粘结强度测试的有效性：批判性综述 - 第二部分。
Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II.
作者信息
Sirisha Kantheti, Rambabu Tankonda, Ravishankar Yalavarthi, Ravikumar Pabbati
机构信息
Departments of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, GITAM Dental College and Hospital, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Departments of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College and Hospital, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
出版信息
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Sep;17(5):420-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.139823.
BACKGROUND
Macro-bond strength tests resulted in cohesive failures and overestimation of bond strengths. To reduce the flaws, micro-bond strength tests were introduced. They are the most commonly used bond-strength tests.
OBJECTIVE
Thus the objective of this review is to critically review the reliability of micro-bond strength tests used to evaluate resin-tooth interface.
DATA COLLECTION
Relevant articles published between January 1994 and July 2013 were collected from Pubmed database, Google scholar and hand searched journals of Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental materials.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Variables that influence the test outcome are categorized into substrate related factors, factors related to specimen properties, specimen preparation and test methodology. Impact of these variables on the test outcome is critically analyzed.
CONCLUSION
Micro-bond tests are more reliable than macro-bond tests. However, no standard format exists for reporting the bond strength tests which could lead to misinterpretation of the data and bonding abilities of adhesives.
背景
宏观粘结强度测试导致内聚破坏并高估了粘结强度。为减少这些缺陷，引入了微观粘结强度测试。它们是最常用的粘结强度测试方法。
目的
因此，本综述的目的是批判性地评价用于评估树脂与牙齿界面的微观粘结强度测试的可靠性。
数据收集
从PubMed数据库、谷歌学术以及手动检索的保守牙科、牙髓病学和牙科材料期刊中收集了1994年1月至2013年7月期间发表的相关文章。
数据综合
将影响测试结果的变量分为与基底相关的因素、与样本特性相关的因素、样本制备和测试方法。对这些变量对测试结果的影响进行了批判性分析。
结论
微观粘结测试比宏观粘结测试更可靠。然而，对于粘结强度测试没有标准的报告格式，这可能导致对数据和粘合剂粘结能力的误解。
Zotero 插件