• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剂量递增对中度至重度类风湿关节炎患者使用依那西普和阿达木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤的成本效益的影响。

The Effect of Dose Escalation on the Cost-Effectiveness of Etanercept and Adalimumab with Methotrexate Among Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

作者信息

Incerti Devin, Hernandez Ervant J Maksabedian, Tkacz Joseph, Jansen Jeroen P, Collier David, Gharaibeh Mahdi, Moore-Schiltz Laura, Stolshek Bradley S

机构信息

Precision Health Economics, Oakland, California.

Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1236-1242. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1236.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1236
PMID:32996384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10391279/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) occasionally increase their doses of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, especially the monoclonal antibody origin drugs such as adalimumab and infliximab, after inadequate response to the initial dose. Previous studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of various sequences of treatment for RA in the United States but have not considered the effect of dose escalation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of etanercept and adalimumab by incorporating the effect of dose escalation in moderate to severe RA patients.

METHODS

We adapted the open-source Innovation and Value Initiative - Rheumatoid Arthritis model, version 1.0 to separately simulate the magnitude and time to dose escalation among RA patients taking adalimumab plus methotrexate or etanercept plus methotrexate from a societal perspective and lifetime horizon. An important assumption in the model was that dose escalation would increase treatment costs through its effect on the number of doses but would have no effect on effectiveness. We estimated the dose escalation parameters using the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. We fit competing parametric survival models to model time to dose escalation and used model diagnostics to compare the fit of the competing models. We measured the magnitude of dose escalation as the percentage increase in the number of doses conditional on dose escalation. Finally, we used the parameterized model to simulate treatment sequences beginning with a TNF inhibitor (adalimumab, etanercept) followed by nonbiologic treatment.

RESULTS

In baseline models without dose escalation, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year of the etanercept treatment sequence relative to the adalimumab treatment sequence was $85,593. Incorporating dose escalation increased treatment costs for each sequence, but costs increased more with adalimumab, lowering the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to $9,001. At willingness-to-pay levels of $100,000, the etanercept sequence was more cost-effective compared with the adalimumab sequence, with probability 0.55 and 0.85 in models with and without dose escalation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation has important effects on cost-effectiveness and should be considered when comparing biologic medications for the treatment of RA.

DISCLOSURES

Funding for this study was contributed by Amgen. When this work was conducted, Incerti and Jansen were employees of Precision Health Economics, which received financial support from Amgen. Maksabedian Hernandez, Collier, Gharaibeh, and Stolshek were employees and stockholders of Amgen, and Tkacz and Moore-Schiltz were employees of IBM Watson Health, which received financial support from Amgen. Some of the results of this work were previously presented as a poster at the 2019 AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting, March 25-28, 2019, in San Diego, CA.

摘要

背景

中重度类风湿关节炎(RA)患者在初始剂量治疗反应不足后,偶尔会增加肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂的剂量,尤其是阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗等单克隆抗体类药物。此前的研究评估了美国RA各种治疗方案的成本效益,但未考虑剂量增加的影响。

目的

通过纳入中重度RA患者剂量增加的影响,评估依那西普和阿达木单抗的成本效益。

方法

我们采用开源的创新与价值倡议 - 类风湿关节炎模型1.0版,从社会角度和终身视角分别模拟接受阿达木单抗加甲氨蝶呤或依那西普加甲氨蝶呤治疗的RA患者剂量增加的幅度和时间。该模型的一个重要假设是,剂量增加会因其对剂量数量的影响而增加治疗成本,但对疗效无影响。我们使用IBM MarketScan商业和医疗保险补充数据库估计剂量增加参数。我们拟合竞争参数生存模型以模拟剂量增加的时间,并使用模型诊断比较竞争模型的拟合情况。我们将剂量增加的幅度衡量为剂量增加条件下剂量数量的百分比增长。最后,我们使用参数化模型模拟以TNF抑制剂(阿达木单抗、依那西普)开始随后进行非生物治疗的治疗方案。

结果

在无剂量增加的基线模型中,依那西普治疗方案相对于阿达木单抗治疗方案每质量调整生命年的增量成本为85,593美元。纳入剂量增加会使每个方案的治疗成本增加,但阿达木单抗方案成本增加更多,将增量成本效益比降至9,001美元。在支付意愿水平为100,000美元时,依那西普方案与阿达木单抗方案相比更具成本效益,在有和无剂量增加的模型中,概率分别为0.55和0.85。

结论

剂量增加对成本效益有重要影响,在比较治疗RA的生物药物时应予以考虑。

披露

本研究的资金由安进公司提供。开展这项工作时,因塞尔蒂和扬森是Precision Health Economics公司的员工,该公司接受了安进公司的财政支持。马克萨贝迪安·埃尔南德斯、科利尔、加拉伊贝和斯托尔舍克是安进公司的员工和股东,而特卡茨和摩尔 - 席尔茨是IBM Watson Health公司的员工,该公司接受了安进公司的财政支持。这项工作的一些结果曾在2019年3月25 - 28日于加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥举行的2019年美国医学成本管理协会(AMCP)管理式医疗与专科药房年会上以海报形式展示。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Dose Escalation on the Cost-Effectiveness of Etanercept and Adalimumab with Methotrexate Among Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.剂量递增对中度至重度类风湿关节炎患者使用依那西普和阿达木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤的成本效益的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1236-1242. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1236.
2
Treatment Patterns and Costs in Biologic DMARD-Naive Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating Etanercept or Adalimumab with or Without Methotrexate.生物制剂初治类风湿关节炎患者接受依那西普或阿达木单抗联合或不联合甲氨蝶呤治疗的模式和费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Mar;26(3):285-294. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.3.285.
3
Effectiveness and Costs Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Targeted Immunomodulators Using Real-World U.S. Data.类风湿关节炎患者采用真实世界美国数据靶向免疫调节剂治疗的效果和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Aug;26(8):1039-1049. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.8.1039.
4
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗成人类风湿关节炎有效性的系统评价及其成本效益的经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420.
5
Cost-utility analysis of certolizumab pegol in combination with methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis in Greece.在希腊,对中重度活动期类风湿关节炎患者,采用培塞利珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤进行成本-效用分析。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Sep;37(9):1441-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3736-z. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tofacitinib compared with adalimumab and etanercept in the treatment of severe active rheumatoid arthritis; Iranian experience.托法替布对比阿达木单抗和依那西普治疗重度活动期类风湿关节炎的成本效果分析;伊朗经验。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Aug;21(4):775-784. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1834384. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
7
Cost effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors as first-line agents in rheumatoid arthritis.肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂作为类风湿关节炎一线用药的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(12):1221-32. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624120-00006.
8
Assessing the Association of Formulary Copayment Changes with Real-World Treatment Patterns in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis on Etanercept.评估依那西普治疗类风湿关节炎患者的处方共付额变化与真实世界治疗模式的相关性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):211-220. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19231. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
9
Effectiveness and healthcare costs among stabilised rheumatoid arthritis patients with dose reduction of adalimumab or etanercept in real world.在现实世界中,阿达木单抗或依那西普剂量降低的病情稳定的类风湿性关节炎患者的疗效和医疗费用
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35(5):791-798. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
10
Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept, and tocilizumab as first-line treatments for moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.阿达木单抗、依那西普和托珠单抗作为中重度类风湿关节炎一线治疗药物的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(2):340-51. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.649327. Epub 2012 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Four Aspects Affecting Health Economic Decision Models and Their Validation.影响健康经济决策模型及其验证的四个方面。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Mar;40(3):241-248. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01110-w. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Biopharmaceuticals for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis: Infliximab, Adalimumab, and Etanercept.治疗类风湿关节炎的生物制药的成本效益分析:英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗和依那西普。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Nov 28;2021:4450162. doi: 10.1155/2021/4450162. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A Flexible Open-Source Decision Model for Value Assessment of Biologic Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis.用于评估生物治疗类风湿关节炎价值的灵活开源决策模型。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jun;37(6):829-843. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-00765-2.
2
Assessing the Value of Sarilumab Monotherapy for Adults with Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.评估赛来昔布单抗单药治疗中重度活跃类风湿关节炎成人患者的价值:成本效果分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):80-87. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.080.
3
Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in a National, Privately Insured Population: Utilization, Expenditures, and Price Trends.全国私人保险人群中生物性改善病情抗风湿药的使用情况、支出及价格趋势
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Feb;10(1):27-36.
4
Cost-effectiveness of sequenced treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with targeted immune modulators.使用靶向免疫调节剂对类风湿关节炎进行序贯治疗的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2017 Jul;20(7):703-714. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1307205. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
5
The Cost-effectiveness of Sequences of Biological Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug Treatment in England for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Can Tolerate Methotrexate.英格兰针对能够耐受甲氨蝶呤的类风湿关节炎患者的生物改善病情抗风湿药物治疗序列的成本效益
J Rheumatol. 2017 Jul;44(7):973-980. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160941. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
6
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and after the failure of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs only: systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、托珠单抗和阿巴西普用于治疗既往未使用改善病情抗风湿药物治疗且仅在传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610. doi: 10.3310/hta20350.
7
Anti-TNF-α therapies for the treatment of Crohn's disease: the past, present and future.用于治疗克罗恩病的抗TNF-α疗法:过去、现在与未来。
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2016;25(2):129-43. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2016.1126247. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
8
2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.2015 年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26. doi: 10.1002/art.39480. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
9
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of combination therapy for early, rapidly progressing rheumatoid arthritis by simulating the reversible and irreversible effects of the disease.通过模拟疾病的可逆和不可逆效应,对早期快速进展型类风湿关节炎联合治疗的成本效益进行建模。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 9;5(6):e006560. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006560.
10
Burden of dose escalation with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of frequency and costs.类风湿关节炎中肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂剂量递增的负担:频率和成本的系统评价
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Sep-Oct;33(5):737-45. Epub 2015 Jun 8.