• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估蛋白生物标志物在术前鉴别卵巢良恶性肿瘤中的作用。

Assessment of protein biomarkers for preoperative differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.

机构信息

Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.

Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):811-819. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.025
PMID:32994054
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the diagnostic value of tumor and immune related proteins in the discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses, and between different subgroups of tumors.

METHODS

In this exploratory diagnostic study, 254 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were consecutively enrolled at the University Hospitals Leuven (128 benign, 42 borderline, 22 stage I, 55 stage II-IV, and 7 secondary metastatic tumors). The quantification of 33 serum proteins was done preoperatively, using multiplex high throughput immunoassays (Luminex) and electrochemiluminescence immuno-assay (ECLIA). We calculated univariable areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves (AUCs). To discriminate malignant from benign tumors, multivariable ridge logistic regression with backward elimination was performed, using bootstrapping to validate the resulting AUCs.

RESULTS

CA125 had the highest univariable AUC to discriminate malignant from benign tumors (0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.89). Combining CA125 with CA72.4 and HE4 increased the AUC to 0.87. For benign vs borderline tumors, CA125 had the highest univariable AUC (0.74). For borderline vs stage I malignancy, no proteins were promising. For stage I vs II-IV malignancy, CA125, HE4, CA72.4, CA15.3 and LAP had univariable AUCs ≥0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm the dominant role of CA125 for identifying malignancy, and suggest that other markers (HE4, CA72.4, CA15.3 and LAP) may help to distinguish between stage I and stage II-IV malignancies. However, further research is needed, also to investigate the added value over clinical and ultrasound predictors of malignancy, focusing on the differentiation between subtypes of malignancy.

摘要

目的

评估肿瘤和免疫相关蛋白在鉴别良恶性附件肿块,以及不同肿瘤亚组中的诊断价值。

方法

在这项探索性诊断研究中,连续纳入了 254 名计划手术的附件肿块患者(128 例良性、42 例交界性、22 例 I 期、55 例 II-IV 期和 7 例继发性转移性肿瘤)。使用多重高通量免疫分析(Luminex)和电化学发光免疫分析(ECLIA)术前检测了 33 种血清蛋白的定量。计算了单变量受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下的面积(AUC)。为了区分恶性和良性肿瘤,使用带向后消除的脊线逻辑回归进行了多变量分析,并使用自举法验证了得到的 AUC。

结果

CA125 区分良恶性肿瘤的单变量 AUC 最高(0.85,95%置信区间 0.79-0.89)。将 CA125 与 CA72.4 和 HE4 结合使用可将 AUC 提高至 0.87。对于良性与交界性肿瘤,CA125 的单变量 AUC 最高(0.74)。对于交界性与 I 期恶性肿瘤,没有蛋白有前景。对于 I 期与 II-IV 期恶性肿瘤,CA125、HE4、CA72.4、CA15.3 和 LAP 的单变量 AUC 均≥0.80。

结论

结果证实了 CA125 对识别恶性肿瘤的主导作用,并表明其他标志物(HE4、CA72.4、CA15.3 和 LAP)可能有助于区分 I 期和 II-IV 期恶性肿瘤。然而,还需要进一步研究,也需要研究其在临床和超声恶性肿瘤预测因子方面的附加价值,重点是区分恶性肿瘤的亚型。

相似文献

1
Assessment of protein biomarkers for preoperative differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.评估蛋白生物标志物在术前鉴别卵巢良恶性肿瘤中的作用。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):811-819. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Clinical Usefulness of Cancer Antigen (CA) 125, Human Epididymis 4, and CA72-4 Levels and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm Values for Diagnosing Ovarian Tumors in Korean Patients With and Without Endometriosis.CA125、人附睾蛋白 4 和 CA72-4 水平及卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法值在韩国有和无子宫内膜异位症的卵巢肿瘤患者中的临床应用。
Ann Lab Med. 2020 Jan;40(1):40-47. doi: 10.3343/alm.2020.40.1.40.
3
A multiplex biomarker assay improves the diagnostic performance of HE4 and CA125 in ovarian tumor patients.一种多重生物标志物检测方法提高了 HE4 和 CA125 在卵巢肿瘤患者中的诊断性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 19;15(10):e0240418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240418. eCollection 2020.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of CA125 and HE4 in ovarian carcinoma patients and the effect of confounders on their serum levels.CA125 和 HE4 对卵巢癌患者的诊断准确性及混杂因素对其血清水平的影响。
Curr Probl Cancer. 2019 Oct;43(5):450-460. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
Symptoms, CA125 and HE4 for the preoperative prediction of ovarian malignancy in Brazilian women with ovarian masses.症状、CA125和HE4在巴西卵巢肿块女性患者术前预测卵巢恶性肿瘤中的应用
BMC Cancer. 2013 Sep 18;13:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-423.
6
[Borderline Ovarian Tumours: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Value of Tumor Markers].[卵巢交界性肿瘤:CNGOF临床实践指南 - 肿瘤标志物的价值]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Mar;48(3):277-286. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
7
Clinical Value of Serum HE4, CA125, CA72-4, and ROMA Index for Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer and Prediction of Postoperative Recurrence.血清HE4、CA125、CA72-4及ROMA指数在卵巢癌诊断及术后复发预测中的临床价值
Clin Lab. 2019 Apr 1;65(4). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.181030.
8
Development of a multimarker assay for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic masses.开发一种多标志物检测方法用于鉴别诊断良恶性盆腔包块。
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Feb 2;440:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
9
Tissue CA125 and HE4 Gene Expression Levels Offer Superior Accuracy in Discriminating Benign from Malignant Pelvic Masses.组织CA125和HE4基因表达水平在鉴别盆腔良恶性肿块方面具有更高的准确性。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(1):323-33. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.1.323.
10
Comparison of the predictive performance of risk of malignancy indexes 1-4, HE4 and risk of malignancy algorithm in the triage of adnexal masses.比较风险恶性指数 1-4、HE4 和风险恶性算法在附件包块分诊中的预测性能。
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Apr 25;13(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00643-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Causal inference in the diagnosis and prognosis of ovarian cancer: current state and future directions.卵巢癌诊断与预后中的因果推断:现状与未来方向
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s12094-025-03967-1.
2
Ultrasound-based radiomics for predicting the five major histological subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer.基于超声的影像组学用于预测上皮性卵巢癌的五种主要组织学亚型
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01624-1.
3
Multi-modality deep learning model reaches high prediction accuracy in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
多模态深度学习模型在卵巢癌诊断中达到高预测准确率。
iScience. 2024 Mar 4;27(4):109403. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109403. eCollection 2024 Apr 19.
4
Clinical Significance of the Combination of Serum HE4 Levels, Hemoglobin-to-Red Cell Distribution Width Ratio, and CT Imaging for the Pretreatment Assessment of Adnexal Masses.血清HE4水平、血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值及CT成像联合用于附件包块预处理评估的临床意义
J Cancer. 2023 Feb 27;14(4):600-610. doi: 10.7150/jca.81174. eCollection 2023.
5
Biomarker-Based Models for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Mass: A Multicenter Validation Study.基于生物标志物的附件包块术前评估模型:一项多中心验证研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;14(7):1780. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071780.
6
Serum Autoantibodies against LRDD, STC1, and FOXA1 as Biomarkers in the Detection of Ovarian Cancer.血清自身抗体 LRDD、STC1 和 FOXA1 作为卵巢癌检测的生物标志物。
Dis Markers. 2022 Mar 1;2022:6657820. doi: 10.1155/2022/6657820. eCollection 2022.
7
Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy Reduces, and Surgery Increases Immunosuppression in First-Line Treatment for Ovarian Cancer.新辅助化疗可减轻,而手术会增加卵巢癌一线治疗中的免疫抑制。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 24;13(23):5899. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235899.
8
Peripherally-driven myeloid NFkB and IFN/ISG responses predict malignancy risk, survival, and immunotherapy regime in ovarian cancer.外周驱动的髓系 NFkB 和 IFN/ISG 反应可预测卵巢癌的恶性风险、生存和免疫治疗方案。
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003609.
9
Colon carcinoma presenting as ovarian metastasis.以卵巢转移表现的结肠癌。
Radiol Case Rep. 2021 Jul 23;16(9):2799-2803. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.06.072. eCollection 2021 Sep.