Suppr超能文献

宫颈环形电切术(LEEP)与后续子宫切除术之间的时间间隔对术后感染发病率的影响。

Effect of Time Interval Between LEEP and Subsequent Hysterectomy on Postoperative Infectious Morbidity.

作者信息

Ni Ting, Meng Yaping, Li Yuhong, Chen Qinfang, Huang Yong, Wang Lihua, Qian Xiaolei, Wang Yudong

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China.

Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Sep 10;16:839-847. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S270590. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to provide insight into the effect of time interval between loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and subsequent hysterectomy on postoperative infectious morbidity in cervical neoplasia patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 1172 medical records of patients who were diagnosed with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL) or invasive cancer underwent a subsequent hysterectomy after LEEP at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital (IPMCH) in Shanghai, China from January 2008 to December 2019 were collected. The study outcome was postoperative infectious morbidity within 30 days after a hysterectomy. Overall and surgical approach specific effect of time interval on infectious morbidity was estimated using logistic regression in crude and adjusted models.

RESULTS

There was an inverse association between time interval and postoperative infectious morbidity in HSIL or invasive cancer patients (OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-1.00, p=0.0079). When trisecting time interval into three parts, the top tertile time interval (34-90 days) was also inversely associated with infectious morbidity compared with bottom tertile (0-16 days), independent of stage, surgical approach, operative time and estimated blood loss (OR=0.66,95% CI: 0.43-1.00, P=0.0487). A test for interaction between time interval and surgical approach on infectious morbidity was significant (P values for interaction= 0.0352). Longer time interval significantly reduced the risk of infectious morbidity in the laparoscopic group (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17-0.78), while no statistically significant effects were observed in patients who underwent vaginal or open abdominal hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

The time interval and surgical approach can interactively affect the risk of postoperative infectious morbidity in cervical neoplasia patients who underwent a hysterectomy after LEEP. Our data suggest that compared with vaginal or open abdominal hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy required a longer time interval (34-90 days) to reduce the risk of infectious morbidity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在深入了解环形电切术(LEEP)与后续子宫切除术之间的时间间隔对宫颈肿瘤患者术后感染发病率的影响。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,收集了2008年1月至2019年12月在中国上海国际和平妇幼保健院接受LEEP术后接受后续子宫切除术的1172例被诊断为高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(HSIL)或浸润癌患者的病历。研究结果是子宫切除术后30天内的术后感染发病率。在粗模型和校正模型中使用逻辑回归估计时间间隔对感染发病率的总体和手术方式特定影响。

结果

HSIL或浸润癌患者的时间间隔与术后感染发病率之间存在负相关(OR=0.99,95%CI:0.98-1.00,p=0.0079)。将时间间隔三等分后,与最低三分位数(0-16天)相比,最高三分位数时间间隔(34-90天)也与感染发病率呈负相关,独立于分期、手术方式、手术时间和估计失血量(OR=0.66,95%CI:0.43-1.00,P=0.0487)。时间间隔与手术方式对感染发病率的交互作用检验具有显著性(交互作用P值=0.0352)。较长的时间间隔显著降低了腹腔镜组的感染发病风险(OR = 0.37,95%CI:0.17-0.78),而在接受阴道或开腹子宫切除术的患者中未观察到统计学显著影响。

结论

时间间隔和手术方式可交互影响LEEP术后接受子宫切除术的宫颈肿瘤患者术后感染发病风险。我们的数据表明,与阴道或开腹子宫切除术相比,腹腔镜子宫切除术需要更长的时间间隔(34-90天)来降低感染发病风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb2/7490066/d35827a2d416/TCRM-16-839-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验