Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Feb;74(2):324-335. doi: 10.1002/acr.24468.
To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) who were enrolled in an international registry, the Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) clinical database and repository, overall and by clinical and laboratory subtypes.
The APS ACTION registry includes adults who persistently had positivity for aPLs. We evaluated baseline sociodemographic and aPL-related (APS classification criteria and "non-criteria") characteristics of patients overall and in subgroups (aPL-positive without APS, APS overall, thrombotic APS only, obstetric APS only, and both thrombotic APS/obstetric APS). We assessed baseline characteristics of patients tested for the presence of three aPLs (lupus anticoagulant [LAC] test, anticardiolipin antibody [aCL], and anti-β -glycoprotein I [anti-β GPI]) antibodies by aPL profiles (LAC only, single, double, and triple aPL positivity).
The 804 aPL-positive patients assessed in the present study had a mean age of 45 ± 13 years, were 74% female, and 68% White; additionally, 36% had other systemic autoimmune diseases. Of these 804 aPL-positive patients, 80% were classified as having APS (with 55% having thrombotic APS, 9% obstetric APS, and 15% thrombotic APS/obstetric APS). In the overall cohort, 71% had vascular thrombosis, 50% with a history of pregnancy had obstetric morbidity, and 56% had experienced at least one non-criteria manifestation. Among those with three aPLs tested (n = 660), 42% were triple aPL-positive. While single-, double-, and triple aPL-positive subgroups had similar frequencies of vascular, obstetric, and non-criteria events, these events were lowest in the single aPL subgroup, which consisted of aCLs or anti-β GPI only.
Our study demonstrates the heterogeneity of aPL-related clinical manifestations and laboratory profiles in a multicenter international cohort. Within single aPL positivity, LAC may be a major contributor to clinical events. Future prospective analyses, using standardized core laboratory aPL tests, will help clarify aPL risk profiles and improve risk stratification.
描述参与国际注册中心——抗磷脂综合征(APS)联盟临床试验和国际网络(APS ACTION)临床数据库和存储库的抗磷脂抗体(aPL)阳性患者的基线特征,包括总体情况以及按临床和实验室亚型分类的情况。
APS ACTION 注册中心纳入了持续存在 aPL 阳性的成年人。我们评估了患者的基线社会人口统计学和 aPL 相关(APS 分类标准和“非标准”)特征,包括总体情况和亚组(无 APS 的 aPL 阳性、总体 APS、单纯血栓性 APS、单纯产科 APS 以及血栓性 APS/产科 APS 均有)。我们评估了通过 aPL 谱(仅狼疮抗凝物 [LAC] 试验、单一、双阳性和三阳性 aPL 阳性)检测三种 aPL(LAC、抗心磷脂抗体 [aCL] 和抗-β2-糖蛋白 I [抗-βGPI])阳性患者的基线特征。
本研究共评估了 804 例 aPL 阳性患者,平均年龄 45±13 岁,74%为女性,68%为白人;此外,36%有其他系统性自身免疫性疾病。在这 804 例 aPL 阳性患者中,80%被归类为 APS(55%为血栓性 APS,9%为产科 APS,15%为血栓性 APS/产科 APS)。在整个队列中,71%有血管血栓形成,50%有妊娠史的患者有产科并发症,56%至少有一次非标准表现。在接受三种 aPL 检测的患者中(n=660),42%为三阳性。尽管单阳性、双阳性和三阳性亚组的血管、产科和非标准事件发生率相似,但单阳性亚组的这些事件发生率最低,其中仅包含 aCL 或抗-βGPI。
本研究表明,在多中心国际队列中,aPL 相关临床表现和实验室特征存在异质性。在单阳性 aPL 中,LAC 可能是导致临床事件的主要因素。未来使用标准化核心实验室 aPL 检测的前瞻性分析将有助于阐明 aPL 风险特征并改善风险分层。