• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用 SERVQUAL 工具和重要性绩效分析识别医疗保健服务中的质量差距:台湾一家医疗中心的前瞻性研究。

Identification of quality gaps in healthcare services using the SERVQUAL instrument and importance-performance analysis in medical intensive care: a prospective study at a medical center in Taiwan.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.

Department of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science, No. 365, Ming-Te Road, Pei-Tou District, Taipei, 11219, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):908. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05764-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05764-8
PMID:32993641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7523493/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessing patients' expectations and perceptions of health service delivery is challenging. To understand the service quality in intensive care units (ICUs), we investigated the expected and perceived service quality of ICU care.

METHODS

We conducted this study at an ICU of a university-affiliated medical center in Taiwan from April to September 2019. Admitted patients or their family members responded to a questionnaire survey adopted from the SERVQUAL instrument consisting of 22 items in five dimensions. The questionnaire was provided on ICU admission for expectation and before ICU discharge for perception. We analyzed the quality gaps between the surveys and applied important-performance analysis (IPA).

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients were included (62.4% males, average age: 65.9 years, average length of stay: 10.1 days, and 76.9% survival to ICU discharge). The overall weighted mean scores for the surveys were similar (4.57 ± 0.81 and 4.58 ± 0.52, respectively). The 'tangibles' dimension had a higher perception than expectation (3.99 ± 0.55 and 4.31 ± 0.63 for expectation and perception, respectively, p < 0.001). IPA showed that most of the items in 'reliability,' 'responsiveness' and 'assurance' were located in the quadrant of high expectation and high perception, whereas most of the items in 'tangibles' and 'empathy' were located in the quadrant of low expectation and low perception. One item (item 1 for 'tangibles') was found in the quadrant of high expectation and low perception.

CONCLUSIONS

The SERVQUAL approach and IPA might provide useful information regarding the feedback by patients and their families for ICU service quality. In most aspects, the performance of the ICU satisfactorily matched the needs perceived by the patients and their families.

摘要

背景

评估患者对医疗服务提供的期望和看法具有挑战性。为了了解重症监护病房(ICU)的服务质量,我们调查了 ICU 护理的预期和感知服务质量。

方法

我们于 2019 年 4 月至 9 月在台湾一家大学附属医院的 ICU 进行了这项研究。入住患者或其家属回答了一份从 SERVQUAL 工具中采用的问卷,该问卷包含五个维度的 22 个项目。问卷在 ICU 入院时用于期望调查,在 ICU 出院前用于感知调查。我们分析了调查之间的质量差距,并应用了重要绩效分析(IPA)。

结果

共纳入 117 例患者(62.4%为男性,平均年龄为 65.9 岁,平均住院时间为 10.1 天,76.9%存活至 ICU 出院)。调查的总体加权平均得分相似(分别为 4.57±0.81 和 4.58±0.52)。“有形性”维度的感知得分高于期望得分(期望和感知分别为 4.31±0.63 和 3.99±0.55,p<0.001)。IPA 显示,“可靠性”、“响应性”和“保证性”大部分项目位于期望和感知均较高的象限,而“有形性”和“同理关怀”大部分项目位于期望和感知均较低的象限。一个项目(“有形性”的第 1 项)位于期望和感知均较高的象限。

结论

SERVQUAL 方法和 IPA 可能为患者及其家属提供有关 ICU 服务质量的反馈信息。在大多数方面,ICU 的表现符合患者及其家属感知到的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34be/7525939/3fb57eace0cd/12913_2020_5764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34be/7525939/3fb57eace0cd/12913_2020_5764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34be/7525939/3fb57eace0cd/12913_2020_5764_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification of quality gaps in healthcare services using the SERVQUAL instrument and importance-performance analysis in medical intensive care: a prospective study at a medical center in Taiwan.运用 SERVQUAL 工具和重要性绩效分析识别医疗保健服务中的质量差距:台湾一家医疗中心的前瞻性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):908. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05764-8.
2
Quality gaps and priorities for improvement of healthcare service for patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation in the view of family.从家庭角度看,改善长期机械通气患者医疗服务质量的差距和重点。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 May;118(5):922-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
3
Measuring patient's expectation and the perception of quality in LASIK services.测量患者对LASIK手术服务的期望和质量感知。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Jul 10;7:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-63.
4
Service quality of private hospitals: the Iranian patients' perspective.私立医院服务质量:伊朗患者视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb 2;12:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-31.
5
Chronic kidney-disease screening service quality: questionnaire survey research evidence from Taichung City.慢性肾脏病筛检服务品质:台中市问卷调查研究证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec 19;9:239. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-239.
6
Expectations and perceptions of clients concerning the quality of care provided at a Brazilian hospital facility.巴西某医院提供的护理服务的客户期望和认知。
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Feb;39:211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
7
Assessing Quality Gap of Outpatient Service in Public Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.评估公立医院门诊服务质量差距:中国的一项横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231162527. doi: 10.1177/00469580231162527.
8
Evaluation of service quality of hospital outpatient department services.医院门诊服务质量评估。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2011 Jul;67(3):221-4. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(11)60045-2. Epub 2011 Aug 7.
9
[Care quality in intensive care evaluated by the patients using a service quality scale (SERVQUAL)].患者使用服务质量量表(SERVQUAL)对重症监护中的护理质量进行评估
Enferm Intensiva. 2010 Jan-Mar;21(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2009.10.001. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
10
The Servqual Method as an Assessment Tool of the Quality of Medical Services in Selected Asian Countries.《 SERVQUAL 方法在选定亚洲国家医疗服务质量评估中的应用》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 26;19(13):7831. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137831.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Patients' Quality of Care in Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Narrative Literature Review.医疗保健系统中患者护理质量评估:一项全面的叙述性文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;13(14):1714. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141714.
2
Satisfaction with healthcare services and related factors among Indonesian migrant workers in Taiwan: a cross-sectional survey study.台湾印尼移工对医疗服务的满意度及相关因素:一项横断面调查研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12722-9.
3
Gap analysis of maternity service quality and associated factors at a maternity hospital in northwest Iran: a cross-sectional survey using SERVQUAL and HEALTHQUAL questionnaires.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating and prioritizing hospital service quality.评估医院服务质量并确定其优先级。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Mar 11;32(2):332-346. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2018-0082.
2
Development of a quality indicator set to measure and improve quality of ICU care for patients with traumatic brain injury.开发一套质量指标集,以衡量和改善创伤性脑损伤患者 ICU 护理质量。
Crit Care. 2019 Mar 22;23(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2377-x.
3
Quality gaps and priorities for improvement of healthcare service for patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation in the view of family.
伊朗西北部一家妇产医院的孕产妇服务质量及其相关因素的差距分析:一项使用SERVQUAL和HEALTHQUAL问卷的横断面调查
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07179-x.
4
Service quality evaluation of county-level public hospitals in Chongqing under smart healthcare.智慧医疗背景下重庆市县级公立医院服务质量评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1492. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11976-z.
5
Evaluating perceived value and expected value gaps based on patient experience during outpatient encounters: An empirical study in China.基于门诊就医过程中患者体验评估感知价值与期望价值差距:一项中国的实证研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 11;10(18):e37766. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37766. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
6
Understanding International Students' Perspective of Health Service Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Hungarian University.了解国际学生对医疗服务质量的看法:匈牙利一所大学的横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Jul 3;17:1757-1769. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S460534. eCollection 2024.
7
Exploring Consumers' Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth of 5 Military Hospitals in Taiwan Through SERVQUAL and Flower of Services: Web Scraping Analysis.通过SERVQUAL和服务之花模型探索台湾五家军事医院消费者的负面电子口碑:网络爬虫分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 29;8:e54334. doi: 10.2196/54334.
8
Importance-Performance Analysis of Clinical Forensic Services Quality at Bhayangkara Hospital Pekanbaru, Indonesia.印度尼西亚北干巴鲁市巴杨卡拉医院临床法医服务质量的重要性-绩效分析。
Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Feb;31(1):103-113. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.1.9. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
Patient perception of service quality to preanesthetic oral examination: a cross-sectional study using the SERVQUAL model.患者对术前口腔检查服务质量的感知:使用 SERVQUAL 模型的横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 22;24(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03853-2.
10
Gap analysis of service quality and associated factors at the oncology center of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2022: a cross-sectional study.2022 年,埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴提克里安巴萨专科医院肿瘤中心服务质量及相关因素的差距分析:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 8;14(1):e078239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078239.
从家庭角度看,改善长期机械通气患者医疗服务质量的差距和重点。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 May;118(5):922-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
4
Analysis of the difference between importance and satisfaction of the needs of family members of critical patients.危重症患者家属需求重要性与满意度的差异分析
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2019 May;43(4):217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
5
Patient and family description of receiving care in acuity adaptable care model.患者及家属对在 acuity adaptable care model 中接受护理的描述。 (注:“acuity adaptable care model”可能是一种特定的护理模式,但因无更多背景信息,只能直接保留英文表述)
J Nurs Manag. 2018 Oct;26(7):874-880. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12618. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
6
Patient-perceived hospital service quality: an empirical assessment.患者感知的医院服务质量:一项实证评估。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Feb 12;31(1):76-91. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2017-0064.
7
Managing in-hospital quality improvement: An importance-performance analysis to set priorities for ST-elevation myocardial infarction care.管理医院内质量改进:一项重要性-绩效分析,为ST段抬高型心肌梗死护理设定优先事项。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Aug;17(6):535-542. doi: 10.1177/1474515118759065. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
8
Service quality benchmarking via a novel approach based on fuzzy ELECTRE III and IPA: an empirical case involving the Italian public healthcare context.基于模糊 ELECTRE III 和 IPA 的新型方法进行服务质量基准测试:涉及意大利公共医疗保健背景的实证案例。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Mar;22(1):106-120. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9424-4. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
9
Hospital responsiveness and its effect on overall patient satisfaction.医院响应能力及其对患者总体满意度的影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Oct 9;30(8):728-736. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2016-0098.
10
Patient participation in the intensive care unit.患者在重症监护病房中的参与度。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Oct;42:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 20.