Department of Farm Animals, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
BMC Vet Res. 2020 Sep 29;16(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02515-z.
Clinical signs of traumatic reticuloperitonitis and abomasal ulcer are often similar making the disorders difficult to differentiate. The goal of our study was to compare the frequency of individual clinical signs of cows with traumatic reticuloperitonitis and cows with abomasal ulcers and determine their diagnostic significance. The frequency of the findings "rectal temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, demeanour, signs of colic, arched back, abdominal guarding, bruxism, scleral vessels, rumen motility, foreign body tests, percussion auscultation, swinging auscultation and faecal colour" of cows with traumatic reticuloperitonitis (TRP, n = 503) and cows with type 1 (U1, n = 94), type 2 (U2, n = 145), type 3 (U3, n = 60), type 4 (U4, n = 87) and type 5 (U5, n = 14) abomasal ulcer were compared, and the reliability indices "diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratio" were calculated. A total of 182 healthy cows served as controls (control group).
None of the cows in the control group had colic, rumen atony or melena, 99% had no abnormalities in demeanor and appetite and did not have a rectal temperature of ≤38.6 or > 40.0 °C, a heart rate > 100 bpm or a respiratory rate > 55 breaths per min, and 95% did not have an arched back or bruxism. The control group was therefore ideal for comparative purposes. Many signs such as mild increase in rectal temperature, scleral congestion and positive foreign body test were non-diagnostic because they occurred in healthy as well as in ill cows. Likewise, differentiation of cows with TRP and abomasal ulcer was not possible based on single clinical variables; a detailed history and a comprehensive assessment of all clinical findings were required for this.
The findings of the present study serve as a guide for the veterinarian in the differentiation of cows with traumatic reticuloperitonitis and abomasal ulcer.
创伤性网胃腹膜炎和真胃溃疡的临床症状通常相似,因此很难区分这两种疾病。我们的研究目的是比较患有创伤性网胃腹膜炎和真胃溃疡的奶牛的个体临床症状出现的频率,并确定其诊断意义。比较了患有创伤性网胃腹膜炎(TRP,n=503)和患有 1 型(U1,n=94)、2 型(U2,n=145)、3 型(U3,n=60)、4 型(U4,n=87)和 5 型(U5,n=14)真胃溃疡的奶牛的“直肠温度、心率、呼吸频率、行为、腹痛迹象、弓背、腹部紧张、磨牙、巩膜血管、瘤胃蠕动、异物试验、叩诊听诊、摆动听诊和粪便颜色”等发现的频率,并计算了可靠性指数“诊断灵敏度和特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性似然比”。共有 182 头健康奶牛作为对照组(对照组)。
对照组中没有一头奶牛出现腹痛、瘤胃弛缓或黑便,99%的奶牛行为和食欲正常,直肠温度不低于 38.6°C 或高于 40.0°C,心率不高于 100 bpm 或呼吸频率不高于 55 次/分钟,95%的奶牛没有弓背或磨牙。因此,对照组非常适合进行比较。许多迹象,如直肠温度轻度升高、巩膜充血和异物试验阳性等,由于在健康牛和患病牛中都存在,因此没有诊断意义。同样,基于单个临床变量无法区分患有创伤性网胃腹膜炎和真胃溃疡的奶牛;需要详细的病史和对所有临床发现的综合评估。
本研究的结果为兽医区分创伤性网胃腹膜炎和真胃溃疡的奶牛提供了指导。