Athletic Training Department, Daemen College, Amherst, NY, USA.
Physical Therapy Department, Daemen College, Amherst, NY, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Apr;29(2):83-91. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1813471. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
The objective of this paper was to determine the extent to which dry needling is instructed in entry-level education programs for physical therapists. Program directors from 226 entry-level education programs recognized by the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education were recruited via e-mail to participate in an anonymous 35-item electronic survey during the 2017-2018 academic year. The survey evaluated dry needling curricula, faculty qualifications, attitudes and experience, and programs' future plans for teaching dry needling. A total of 75 programs responded to the survey (response rate = 33.1%). Forty (53.3%) had integrated dry needling theory and psychomotor training into their programs and 8 (10.6%) planned to include such content in their curriculum in the future. Of the 40 respondents, 28 indicated that dry needling education was integrated into a required course, 4 indicated that dry needling was an elective course, and 8 did not specify how dry needling education was integrated. Faculty teaching dry needling appear to be well qualified, with the majority having 5-10 years of experience using dry needling in clinical practice. The primary reason for programs not teaching dry needling is that it was not considered an entry-level skill. There appeared to be variability in how dry needling was integrated into the curricula, as well as in the depth and breadth of instruction. Our research may serve as a baseline for faculty to assess existing dry needling curricula and as a guide for developing curricula in new or existing physical therapy programs.
本文旨在确定物理治疗师入门教育计划中干针治疗教学的程度。通过电子邮件招募了 226 个由物理治疗教育认证委员会认可的入门教育计划的主任参与一项匿名的 35 项电子调查,该调查于 2017-2018 学年进行。该调查评估了干针治疗课程、教师资质、态度和经验,以及各计划未来教授干针治疗的计划。共有 75 个计划对调查做出了回应(回应率=33.1%)。40 个(53.3%)计划将干针治疗理论和运动技能培训纳入其课程,8 个(10.6%)计划在未来的课程中纳入此类内容。在 40 名回答者中,28 名表示干针治疗教育已纳入必修课程,4 名表示干针治疗是选修课程,8 名则未具体说明干针治疗教育是如何纳入的。教授干针治疗的教师似乎具备良好的资质,他们中的大多数人在临床实践中使用干针治疗的经验在 5-10 年之间。各计划不教授干针治疗的主要原因是其未被视为入门技能。干针治疗在课程中的融入方式、教学的深度和广度似乎存在差异。我们的研究可能为教师评估现有干针治疗课程提供基础,并为新的或现有的物理治疗计划开发课程提供指导。