• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会参与科学:西班牙民间社会组织的观点。

Social participation in science: Perspectives of Spanish civil society organizations.

机构信息

Pompeu Fabra University, Spain.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2021 Jan;30(1):36-54. doi: 10.1177/0963662520960663. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1177/0963662520960663
PMID:32996413
Abstract

There is a general trend toward more active, broader, and more inclusive participation of different stakeholders in science. Civil society organizations' inclusion in the scientific process is being promoted. However, there are few attempts to understand the role of civil society organizations in research. This study is based on the analysis of 31 semi-structured interviews with Spanish civil society organization managers and representatives. Our main results regarding the current relationship between civil society organizations and the research system are (a) civil society organizations mainly participate in science within one single research moment and they are unaware of their potential. (b) We identify a lack of resources, mutual knowledge (among civil society organizations and academia), and capabilities as barriers for civil society organizations' participation.

摘要

目前,不同利益攸关方更加积极、广泛和包容地参与科学研究已成为一种趋势。民间社会组织被纳入到科学进程中。然而,很少有人试图了解民间社会组织在研究中的作用。本研究基于对 31 名西班牙民间社会组织管理者和代表的半结构化访谈的分析。关于民间社会组织与研究系统之间目前的关系,我们的主要研究结果是:(a)民间社会组织主要参与单一的研究环节,且对其潜力缺乏认识。(b)我们发现资源匮乏、民间社会组织与学术界之间缺乏相互了解以及能力不足是民间社会组织参与的障碍。

相似文献

1
Social participation in science: Perspectives of Spanish civil society organizations.社会参与科学:西班牙民间社会组织的观点。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Jan;30(1):36-54. doi: 10.1177/0963662520960663. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Civil society engagement in multi-stakeholder dialogue: a qualitative study exploring the opinions and perceptions of MeTA members.公民社会参与多方利益相关者对话:一项探索疟疾消除监测联盟(MeTA)成员意见和看法的定性研究
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Jan 6;10:5. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0096-0. eCollection 2017.
3
Civil society participation in global public private partnerships for health.民间社会参与全球公私伙伴关系促进卫生健康。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Oct 1;33(8):928-936. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy070.
4
Factoring civil society actors into health policy processes in low- and middle-income countries: a review of research articles, 2007-16.将民间社会行为体纳入中低收入国家卫生政策制定过程:对 2007-2016 年研究文章的综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Feb 1;34(1):67-77. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy109.
5
Civil society participation in the health system: the case of Brazil's Health Councils.民间社会对卫生系统的参与:以巴西卫生委员会为例。
Global Health. 2016 Oct 26;12(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0197-1.
6
[The participation of civil society in health and social policy councils in the city of Piraí, State of Rio de Janeiro (2006)].[公民社会参与里约热内卢州皮拉伊市卫生与社会政策委员会(2006年)]
Cien Saude Colet. 2013 Jul;18(7):2059-68. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232013000700021.
7
Toward the development of a vibrant, super-aged society: The future of medicine and society in Japan.迈向充满活力的超老龄社会:日本的医学与社会的未来。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Aug;21(8):601-613. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14201. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
8
Identifying the non-governmental organizations' activities and challenges in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran.识别伊朗非政府组织应对 COVID-19 大流行的活动和挑战。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 10;22(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13080-5.
9
From invited to uninvited participation (and back?): rethinking civil society engagement in technology assessment and development.从受邀参与到主动参与(以及回归受邀参与?):重新思考公民社会在技术评估与发展中的参与
Poiesis Prax. 2012 Nov;9(1-2):43-60. doi: 10.1007/s10202-012-0125-2. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
10
Civil society advocacy in Nigeria: promoting democratic norms or donor demands?尼日利亚的民间社会倡导:是在促进民主规范还是遵循捐助者的要求?
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jul 11;16(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0093-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Collective forward-looking responsibility of patient advocacy organizations: conceptual and ethical analysis.患者倡导组织的集体前瞻性责任:概念和伦理分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Aug 23;22(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00680-w.