Suppr超能文献

切勿轻信网上有关腹股沟疝修补技术的视频。

Thou shalt not trust online videos for inguinal hernia repair techniques.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Beverly Hills Hernia Center, 450 N Roxbury Drive #224, Beverly Hills, CA, 90210, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5724-5728. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08035-z. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Videos are used by surgeons when learning new techniques; however, online videos are often not vetted. Our aim is to review online videos of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs based on a benchmark for critical view of the myopectineal orifice (MPO) and safe inguinal hernia repair as defined by Daes and Felix and commonly referred to as "the 9 Commandments."

METHODS AND MATERIALS

YouTube was queried for "laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair." The top 50 videos were ranked based on number of views. Those endorsed and/or vetted by surgical societies were excluded (n = 4). Three expert hernia surgeons scored the videos based on adherence to the 9 Commandments.

RESULTS

The 50 videos originated from 11 countries. They had 72,825 mean views and a mean runtime of 14 min. Videos obeyed a median of 77.8% of commandments shown. Eight videos (16%) obeyed all 9 (100%) commandments. Three videos (6%) failed to obey any commandments. Operations employed TEP (18, 36%), TAPP (28, 56%), and rTAPP (4, 8%) approach. Stratification by approach showed significant variance in commandments obeyed (Kurskal-Wallis, p = 0.016) with significant difference between TEP and rTAPP scores (p = 0.008) and no significant difference between TEP and TAPP or rTAPP and TAPP scores. Twenty-three videos (46%) displayed unsafe techniques including: threatened critical structures (16, 32%), rough tissue handling (15, 30%), and dangerous placement of fixation (9, 18%).

CONCLUSION

Online surgical videos on YouTube are not reliable in demonstrating best practices for minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs. In our study, only 16% of the most viewed videos followed all 9 Commandments for critical view of the MPO. Many showed suboptimal repairs with significant safety concerns. While a significant number of online videos are a free and readily available resource for surgeons around the world, we recommend caution in relying on non-vetted videos as a form of surgical education.

摘要

背景

外科医生在学习新技术时会使用视频;然而,在线视频往往未经审查。我们的目的是根据 Daes 和 Felix 定义的关键视野(MPO)和安全腹股沟疝修复基准以及通常称为“九诫”来审查腹腔镜腹股沟疝修复的在线视频。

方法和材料

在 YouTube 上搜索“腹腔镜腹股沟疝修复”。根据观看次数对前 50 个视频进行排名。排除了得到外科协会认可和/或审查的视频(n=4)。三位疝外科专家根据对“九诫”的遵守情况对视频进行评分。

结果

这 50 个视频来自 11 个国家。它们的平均观看次数为 72825 次,平均运行时间为 14 分钟。视频遵守了中位数为 77.8%的戒律。有 8 个视频(16%)遵守了所有 9 个(100%)戒律。有 3 个视频(6%)没有遵守任何戒律。手术采用 TEP(18 例,36%)、TAPP(28 例,56%)和 rTAPP(4 例,8%)方法。按方法分层,遵守戒律的情况存在显著差异(克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验,p=0.016),TEP 和 rTAPP 评分之间存在显著差异(p=0.008),而 TEP 和 TAPP 或 rTAPP 和 TAPP 评分之间无显著差异。23 个视频(46%)显示不安全技术,包括:危及关键结构(16 例,32%)、粗糙组织处理(15 例,30%)和固定危险放置(9 例,18%)。

结论

YouTube 上的在线外科手术视频在演示微创腹股沟疝修复的最佳实践方面不可靠。在我们的研究中,只有 16%的观看次数最多的视频遵循了 MPO 关键视野的所有 9 条戒律。许多视频显示修复效果不理想,存在重大安全隐患。虽然大量在线视频是全球外科医生免费且易于获取的资源,但我们建议谨慎使用未经审查的视频作为一种手术教育形式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验