Maurer Marcus, Giménez-Arnau Ana, Ensina Luis Felipe, Chu Chia-Yu, Jaumont Xavier, Tassinari Paolo
Dermatological Allergology, Allergie-Centrum-Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Dermatology Department, Hospital del Mar. IMIM, Universitat Autònoma, Barcelona, Spain.
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Sep 12;13(9):100460. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100460. eCollection 2020 Sep.
A Worldwide Antihistamine-Refractory Chronic Urticaria (CU) patient Evaluation (AWARE) is a non-interventional, multicenter study including patients from Europe, Central and Latin America, Asia-Pacific, and the Middle East. AWARE describes real-world evidence for CU, including clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and the impact on quality of life.
Over the 2-year study, therapy changes, angioedema occurrence, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded over 9 visits, including dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and 7-day urticaria activity score (UAS7). Data were stratified into subgroups: chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU), or CSU + CIndU.
Out of 4838 patients analyzed, 9.9% were receiving no treatment for their CU symptoms at baseline, and 20.4% were receiving first-line non-sedating H-antihistamine at approved doses. The predominant baseline therapy was up-dosed non-sedating H-antihistamines (25.5%). By Visit 2, omalizumab was the overall most commonly used therapy (29.6%), increasing to 30.1% by the end of the study. Baseline DLQI scores for patients with CSU, CIndU and CSU + CIndU were 8.3, 7.6 and 9.1, respectively; scores decreased over the study for CSU and CSU + CIndU patients, but fluctuated for CIndU patients. Baseline angioedema occurrence was higher in CSU and CSU + CIndU patients, reported in 45.4% and 45.5% of patients, respectively, compared to 17.0% in CIndU patients. By the final visit, angioedema had decreased to 11.9% and 11.2% for CSU and CSU + CIndU, respectively, and 9.6% for CIndU.
CU patients are undertreated at baseline; after entering the AWARE study, more patients received appropriate treatment. However, over two thirds are not escalated to third-line treatments.
全球抗组胺药难治性慢性荨麻疹(CU)患者评估(AWARE)是一项非干预性多中心研究,纳入了来自欧洲、中美洲和拉丁美洲、亚太地区及中东地区的患者。AWARE描述了CU的真实世界证据,包括临床特征、治疗模式以及对生活质量的影响。
在为期2年的研究中,记录了9次随访中的治疗变化、血管性水肿的发生情况以及患者报告的结局(PROs),包括皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和7天荨麻疹活动评分(UAS7)。数据被分层为亚组:慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)、慢性诱导性荨麻疹(CIndU)或CSU + CIndU。
在分析的4838例患者中,9.9%在基线时未接受针对CU症状的治疗,20.4%接受批准剂量的一线非镇静性H1抗组胺药治疗。主要的基线治疗是加大剂量的非镇静性H1抗组胺药(25.5%)。到第2次随访时,奥马珠单抗是总体上最常用的治疗药物(29.6%),到研究结束时增至30.1%。CSU、CIndU和CSU + CIndU患者的基线DLQI评分分别为8.3、7.6和9.1;CSU和CSU + CIndU患者的评分在研究过程中下降,但CIndU患者的评分有波动。CSU和CSU + CIndU患者基线时血管性水肿的发生率较高,分别有45.4%和45.5%的患者报告有血管性水肿,而CIndU患者中这一比例为17.0%。到最后一次随访时,CSU和CSU + CIndU患者的血管性水肿发生率分别降至11.9%和11.2%,CIndU患者降至9.6%。
CU患者在基线时治疗不足;进入AWARE研究后,更多患者接受了适当的治疗。然而,超过三分之二的患者未升级至三线治疗。