Department of Radiology, University Hospital Centre Angers, France.
Department of Hepatology, University Hospital Centre Angers, France.
Ultraschall Med. 2022 Oct;43(5):479-487. doi: 10.1055/a-1233-2290. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the hepatorenal index ratio of Supersonic Imagine (B-mode ratio) and the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) of FibroScan for the noninvasive diagnosis and grading of steatosis.
Two centers prospectively included patients who underwent liver biopsy, B-mode ratio and CAP evaluation all on the same day between June 2017 and July 2019. MRI and histological morphometry were also performed in center 1. Histology (classic semiquantitative score and morphometry) was used as the reference.
Concerning the B-mode ratio, the AUROCs for ≥ S1, ≥ S2 and ≥ S3 were respectively 0.896 ± 0.20, 0.775 ± 0.30 and 0.729 ± 0.39 with the best cut-off values being 1.22 for ≥ S1 (Se = 76.4 %, Sp = 93.2 %), 1.42 for ≥ S2 (Se = 70.2 %, Sp = 71.2 %) and 1.54 for ≥ S3 (Se = 68.4 %, Sp = 69.8 %). The correlation between the B-mode ratio and morphometry was moderate (Rs = 0.575, p < 0.001) and the correlation between the B-mode ratio and MRI was good (Rs = 0.613, p < 0.001). Concerning the CAP, the AUROCs for ≥ S1, ≥ S2 and ≥ S3 were 0.926 ± 0.18, 0.760 ± 0.30 and 0.701 ± 0.40, respectively, with the best cut-off values being 271 dB/m for ≥ S1 (Se = 84 %, Sp = 88.2 %), 331 dB/m for ≥ S2 (Se = 64.5 %, Sp = 74.7 %) and 355 dB/m for ≥ S3 (Se = 55.3 %, Sp = 75.1 %). The correlation between the CAP and morphometry and between the CAP and MRI was moderate in both cases (Rs = 0.526, p < 0.001 and Rs = 0.397, p < 0.001, respectively). The B-mode ratio was better at ruling in and the CAP was better at ruling out the disease.
B-mode ratio and CAP show similar and good performance for the diagnosis of steatosis (≥ S1). However, both techniques are limited with respect to differentiating mild to moderate (≥ S2) or severe (≥ S3) steatosis.
本研究旨在评估 Supersonic Imagine(B 型比值)的肝肾功能指数比和 FibroScan 的受控衰减参数(CAP)在非侵入性诊断和分级脂肪变性中的作用。
2017 年 6 月至 2019 年 7 月,两个中心前瞻性地纳入了同一天接受肝脏活检、B 型比值和 CAP 评估的患者。中心 1 还进行了 MRI 和组织形态计量学检查。组织学(经典半定量评分和形态计量学)被用作参考。
就 B 型比值而言,≥S1、≥S2 和≥S3 的 AUROCs 分别为 0.896±0.20、0.775±0.30 和 0.729±0.39,最佳截断值分别为 1.22(Se=76.4%,Sp=93.2%)用于≥S1、1.42(Se=70.2%,Sp=71.2%)用于≥S2 和 1.54(Se=68.4%,Sp=69.8%)用于≥S3。B 型比值与形态计量学之间的相关性为中度(Rs=0.575,p<0.001),B 型比值与 MRI 之间的相关性良好(Rs=0.613,p<0.001)。就 CAP 而言,≥S1、≥S2 和≥S3 的 AUROCs 分别为 0.926±0.18、0.760±0.30 和 0.701±0.40,最佳截断值分别为 271dB/m(Se=84%,Sp=88.2%)用于≥S1、331dB/m(Se=64.5%,Sp=74.7%)用于≥S2 和 355dB/m(Se=55.3%,Sp=75.1%)用于≥S3。CAP 与形态计量学和 CAP 与 MRI 之间的相关性在两种情况下均为中度(Rs=0.526,p<0.001 和 Rs=0.397,p<0.001)。B 型比值更适合诊断,而 CAP 更适合排除疾病。
B 型比值和 CAP 在诊断脂肪变性(≥S1)方面表现相似且良好。然而,这两种技术在区分轻度至中度(≥S2)或重度(≥S3)脂肪变性方面都存在局限性。