Kurti Marin K, Schroth Kevin R J, Ackerman Christopher, Kennedy Michelle, Jeong Michelle, Delnevo Cristine D
Eastern Connecticut State University, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, Criminology and Social Work, 83 Windham Street Willimantic, CT 06226, USA.
Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, USA.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Sep 18;20:101200. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101200. eCollection 2020 Dec.
This study measures the availability of menthol cigarettes in Oakland, California where such products were banned from the majority of tobacco retailers, except for those who sold a significant amount of tobacco (e.g., 60% gross income). Out of a total of 385 retailers in Oakland, only forty-eight retailers were exempt from this ban at the time of data collection. In February 2019, seven months after the ban went into effect, we selected a stratified random sample of 15 census tracts, based on race/ethnicity. In pairs, data collectors walked on opposite sides of the street and collected all discarded cigarette packs (n = 641) from the streets and sidewalks on weekdays. Overall, we found almost half (46.0%; 95% CI = 32.6%-59.3%) of the packs collected were menthol, with Newport as the dominant brand. We found at least one pack of menthol cigarettes in 14 of the 15 sampled census tracts. In predominantly black/African American census tracts, the proportion of menthol cigarettes collected was significantly higher (70.1%; 95% CI = 62.6%-77.7%) when compared to mixed race/ethnicity (55.9%; 95% CI = 41.0-70.9%) and white tracts (35.1%; 95% CI = 13.2%-57.1%). Finally, there was a moderate and negative correlation between distance to exempt tobacco retailer and menthol availability (r = -0.66, p < .05). The proportion of menthol cigarette packs decreased the further away census tracts were from exempt tobacco retailers. Results from this study lend support that partial bans provide disproportionate availability of menthol cigarettes in black/African American census tracts. Complete bans may help eliminate disparities associated with menthol cigarette use across communities.
本研究衡量了加利福尼亚州奥克兰市薄荷醇香烟的可得性。在该市,除了那些销售大量烟草(例如,占总收入60%)的零售商外,大多数烟草零售商被禁止销售此类产品。在奥克兰总共385家零售商中,在数据收集时只有48家零售商免受此禁令限制。2019年2月,禁令生效七个月后,我们根据种族/族裔,从15个人口普查区中选取了一个分层随机样本。数据收集人员两人一组,在街道两侧行走,在工作日从街道和人行道上收集所有丢弃的烟盒(n = 641)。总体而言,我们发现收集到的烟盒中近一半(46.0%;95%置信区间 = 32.6% - 59.3%)是薄荷醇香烟,其中纽波特是主导品牌。在15个抽样人口普查区中的14个区,我们至少发现了一包薄荷醇香烟。在以黑人/非裔美国人为主的人口普查区,收集到的薄荷醇香烟比例(70.1%;95%置信区间 = 62.6% - 77.7%)显著高于混合种族/族裔区(55.9%;95%置信区间 = 41.0 - 70.9%)和白人区(35.1%;95%置信区间 = 13.2% - 57.1%)。最后,到豁免烟草零售商的距离与薄荷醇香烟可得性之间存在中度负相关(r = -0.66,p <.05)。人口普查区离豁免烟草零售商越远,薄荷醇香烟盒的比例越低。本研究结果支持这样的观点,即部分禁令导致薄荷醇香烟在黑人/非裔美国人人口普查区的可得性不成比例。全面禁令可能有助于消除不同社区间与薄荷醇香烟使用相关的差异。