• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同表面处理的氧化锆或钛基台种植体表面形成生物膜的基因组评估:一项体外研究。

Genomic Evaluation of Formed Biofilm on Dental Implants with Different Surface Treatments Associated with Zirconia or Titanium Abutments: An In Vitro Study.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Sep/Oct;35(5):888-899. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8239.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.8239
PMID:32991638
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the formed biofilm on two types of implant surfaces (hydrophilic or hydrophobic) associated with titanium (Ti) or zirconia (Zn) abutments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples were separated into four groups according to type of surface and abutment used (n = 10): (1) hydrophobic/Ti abutment, (2) hydrophilic/Ti abutment, (3) hydrophobic/Zn abutment, and (4) hydrophilic/Zn abutment. Implant-abutment assemblies were incubated with human saliva and supragingival biofilm. Samples of biofilm were evaluated by DNA Checkerboard hybridization, identifying up to 41 species. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained from the implants and abutments.

RESULTS

The microbial count was higher for samples from groups with the hydrophilic/Ti abutment, followed by hydrophobic/Zn abutment, hydrophilic/Ti abutment, and hydrophobic/Zn abutment (P < .05). Hydrophilic surfaces and Zn abutments showed the highest counts of microorganisms. Individual bacterial counts were variable between groups; the hydrophilic/Zn abutment group had the highest microbial diversity, including T forsythia, P nigrescens, S oralis, S sanguinis, L casei, M orale, P aeruginosa, P endodontalis, S aureus, S gallolyticus, S mutans, S parasanguinis, S pneumoniae, and C albicans. The hydrophilic/Ti abutment group had the highest count of T forsythia and T denticola, microorganisms of Socransky red complex. The SEM images showed the bacterial colonization in both surfaces of the implant and abutment.

CONCLUSION

Different surfaces of implants and abutments showed significant differences in the count and diversity of species. The hydrophilic/Zn abutment group presented the highest count and diversity of target species.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估与钛(Ti)或氧化锆(Zn)基台相关的两种种植体表面(亲水或疏水)形成的生物膜。

材料和方法

根据使用的表面和基台类型,将样本分为四组(n = 10):(1)疏水/Ti 基台,(2)亲水/Ti 基台,(3)疏水/Zn 基台和(4)亲水/Zn 基台。将种植体-基台组件与人类唾液和龈上生物膜孵育。通过 DNA checkerboard 杂交评估生物膜样本,可鉴定多达 41 种物种。从种植体和基台获得扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像。

结果

亲水/Ti 基台组的微生物计数高于其他组,其次是疏水/Zn 基台组、亲水/Ti 基台组和疏水/Zn 基台组(P <.05)。亲水表面和 Zn 基台显示出最高的微生物计数。各组之间的个体细菌计数存在差异;亲水/Zn 基台组的微生物多样性最高,包括 T forsythia、P nigrescens、S oralis、S sanguinis、L casei、M orale、P aeruginosa、P endodontalis、S aureus、S gallolyticus、S mutans、S parasanguinis、S pneumoniae 和 C albicans。亲水/Ti 基台组的 T forsythia 和 T denticola 计数最高,这两种微生物属于 Socransky 红色复合体。SEM 图像显示了种植体和基台表面的细菌定植。

结论

种植体和基台的不同表面在物种的计数和多样性方面存在显著差异。亲水/Zn 基台组显示出目标物种的最高计数和多样性。

相似文献

1
Genomic Evaluation of Formed Biofilm on Dental Implants with Different Surface Treatments Associated with Zirconia or Titanium Abutments: An In Vitro Study.不同表面处理的氧化锆或钛基台种植体表面形成生物膜的基因组评估:一项体外研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Sep/Oct;35(5):888-899. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8239.
2
Early and mature biofilm on four different dental implant materials: An in vivo human study.四种不同牙种植体材料早期及成熟期细菌生物膜的体内人研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Nov;31(11):1094-1104. doi: 10.1111/clr.13656. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.钛-钛及钛-氧化锆种植体-基台界面的磨损:一项体外比较研究。
Dent Mater. 2012 Dec;28(12):1215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
4
Wear of Morse taper and external hexagon implant joints after abutment removal.基台拆除后莫氏锥度和外六角种植体连接部位的磨损。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017 May;28(5):65. doi: 10.1007/s10856-017-5879-6. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
5
Effect of titanium and zirconia dental implant abutments on a cultivable polymicrobial saliva community.钛和氧化锆牙科种植体基台对可培养多微生物唾液群落的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Oct;118(4):481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
6
Fracture strength study of internally connected zirconia abutments reinforced with titanium inserts.采用钛植入物增强的内部连接氧化锆基台的断裂强度研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):346-50. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3768.
7
Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下种植体与钛和氧化锆基台对牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和具核梭杆菌的封闭能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
8
Differences in micromorphology of the implant-abutment junction for original and third-party abutments on a representative dental implant.代表性种植体中原装和第三方基台的种植体-基台连接部微观形态的差异。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
9
Wear at the Implant-Abutment Interface of Zirconia Abutments Manufactured by Three CAD/CAM Systems.三种CAD/CAM系统制造的氧化锆基台种植体-基台界面处的磨损情况
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Nov/Dec;32(6):1241-1250. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5507.
10
Bacterial adhesion on the titanium and zirconia abutment surfaces.细菌在钛和氧化锆基台表面的黏附。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Mar;25(3):337-343. doi: 10.1111/clr.12093. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Microbiome on the Surface of Corroded Titanium Dental Implants in Patients with Periimplantitis and Diode Laser Irradiation as an Aid in the Implant Prosthetic Treatment: An Ex Vivo Study.种植体周围炎患者中腐蚀钛牙种植体表面微生物群分析及二极管激光照射在种植修复治疗中的辅助作用:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;15(17):5890. doi: 10.3390/ma15175890.