Suppr超能文献

成人免疫科原发性免疫缺陷病诊断评分系统分析。

Analysis of scoring systems for primary immunodeficiency diagnosis in adult immunology clinics.

机构信息

School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Infectious Diseases, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Clin Exp Immunol. 2021 Jan;203(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/cei.13526. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Abstract

Failure to spot the signs of primary immunodeficiency (PID) often results in delayed diagnosis. Scoring systems to identify PID exist, such as the immunodeficiency disease-related (IDR) score. This research aims to analyse and improve the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the IDR scoring system in a small preselected group of adult patients referred to immunology with clinical suspicion of a PID. Records of all patients presenting for the first time to an adult immunology clinic in 2018 at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, were scored using the unmodified IDR score and modified versions of it. Included records were searched for a subsequent diagnosis of PID, and the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the scoring systems were analysed. Of 400 patients, 213 were excluded: 141 due to secondary immunodeficiency, 69 due to no clinical suspicion of a PID, and hence no investigation for PID, and three due to ongoing diagnostic investigations. Of 187 included patients, 71 were found to have a clinically significant PID. The unmodified IDR score was useful in discriminating between those with and without PID. Modification of the scoring system with seven additional criteria improved the sensitivity and specificity for PID diagnosis to the greatest extent. A modified IDR score with seven additional criteria validated in adults referred to immunology with suspicion of a PID could be used clinically to aid PID diagnosis, although further validation in different patient cohorts is required before it is used in other contexts.

摘要

未能发现原发性免疫缺陷(PID)的迹象通常会导致诊断延误。目前已经存在用于识别 PID 的评分系统,例如免疫缺陷相关疾病(IDR)评分。本研究旨在分析和提高 IDR 评分系统在一小部分预先选定的成年患者中的诊断敏感性和特异性,这些患者因临床怀疑 PID 而被转介至免疫学。2018 年,在剑桥的阿登布鲁克医院,对首次就诊于成人免疫学诊所的所有患者的记录使用未经修改的 IDR 评分和其修改版本进行评分。对包含的记录进行搜索,以寻找 PID 的后续诊断,并分析评分系统的诊断敏感性和特异性。在 400 名患者中,有 213 名被排除在外:141 名因继发性免疫缺陷,69 名因无 PID 的临床怀疑,因此未对 PID 进行调查,还有 3 名因正在进行诊断性调查。在纳入的 187 名患者中,有 71 名被发现患有临床意义重大的 PID。未经修改的 IDR 评分可用于区分 PID 患者和非 PID 患者。通过增加七个额外标准对评分系统进行修改,可最大程度地提高 PID 诊断的敏感性和特异性。经过验证的改良 IDR 评分,适用于怀疑患有 PID 而转介至免疫学的成年人,可以在临床上用于辅助 PID 诊断,但需要在不同患者群体中进一步验证,然后才能在其他情况下使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/7744492/280df6605902/CEI-203-47-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验