Saffarpour Aida, Valizadeh Sara, Amini Abolghasem, Kharazifard Mohammad-Javd, Rohaninasab Marzieh
Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (International Campus), Tehran, Iran.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Dec;6(6):686-692. doi: 10.1002/cre2.313. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
This study assesses the effect of matrix metalloproteinases on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of an etch-and-rinse adhesive system.
This in vitro study evaluated 88 extracted premolars. The teeth were sectioned to expose dentin and were then randomly divided into four groups (n = 22). In group 1 (control), dentin surface was etched, and Adper Single Bond 2 was applied. In groups 2-4, dentin surface was etched and chlorhexidine (CHX), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were applied on the surfaces, respectively, and blotted dry. Next, Adper Single Bond 2 was applied and all teeth were built up with Z350 composite. In each group, half the samples immediately and the other half after 10,000 thermal cycles underwent μTBS test. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = .05).
In thermocycled samples, maximum μTBS was noted in CHX group followed by DMSO, EDC, and control group (p < .001). The thermocycled μTBS of composite to dentin was significantly higher in CHX group compared with EDC, DMSO, and control groups (p < .001) but was not significantly different in EDC and DMSO groups (p = .498).
The thermocycled μTBS obtained by the application of CHX, EDC, and DMSO was significantly higher compared with the value to the control group.
本研究评估基质金属蛋白酶对酸蚀冲洗粘结系统微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)的影响。
本体外研究评估了88颗拔除的前磨牙。将牙齿切片以暴露牙本质,然后随机分为四组(n = 22)。第1组(对照组),酸蚀牙本质表面,应用Adper Single Bond 2粘结剂。第2 - 4组,酸蚀牙本质表面后,分别在表面应用洗必泰(CHX)、1 - 乙基 - 3 -(3 - 二甲基氨基丙基)碳二亚胺(EDC)和二甲基亚砜(DMSO),并吸干。接下来,应用Adper Single Bond 2粘结剂,所有牙齿用Z350复合树脂修复。每组中,一半样本立即进行μTBS测试,另一半样本经过10000次热循环后进行μTBS测试。数据采用方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。
在经过热循环的样本中,CHX组的μTBS最高,其次是DMSO组、EDC组和对照组(p < 0.001)。与EDC组、DMSO组和对照组相比,CHX组复合树脂与牙本质热循环后的μTBS显著更高(p < 0.001),但EDC组和DMSO组之间无显著差异(p = 0.498)。
与对照组相比,应用CHX、EDC和DMSO后获得的热循环μTBS显著更高。