• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 ArmeoSpring 评估脑卒中后上肢运动学参数:指导参数使用的可靠性和学习效果研究。

Kinematic parameters obtained with the ArmeoSpring for upper-limb assessment after stroke: a reliability and learning effect study for guiding parameter use.

机构信息

ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France.

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Sep 29;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00759-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12984-020-00759-2
PMID:32993695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7523068/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After stroke, kinematic measures obtained with non-robotic and robotic devices are highly recommended to precisely quantify the sensorimotor impairments of the upper-extremity and select the most relevant therapeutic strategies. Although the ArmeoSpring exoskeleton has demonstrated its effectiveness in stroke motor rehabilitation, its interest as an assessment tool has not been sufficiently documented. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of selected kinematic parameters obtained with the ArmeoSpring in post-stroke patients.

METHODS

This study involved 30 post-stroke patients (mean age = 54.5 ± 16.4 years; time post-stroke = 14.7 ± 26.7 weeks; Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Score (UE-FMS) = 40.7 ± 14.5/66) who participated in 3 assessment sessions, each consisting of 10 repetitions of the 'horizontal catch' exercise. Five kinematic parameters (task and movement time, hand path ratio, peak velocity, number of peak velocity) and a global Score were computed from raw ArmeoSpring' data. Learning effect and retention were analyzed using a 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA, and reliability was investigated using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC).

RESULTS

We observed significant inter- and intra-session learning effects for most parameters except peak velocity. The measures performed in sessions 2 and 3 were significantly different from those of session 1. No additional significant difference was observed after the first 6 trials of each session and successful retention was also highlighted for all the parameters. Relative reliability was moderate to excellent for all the parameters, and MDC values expressed in percentage ranged from 42.6 to 102.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

After a familiarization session, the ArmeoSpring can be used to reliably and sensitively assess motor impairment and intervention effects on motor learning processes after a stroke. Trial registration The study was approved by the local hospital ethics committee in September 2016 and was registered under number 05-0916.

摘要

背景

在中风后,使用非机器人和机器人设备获得的运动学测量值可高度精确地量化上肢的感觉运动障碍,并选择最相关的治疗策略。尽管 ArmeoSpring 外骨骼已证明其在中风运动康复中的有效性,但作为评估工具的兴趣尚未得到充分证明。本研究的目的是调查中风患者使用 ArmeoSpring 获得的选定运动学参数的心理测量特性。

方法

这项研究涉及 30 名中风后患者(平均年龄= 54.5 ± 16.4 岁;中风后时间= 14.7 ± 26.7 周;上肢 Fugl-Meyer 评分(UE-FMS)= 40.7 ± 14.5/66),他们参加了 3 次评估会议,每次会议包括 10 次“水平捕获”运动。从原始 ArmeoSpring'数据中计算了 5 个运动学参数(任务和运动时间、手路径比、峰值速度、峰值速度数)和一个整体分数。使用 2 因素重复测量方差分析分析学习效果和保留,使用组内相关系数(ICC)和最小可检测变化(MDC)研究可靠性。

结果

除了峰值速度外,我们观察到大多数参数的组间和组内学习效果显著。第 2 次和第 3 次会议的测量值与第 1 次会议的测量值显著不同。在每个会议的前 6 次试验后,没有观察到其他显著差异,并且所有参数的保留也很成功。所有参数的相对可靠性为中等至优秀,以百分比表示的 MDC 值范围为 42.6%至 102.8%。

结论

在熟悉阶段之后,ArmeoSpring 可用于可靠且敏感地评估中风后运动障碍和对运动学习过程的干预效果。

试验注册

该研究于 2016 年 9 月获得当地医院伦理委员会的批准,并以编号 05-0916 进行了注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f90f/7523068/626f24758af0/12984_2020_759_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f90f/7523068/a266f09383b5/12984_2020_759_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f90f/7523068/626f24758af0/12984_2020_759_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f90f/7523068/a266f09383b5/12984_2020_759_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f90f/7523068/626f24758af0/12984_2020_759_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Kinematic parameters obtained with the ArmeoSpring for upper-limb assessment after stroke: a reliability and learning effect study for guiding parameter use.利用 ArmeoSpring 评估脑卒中后上肢运动学参数:指导参数使用的可靠性和学习效果研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Sep 29;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00759-2.
2
A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study.两种带和不带机器人驱动的外骨骼机器人在上肢康复中对脑卒中患者的效果和可用性的比较:一项单盲随机对照初步研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Oct 19;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00763-6.
3
Exoskeleton-Assisted Anthropomorphic Movement Training (EAMT) for Poststroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.外骨骼辅助仿人运动训练(EAMT)用于脑卒中后上肢康复:一项初步随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov;102(11):2074-2082. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke.在脑卒中后的外骨骼训练中,将运动学习与恢复区分开来。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Oct 5;15(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0428-1.
5
Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.不同机器人设备用于上肢康复的运动训练效果比较:一项回顾性研究
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;53(2):240-248. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04297-0. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
The Role of Robotic Path Assistance and Weight Support in Facilitating 3D Movements in Individuals With Poststroke Hemiparesis.机器人路径辅助和重量支持在促进脑卒中后偏瘫个体 3D 运动中的作用。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 Feb;34(2):134-147. doi: 10.1177/1545968319887685. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.通过使用机器人外骨骼进行训练来改变健康受试者上肢关节间的协调性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Jun 12;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0254-x.
8
Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.新型平面机器人上肢康复设备提供的仪器指标的可靠性、有效性和判别能力。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 May 16;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0385-8.
9
Exoskeleton-Assisted Anthropomorphic Movement Training for the Upper Limb After Stroke: The EAMT Randomized Trial.外骨骼辅助仿人上肢运动训练治疗脑卒中后上肢运动障碍:EAMT 随机试验
Stroke. 2023 Jun;54(6):1464-1473. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041480. Epub 2023 May 8.
10
Effects of a Soft Robotic Hand for Hand Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Survivors.软性机器人手对手康复对慢性中风幸存者的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Jul;30(7):105812. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105812. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in arm and hand function after four weeks robot-assisted arm training in stroke survivors.中风幸存者接受四周机器人辅助手臂训练后手臂和手部功能的变化。
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2025 Aug 14;12:20556683251358277. doi: 10.1177/20556683251358277. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Test-retest reliability of kinematic and EEG low-beta spectral features in a robot-based arm movement task.基于机器人的手臂运动任务中运动学和脑电图低β频谱特征的重测信度
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2025 Jun 18;11(4). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ade317.
3
Influence of virtual reality and task complexity on digital health metrics assessing upper limb function.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardized measurement of quality of upper limb movement after stroke: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.脑卒中后上肢运动质量的标准化测量:第二届脑卒中康复与修复圆桌会议达成共识的核心建议。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Oct;14(8):783-791. doi: 10.1177/1747493019873519. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
2
Systematic Review on Kinematic Assessments of Upper Limb Movements After Stroke.系统评价脑卒中后上肢运动的运动学评估。
Stroke. 2019 Mar;50(3):718-727. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023531.
3
Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke.
虚拟现实和任务复杂性对上肢功能数字健康指标的影响。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Jul 27;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01413-x.
4
Advances in the Application of AI Robots in Critical Care: Scoping Review.人工智能机器人在重症监护中的应用进展:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 27;26:e54095. doi: 10.2196/54095.
5
Correlation between kinetic and kinematic measures, clinical tests and subjective self-evaluation questionnaires of the affected upper limb in people after stroke.中风患者患侧上肢的动力学和运动学测量、临床测试与主观自我评价问卷之间的相关性。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Dec 4;17:1264513. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1264513. eCollection 2023.
6
Robot-Aided Motion Analysis in Neurorehabilitation: Benefits and Challenges.神经康复中的机器人辅助运动分析:益处与挑战
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 29;13(23):3561. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13233561.
7
Literature review of stroke assessment for upper-extremity physical function via EEG, EMG, kinematic, and kinetic measurements and their reliability.上肢物理功能的 EEG、EMG、运动学和动力学测量及其可靠性的中风评估文献综述。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Feb 15;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01142-7.
8
Psychometric properties of upper limb kinematics during functional tasks in children and adolescents with dyskinetic cerebral palsy.运动障碍型脑瘫患儿在完成功能性任务时上肢运动学的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 23;17(9):e0266294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266294. eCollection 2022.
9
Kinematic Assessment to Measure Change in Impairment during Active and Active-Assisted Type of Robotic Rehabilitation for Patients with Stroke.用于测量脑卒中患者在主动型和主动辅助型机器人康复治疗过程中功能障碍变化的运动学评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 25;21(21):7055. doi: 10.3390/s21217055.
10
Relative independence of upper limb position sense and reaching in children with hemiparetic perinatal stroke.围产期卒中所致偏瘫儿童上肢位置觉和伸手运动的相对独立性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 May 12;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00869-5.
在脑卒中后的外骨骼训练中,将运动学习与恢复区分开来。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Oct 5;15(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0428-1.
4
Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.新型平面机器人上肢康复设备提供的仪器指标的可靠性、有效性和判别能力。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 May 16;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0385-8.
5
Kinematic measures for upper limb robot-assisted therapy following stroke and correlations with clinical outcome measures: A review.中风后上肢机器人辅助治疗的运动学测量及其与临床结局指标的相关性:综述
Med Eng Phys. 2018 Mar;53:13-31. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.12.005. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Weight-supported training of the upper extremity in children with cerebral palsy: a motor learning study.脑瘫患儿上肢的减重支持训练:一项运动学习研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Aug 30;14(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0293-3.
7
Parameters and Measures in Assessment of Motor Learning in Neurorehabilitation; A Systematic Review of the Literature.神经康复中运动学习评估的参数与测量;文献系统综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 24;11:82. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00082. eCollection 2017.
8
Stroke.中风。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 11;389(10069):641-654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30962-X. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
Upper Limb Obstacle Avoidance Behavior in Individuals With Stroke.中风患者的上肢避障行为
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Feb;31(2):133-146. doi: 10.1177/1545968316662527. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
10
Effects of Arm Weight Support Training to Promote Recovery of Upper Limb Function for Subacute Patients after Stroke with Different Levels of Arm Impairments.手臂重量支持训练对不同程度上肢运动障碍的脑卒中亚急性期患者上肢功能恢复的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9346374. doi: 10.1155/2016/9346374. Epub 2016 Jul 19.