Suppr超能文献

不道德遗忘对工具性动机的反应比对享乐性动机的反应更强烈。

Unethical amnesia responds more to instrumental than to hedonic motives.

机构信息

Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique, UMR5824, Univ Lyon, CNRS, F-69130 Ecully, France.

CNRS, Sciences Po, 75337 Paris, France.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 13;117(41):25423-25428. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011291117. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

Abstract

Humans care about morality. Yet, they often engage in actions that contradict their moral self. Unethical amnesia is observed when people do not remember or remember less vividly these actions. This paper explores two reasons why individuals may experience unethical amnesia. Forgetting past unethical behavior may be motivated by purely hedonic or affective reasons, such as the willingness to maintain one's moral self-image, but also by instrumental or strategic motives, in anticipation of future misbehavior. In a large-scale incentivized online experiment ( = 1,322) using a variant of a mind game, we find that hedonic considerations are not sufficient to motivate the forgetting of past cheating behavior. This is confirmed in a follow-up experiment ( = 1,005) in which recalls are elicited the same day instead of 3 wk apart. However, when unethical amnesia can serve as a justification for a future action, such as deciding on whether to keep undeserved money, motivated forgetting is more likely. Thereby, we show that motivated forgetting occurs as a self-excuse to justify future immoral decisions.

摘要

人类关心道德。然而,他们经常做出违背自己道德准则的行为。当人们不记得或不太记得这些行为时,就会出现不道德的遗忘。本文探讨了个体可能经历不道德遗忘的两个原因。忘记过去的不道德行为可能是出于纯粹的享乐或情感原因,例如保持自己道德形象的意愿,但也可能出于工具性或策略性动机,以预期未来的不当行为。在一项使用心理游戏变体的大规模激励在线实验(n=1322)中,我们发现享乐因素不足以促使人们忘记过去的欺骗行为。在后续的一项实验(n=1005)中,当回忆是在同一天而不是相隔 3 周时被唤起,这一点得到了证实。然而,当不道德的遗忘可以作为未来行为的正当理由时,例如决定是否保留不应得的钱,那么有动机的遗忘就更有可能发生。由此,我们表明,有动机的遗忘是一种自我辩解,以证明未来不道德的决定是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01c3/7568269/8020dc5c125b/pnas.2011291117fig01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验