Chiang Camilo, Bånkestad Daniel, Hoch Günter
Department of Environmental Sciences-Botany, University of Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 6, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Research and Development, Heliospectra, Fiskhamnsgatan 2, 414 58 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Plants (Basel). 2020 Sep 27;9(10):1273. doi: 10.3390/plants9101273.
To transfer experimental findings in plant research to natural ecosystems it is imperative to reach near to natural-like plant performance. Previous studies propose differences in temperature and light quantity as main sources of deviations between indoor and outdoor plant growth. With increasing implementation of light emitting diodes (LED) in plant growth facilities, light quality is yet another factor that can be optimised to prevent unnatural plant performance. We investigated the effects of different wavelength combinations in phytotrons (i.e., indoor growth chambers) on plant growth and physiology in seven different plant species from different plant functional types (herbs, grasses and trees). The results from these experiments were compared against a previous field trial with the same set of species. While different proportions of blue (B) and red (R) light were applied in the phytotrons, the mean environmental conditions (photoperiod, total radiation, red to far red ratio and day/night temperature and air humidity) from the field trial were used in the phytotrons in order to assess which wavelength combinations result in the most natural-like plant performance. Different plant traits and physiological parameters, including biomass productivity, specific leaf area (SLA), leaf pigmentation, photosynthesis under a standardised light, and the respective growing light and chlorophyll fluorescence, were measured at the end of each treatment. The exposure to different B percentages induced species-specific dose response reactions for most of the analysed parameters. Compared with intermediate B light treatments (25 and/or 35% B light), extreme R or B light enriched treatments (6% and 62% of B respectively) significantly affected the height, biomass, biomass allocation, chlorophyll content, and photosynthesis parameters, differently among species. Principal component analyses (PCA) confirmed that 6% and 62% B light quality combinations induce more extreme plant performance in most cases, indicating that light quality needs to be adjusted to mitigate unnatural plant responses under indoor conditions.
为了将植物研究中的实验结果应用于自然生态系统,实现接近自然状态的植物生长表现至关重要。先前的研究表明,温度和光量的差异是室内和室外植物生长偏差的主要来源。随着发光二极管(LED)在植物生长设施中的应用越来越广泛,光质成为另一个可以优化的因素,以防止植物生长表现不自然。我们研究了植物培养箱(即室内生长室)中不同波长组合对来自不同植物功能类型(草本植物、禾本科植物和树木)的七种不同植物物种的生长和生理的影响。将这些实验结果与之前对同一组物种进行的田间试验结果进行了比较。在植物培养箱中应用了不同比例的蓝光(B)和红光(R),同时使用田间试验的平均环境条件(光周期、总辐射、红到远红比率以及昼夜温度和空气湿度),以评估哪种波长组合能产生最接近自然状态的植物生长表现。在每个处理结束时,测量了不同的植物性状和生理参数,包括生物量生产力、比叶面积(SLA)、叶片色素沉着、标准化光照下的光合作用以及各自的生长光照和叶绿素荧光。对于大多数分析参数,不同蓝光百分比的处理引发了物种特异性的剂量反应。与中等蓝光处理(25%和/或35%蓝光)相比,极端红光或蓝光富集处理(分别为6%和62%的蓝光)对植物高度、生物量、生物量分配、叶绿素含量和光合作用参数有显著影响,不同物种之间存在差异。主成分分析(PCA)证实,在大多数情况下,6%和62%的蓝光质量组合会导致更极端的植物生长表现,这表明需要调整光质以减轻室内条件下不自然的植物反应。