• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparative evaluation of laparoscopic TAPP videos on YouTube and WebSurg: surgical steps and educational value.YouTube和WebSurg上腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)视频的比较评估:手术步骤及教育价值
Hernia. 2025 May 3;29(1):155. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03341-8.
2
Comparison of Educational and Academic Quality of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Videos on WebSurg and YouTube Platforms.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术视频在 WebSurg 和 YouTube 平台上的教育和学术质量比较。
Surg Innov. 2023 Dec;30(6):728-738. doi: 10.1177/15533506231208583. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic hysterectomy videos on YouTube and WebSurg platforms in terms of educational reliability and quality.比较 YouTube 和 WebSurg 平台上的腹腔镜子宫切除术视频在教育可靠性和质量方面的差异。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct;51(8):102435. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102435. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
4
Educational value of surgical videos on transabdominal pre-peritoneal hernia repair (TAPP) on YouTube.YouTube 上经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)手术视频的教育价值
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):741-753. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02171-0. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
The educational quality of the critical view of safety in videos on youtube® versus specialized platforms: which is better? Critical view of safety in virtual resources.YouTube® 与专业平台上的安全关键视角视频的教育质量:哪个更好?虚拟资源中的安全关键视角。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):337-345. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08286-4. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
New learning area in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: YouTube® or WebSurg®?胃癌腹腔镜胃切除术的新学习领域:YouTube® 还是 WebSurg®?
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Jan-Mar;18(1):129-135. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_300_20.
7
Quality evolution of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos over two decades: a comparative study of YouTube and WebSurg.二十年来腹腔镜胆囊切除术视频的质量演变:YouTube与WebSurg的比较研究
ANZ J Surg. 2025 May;95(5):919-925. doi: 10.1111/ans.19359. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
8
Laparoscopic myomectomy videos on WebSurg and YouTube: does peer review process make a difference?WebSurg和YouTube上的腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术视频:同行评审过程有作用吗?
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2024 Mar 6;25(1):24-29. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2023-5-7.
9
Comparison of New Era's Education Platforms, YouTube® and WebSurg®, in Sleeve Gastrectomy.比较新时教育平台、YouTube® 和 WebSurg®, 在袖状胃切除术中的应用。
Obes Surg. 2019 Nov;29(11):3472-3477. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04008-x.
10
Comparison of Online Learning Video Platforms Regarding Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: YouTube and WebSurg.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术相关在线学习视频平台的比较:YouTube 和 WebSurg。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Apr;32(4):366-371. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0187. Epub 2021 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Educational and Academic Quality of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Videos on WebSurg and YouTube Platforms.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术视频在 WebSurg 和 YouTube 平台上的教育和学术质量比较。
Surg Innov. 2023 Dec;30(6):728-738. doi: 10.1177/15533506231208583. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
2
YouTube as a source of information on Helicobacter pylori: Content and quality analysis.YouTube 作为幽门螺杆菌信息来源:内容和质量分析。
Helicobacter. 2023 Aug;28(4):e12971. doi: 10.1111/hel.12971. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
Assessment of Esophagectomy Videos on YouTube: Is Peer Review Necessary for Quality?评估 YouTube 上的食管癌切除术视频:同行评审对于质量是否必要?
J Surg Res. 2022 Nov;279:368-373. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.037. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic hysterectomy videos on YouTube and WebSurg platforms in terms of educational reliability and quality.比较 YouTube 和 WebSurg 平台上的腹腔镜子宫切除术视频在教育可靠性和质量方面的差异。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct;51(8):102435. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102435. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
5
New learning area in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: YouTube® or WebSurg®?胃癌腹腔镜胃切除术的新学习领域:YouTube® 还是 WebSurg®?
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Jan-Mar;18(1):129-135. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_300_20.
6
Comparison of Online Learning Video Platforms Regarding Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: YouTube and WebSurg.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术相关在线学习视频平台的比较:YouTube 和 WebSurg。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Apr;32(4):366-371. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0187. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Thou shalt not trust online videos for inguinal hernia repair techniques.切勿轻信网上有关腹股沟疝修补技术的视频。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5724-5728. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08035-z. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Is Youtube a potential training source for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair?YouTube是否是完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的潜在培训来源?
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2014-2020. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07596-3. Epub 2020 May 4.
9
Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool.腹腔镜手术视频教育指南(LAP-VEGaS)视频评估工具:推荐的手术视频质量评估检查表的制定和验证。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1362-1369. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
10
Educational value of surgical videos on transabdominal pre-peritoneal hernia repair (TAPP) on YouTube.YouTube 上经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)手术视频的教育价值
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):741-753. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02171-0. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

YouTube和WebSurg上腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)视频的比较评估:手术步骤及教育价值

A comparative evaluation of laparoscopic TAPP videos on YouTube and WebSurg: surgical steps and educational value.

作者信息

Bulut Alisina, Akın Muhammed İkbal

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Basıbuyuk Yolu No: 9 D:2, Maltepe, Istanbul, 34854, Turkey.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kosuyolu High Specialization Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Hernia. 2025 May 3;29(1):155. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03341-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03341-8
PMID:40317323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12049284/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) videos on YouTube and WebSurg have an important place in surgical training. However, there are differences between these platforms in terms of training quality and compliance with standard surgical steps. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic TAPP videos on YouTube (limited to individually uploaded content) and WebSurg in terms of surgical technique and educational quality.

METHODS

Twelve videos meeting specific criteria were selected from both platforms. The 2 groups were compared using the 9 Commandments, which assessed compliance with surgical steps, and the Procedure Presentation Score (PPS), which assessed video quality/educational content. Data on video characteristics, such as view count, publication date, and duration, were also collected.

RESULTS

Although YouTube videos reached more viewers, WebSurg videos had higher compliance with the 9 Commandments (WebSurg median score 8/9 vs. YouTube median score 5/9, p < 0.01). In addition, WebSurg videos had higher PPS scores (median: 8) than YouTube videos (median: 5) (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

When utilizing online video platforms for surgical training, institutional training platforms such as WebSurg should be preferred. When the videos included here were compared with YouTube in the light of the defined criteria; it was seen that YouTube videos were not of sufficient quality.

摘要

目的

YouTube和WebSurg上的腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)视频在外科手术培训中占有重要地位。然而,这些平台在培训质量和对标准手术步骤的遵循方面存在差异。本研究的目的是比较YouTube(限于个人上传内容)和WebSurg上腹腔镜TAPP视频的手术技术和教育质量。

方法

从两个平台中选取了12个符合特定标准的视频。使用评估手术步骤遵循情况的“九条戒律”和评估视频质量/教育内容的手术演示评分(PPS)对两组进行比较。还收集了视频特征的数据,如观看次数、发布日期和时长。

结果

尽管YouTube视频的观看人数更多,但WebSurg视频对“九条戒律”的遵循度更高(WebSurg中位数评分8/9,而YouTube中位数评分5/9,p < 0.01)。此外,WebSurg视频的PPS评分(中位数:8)高于YouTube视频(中位数:5)(p = 0.02)。

结论

在利用在线视频平台进行外科手术培训时,应优先选择WebSurg等机构培训平台。根据既定标准将此处包含的视频与YouTube进行比较时,发现YouTube视频质量不够高。