mekonnen, Pryce Jennie E, Peñagaricano Francisco
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611; Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia MG 38410-337, Brazil.
Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Dec;103(12):11618-11627. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18910. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
The use of information across populations is an attractive approach to increase the accuracy of genomic predictions for numerically small breeds and traits that are time-consuming and difficult to measure, such as male fertility in cattle. This study was conducted to evaluate genomic prediction of Jersey bull fertility using an across-country reference population combining records from the United States and Australia. The data set consisted of 1,570 US Jersey bulls with sire conception rate (SCR) records, 603 Australian Jersey bulls with semen fertility value (SFV) records and SNP genotypes for roughly 90,000 loci. Both SCR and SFV are evaluations of service sire fertility based on cow field data, and both are intended as phenotypic evaluations because the estimates include genetic and nongenetic effects. Within- and across-country genomic predictions were evaluated using univariate and bivariate genomic best linear unbiased prediction models. Predictive ability was assessed in 5-fold cross-validation using the correlation between observed and predicted fertility values and mean squared error of prediction. Within-country genomic predictions exhibited predictive correlations of around 0.28 and 0.02 for the United States and Australia, respectively. The Australian Jersey population is genetically diverse and small in size, so careful selection of the reference population by including only closely related animals (e.g., excluding New Zealand bulls, which is a less-related population) increased the predictive correlations up to 0.20. Notably, the use of bivariate models fitting all US Jersey records and the optimized Australian population resulted in predictive correlations around of 0.24 for SFV values, which is a relative increase in predictive ability of 20%. Conversely, for predicting SCR values, the use of an across-country reference population did not outperform the standard approach using pure US Jersey reference data set. Our findings indicate that genomic prediction of male fertility in dairy cattle is feasible, and the use of an across-country reference population would be beneficial when local populations are small and genetically diverse.
在不同群体间使用信息是一种很有吸引力的方法,可提高对数量较少品种以及耗时且难以测量的性状(如奶牛的雄性生育力)进行基因组预测的准确性。本研究旨在通过结合美国和澳大利亚的记录,利用跨国参考群体来评估泽西公牛生育力的基因组预测。数据集包括1570头有 sire conception rate(SCR)记录的美国泽西公牛、603头有 semen fertility value(SFV)记录的澳大利亚泽西公牛以及约90000个位点的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因型。SCR和SFV都是基于奶牛场数据对种公牛生育力的评估,且都旨在作为表型评估,因为这些估计值包括遗传和非遗传效应。使用单变量和双变量基因组最佳线性无偏预测模型评估了国内和跨国的基因组预测。在5折交叉验证中,使用观察到的和预测的生育力值之间的相关性以及预测的均方误差来评估预测能力。美国和澳大利亚国内的基因组预测分别表现出约0.28和0.02的预测相关性。澳大利亚泽西牛群体在遗传上具有多样性且规模较小,因此通过仅纳入亲缘关系密切的动物(例如排除新西兰公牛,其是亲缘关系较远的群体)来仔细选择参考群体,可将预测相关性提高到0.20。值得注意的是,使用拟合所有美国泽西牛记录和优化后的澳大利亚群体的双变量模型,对于SFV值产生了约0.24的预测相关性,这是预测能力相对提高了20%。相反,对于预测SCR值,使用跨国参考群体并不优于使用纯美国泽西牛参考数据集的标准方法。我们的研究结果表明,奶牛雄性生育力的基因组预测是可行的,并且当本地群体规模较小且遗传多样时,使用跨国参考群体将是有益的。