Heart Rhythm Center, Heart Institute, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):274-283. doi: 10.1111/pace.14083. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
Post-ablation atrial tachycardias (ATs) are characterized by low-voltage signals that challenge current mapping methods. In this study, we analyzed common mistakes during activation mapping and delineated a mapping strategy for correct interpretation of tachycardia mechanisms in patients with challenging underlying substrate.
Thirty-one patients referred for AT ablation were selected for the study. Three types of incorrect activation patterns were identified, which were referred to as unrecognized block line (pseudo-macroreentry and pseudo-fig-8 reentry), incorrect activation timing window of interest (WOI) (chaotic activation), and mis-annotation of complex signals (multiple sites of "early meets late"). Pseudo-macroreentry and chaotic activation occur in focal or localized reentry AT with the error related to the WOI selection (four cases), incorrect annotation of local activation time (six cases), or a previous line of atrial block in (seven cases). Pseudo-fig-8 reentry (five cases) and multiple sites of "early meets late" (nine cases) occur in macroreentrant AT with blocked areas and low-voltage atrial substrate. All ATs were successfully eliminated at the origin site.
We delineated a series of ATs in the setting of a disordered pattern of activation mapping encountered in patients after previous extensive ablation or atriotomy. The algorithm proposed rapidly corrects the activation map and identifies the mechanism of the AT.
消融后的房性心动过速(AT)的特征是存在低电压信号,这对目前的激动标测方法提出了挑战。在本研究中,我们分析了激动标测过程中的常见错误,并提出了一种标测策略,以正确解释在具有挑战性的潜在基质的患者中发生的心动过速机制。
选择了 31 例因 AT 消融而转诊的患者进行研究。确定了三种类型的不正确激动模式,分别称为未识别阻滞线(假性大折返和假性 fig-8 折返)、感兴趣的激活时窗错误(混沌激活)和复杂信号的错误注释(多个“早相遇晚”部位)。假性大折返和混沌激活发生在局灶性或局限性折返性 AT 中,与 WOI 选择相关的错误(4 例)、局部激活时间的错误注释(6 例)或之前的心房阻滞线(7 例)有关。假性 fig-8 折返(5 例)和多个“早相遇晚”部位(9 例)发生在存在阻滞区和低电压心房基质的大折返性 AT 中。所有的 AT 均在起源部位被成功消除。
我们在先前广泛消融或心房切开术后患者的激活图出现紊乱模式的情况下,确定了一系列 AT。所提出的算法可以快速纠正激动图并识别 AT 的机制。