University of Amsterdam; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Amsterdam - Netherlands
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 2020 Sep;27(suppl 1):253-262. doi: 10.1590/S0104-59702020000300013.
In the last five years there has been a resurgence of scholarly research and museum exhibitions on the history of HIV and AIDS. This work has called into question some of the conventions of archiving and interpreting the history of the pandemic. It is increasingly clear that a narrow range of materials have been saved. As historians and curators turn to these holdings for analysis and exhibition, they find they inadequately represent the impact of AIDS across diverse groups as well as the range of local, national, international responses. This essay considers some of the factors that shape collection of the material culture, particularly the heritage of public health, and the consequences for our understanding of lessons from the past.
在过去的五年中,有关艾滋病毒和艾滋病历史的学术研究和博物馆展览再次兴起。这些工作对一些存档和解释大流行病历史的传统提出了质疑。越来越明显的是,保存的材料范围很窄。随着历史学家和策展人开始对这些藏品进行分析和展览,他们发现这些藏品不能充分代表艾滋病在不同群体中的影响,也不能充分代表地方、国家和国际反应的范围。本文探讨了影响物质文化收藏的一些因素,特别是公共卫生遗产,以及对我们理解过去教训的影响。