Lhermitte F, Marteau R, de Saxcé H
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1987;143(2):98-107.
45 patients were treated by combined application of antilymphocyte serum, azathioprine and prednisone: a control group of such 22 patients was besides treated by azathioprine and prednisone only. The treatment by antilymphocyte serum included a four weeks initial treatment, and one year continuous treatment one infusion per week. Azathioprine and prednisone were given every day during the same time. Azathioprine only was given during the three following year. The two groups were followed up during four years. This treatment was well accepted by patients under strict technical survey conditions. Serum sickness was noted in 11 p. cent of the cases. The equine antiglobulin antibody titre, increased during the initial treatment, was connected with serum sickness or, when the treatment was continued, with the inefficacy of the treatment. Rosettes titre decreased in ten cases, no clinical correlation was possible. The complement, immune complexes, were normal before treatment with most of the observed patients. The delayed hypersensitivity skin tests were negative after a month in 80 p. cent of the cases. The cerebrospinal fluid analysis, for the elements as well as for the rate of proteins and gammaglobulins, showed no significant variations before and after the treatment. The comparison with the control group showed a significant statistical difference as too the number of aggravated and improved patients after the first year. When grouping together stable and improved patients, the difference was statistically significant after the third year. The difference was not significant in years "two" or four. No difference in the frequency of the relapses could be noted, in the first year or the following three years. In spite of inconsistent results comparison showed favorable data after three years. The good results seemed due to the additional use of antilymphocyte serum. Such a treatment associating antilymphocyte serum to azathioprine and prednisone is beneficial in evolutive, remittent and recent multiple sclerosis. Through the length of the treatment remains difficult to determine, we conclude that it is really beneficial for such patients.
45例患者采用抗淋巴细胞血清、硫唑嘌呤和泼尼松联合应用进行治疗:另外22例患者作为对照组,仅采用硫唑嘌呤和泼尼松治疗。抗淋巴细胞血清治疗包括为期四周的初始治疗以及为期一年的持续治疗,每周输注一次。在同一时期内,硫唑嘌呤和泼尼松每日给药。在随后的三年中仅给予硫唑嘌呤。两组患者随访四年。在严格的技术监测条件下,该治疗方法为患者所良好接受。11%的病例出现血清病。初始治疗期间马抗球蛋白抗体滴度升高,这与血清病相关,或者在持续治疗时与治疗无效相关。10例患者的玫瑰花结滴度下降,无法建立临床相关性。大多数观察患者在治疗前补体、免疫复合物正常。80%的病例在一个月后迟发型超敏皮肤试验呈阴性。脑脊液分析,无论是成分还是蛋白质和γ球蛋白的比例,在治疗前后均无显著变化。与对照组相比,第一年病情加重和改善的患者数量也存在显著统计学差异。将病情稳定和改善的患者归为一组时,第三年后差异具有统计学意义。在第二年和第四年差异不显著。在第一年或随后三年中,复发频率没有差异。尽管结果不一致,但三年后的比较显示出有利的数据。良好的结果似乎归因于抗淋巴细胞血清的额外使用。这种将抗淋巴细胞血清与硫唑嘌呤和泼尼松联合应用的治疗方法,对于进展性、缓解性和近期发病的多发性硬化症是有益的。尽管治疗时长仍难以确定,但我们得出结论,这对这类患者确实有益。