• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村地区药店紧急避孕药咨询的流行病学分析。

Emergency Oral Contraceptive Consultations in Pharmacies in a Rural Setting: An Epidemiological Analysis.

机构信息

Murray Learning Centre, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2022 Apr;35(2):256-262. doi: 10.1177/0897190020961698. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1177/0897190020961698
PMID:32990131
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9087313/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency contraception has been available in pharmacies across England since 2001.There is a paucity of evidence describing those women accessing the service, particularly in rural locations, where pharmacies are integral to improving healthcare accessibility.

METHODS

Routinely collected data from all pharmacy consultations for emergency contraception in Shropshire, England, were obtained and anonymized for the study period April 1, 2016 to January 31, 2019. Consultations were described by time, age of consultee, rationale for consultation, method dispensed (levonorgestrel or ulipristal acetate), referral for copper intrauterine device fitting, chlamydia screening where appropriate and reason for choosing pharmacy setting. Repeat attenders were also described separately.

RESULTS

3499 consultations occurred during the study period; 39% were aged between 16-20 years, and 52% attended following unprotected sexual intercourse. Levonorgestrel was initially most prescribed, however ulipristal acetate overtook it in 2018. Onward referral for copper intrauterine device and age-appropriate chlamydia screening took place in 3% and 4% of the eligible populations respectively. Women overwhelmingly chose the pharmacy setting owing to its convenience. Repeat attenders tended to be younger than single attenders, but otherwise similar.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacy-based emergency contraception is an important and well-utilized service in this rural location and continued funding and possible service expansion should be considered.

摘要

背景

自 2001 年以来,紧急避孕措施在英格兰各地的药店均可获得。但是,关于使用该服务的女性的相关证据很少,尤其是在农村地区,那里的药店是改善医疗服务可及性的重要组成部分。

方法

本研究获取了英格兰什罗普郡所有药店提供紧急避孕服务的常规咨询数据,并在研究期间(2016 年 4 月 1 日至 2019 年 1 月 31 日)对其进行了匿名处理。根据时间、咨询人年龄、咨询理由、所分发的方法(左炔诺孕酮或乌利司他)、是否转诊以适配铜宫内节育器、是否进行适当的衣原体筛查以及选择药店的原因对咨询进行了描述。还分别描述了重复就诊者的情况。

结果

在研究期间共发生了 3499 次咨询;39%的咨询人年龄在 16-20 岁之间,52%的咨询人是在没有进行保护的性行为后就诊的。最初最常开的是左炔诺孕酮,但在 2018 年乌利司他超过了它。符合条件的人群中,分别有 3%和 4%的人被转介接受铜宫内节育器和适龄的衣原体筛查。女性选择药店主要是因为其便利性。重复就诊者往往比单次就诊者年轻,但其他方面相似。

结论

在这个农村地区,基于药店的紧急避孕措施是一项重要且利用率高的服务,应继续考虑为其提供资金并可能扩大服务范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92cd/9087313/29a13e5f4b23/10.1177_0897190020961698-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92cd/9087313/d1a9605d352d/10.1177_0897190020961698-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92cd/9087313/9e31cc088293/10.1177_0897190020961698-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92cd/9087313/eb533375382f/10.1177_0897190020961698-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92cd/9087313/29a13e5f4b23/10.1177_0897190020961698-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92cd/9087313/d1a9605d352d/10.1177_0897190020961698-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92cd/9087313/9e31cc088293/10.1177_0897190020961698-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92cd/9087313/eb533375382f/10.1177_0897190020961698-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92cd/9087313/29a13e5f4b23/10.1177_0897190020961698-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Emergency Oral Contraceptive Consultations in Pharmacies in a Rural Setting: An Epidemiological Analysis.农村地区药店紧急避孕药咨询的流行病学分析。
J Pharm Pract. 2022 Apr;35(2):256-262. doi: 10.1177/0897190020961698. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共4部分,第1部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
3
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
4
Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis.依托孕烯醇酮醋酸酯与左炔诺孕酮用于紧急避孕的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验及荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2010 Feb 13;375(9714):555-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60101-8. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
5
Accessibility of oral emergency contraceptives in Australian community pharmacies.澳大利亚社区药店的口服紧急避孕药可及性。
Contraception. 2024 Sep;137:110480. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110480. Epub 2024 May 4.
6
Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year.1 年内紧急避孕方案的成本效益。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):508.e1-508.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
Provision of the progestogen-only pill by community pharmacies as bridging contraception for women receiving emergency contraception: the Bridge-it RCT.社区药房提供仅孕激素避孕药作为接受紧急避孕药女性的桥接避孕措施:Bridge-it RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(27):1-92. doi: 10.3310/hta25270.
8
Pharmacist recommendations for emergency contraception in Belgium: a simulated user study.比利时药剂师对紧急避孕的推荐:一项模拟用户研究。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2024 Aug;29(4):177-181. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2024.2345114. Epub 2024 May 9.
9
Emergency Contraception Access and Counseling in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Pharmacies in Georgia.佐治亚州大城市和非大城市药房的紧急避孕药物获取与咨询服务
J Pharm Pract. 2023 Jun;36(3):523-531. doi: 10.1177/08971900211052821. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
10
The Quality of Counselling for Oral Emergency Contraceptive Pills-A Simulated Patient Study in German Community Pharmacies.《德国社区药店口服紧急避孕药咨询质量:一项模拟患者研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;17(18):6720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186720.

本文引用的文献

1
A 5-year evaluation of the emergency contraception enhanced community pharmacy service provided in Wales.对威尔士提供的紧急避孕强化社区药房服务的五年评估。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200236.
2
Spatial Accessibility of Primary Care in England: A Cross-Sectional Study Using a Floating Catchment Area Method.英格兰初级医疗的空间可达性:使用浮动服务区方法的横断面研究。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1957-1978. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12731. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
3
Current controversies with oral emergency contraception.
目前口服紧急避孕药的争议。
BJOG. 2017 Dec;124(13):1948-1956. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14773. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
Pharmacy provision of sexual and reproductive health commodities to young people: a systematic literature review and synthesis of the evidence.药房向年轻人提供性健康和生殖健康商品:系统文献综述与证据综合
Contraception. 2017 Apr;95(4):339-363. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
5
Access to chlamydia testing in remote and rural Scotland.在苏格兰偏远农村地区进行衣原体检测的情况。
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3588. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
6
Provision of contraception after emergency contraception from the pharmacy: evaluating the acceptability of pharmacy for providing sexual and reproductive health services.药店提供紧急避孕后的避孕措施:评估药店提供性与生殖健康服务的可接受性。
Public Health. 2016 Jun;135:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.11.017. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Initiatives to close the gap in inequalities in abortion provision in a remote and rural UK setting.在英国偏远农村地区缩小堕胎服务不平等差距的举措。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016 Jan;42(1):68-70. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101196. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Access all areas? An area-level analysis of accessibility to general practice and community pharmacy services in England by urbanity and social deprivation.全面覆盖?按城市化程度和社会剥夺程度对英格兰全科医疗和社区药房服务可及性进行的区域层面分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 May 8;5(5):e007328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007328.
9
Pharmacy-based interventions for initiating effective contraception following the use of emergency contraception: a pilot study.基于药房的紧急避孕后启动有效避孕措施的干预措施:一项试点研究。
Contraception. 2014 Oct;90(4):447-53. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 14.
10
Can we reduce costs and prevent more unintended pregnancies? A cost of illness and cost-effectiveness study comparing two methods of EHC.我们能否降低成本并防止更多意外怀孕?一项比较两种紧急避孕方法的疾病成本和成本效益研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 18;3(12):e003815. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003815.