Werdan K, Boeken U, Briegel M J, Buerke M, Geppert A, Janssens U, Kelm M, Michels G, Pilarczyk K, Schlitt A, Thiele H, Willems S, Zeymer U, Zwißler B, Delle-Karth G, Ferrari M, Figulla H, Heller A, Hindricks G, Pichler-Cetin E, Pieske B M, Prondzinsky R, Thielmann M, Bauersachs J, Kopp I, Ruß M
Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06097, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie - Herz- und Kreislaufforschung (DGK), Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Anaesthesist. 2021 Jan;70(1):42-70. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00868-6.
The present guidelines ( http://leitlinien.net ) focus exclusively on cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction (infarction-related cardiogenic shock, ICS). The cardiological/cardiac surgical and the intensive care medicine strategies dealt with in these guidelines are essential to the successful treatment and survival of patients with ICS; however, both European and American guidelines on myocardial infarction and heart failure and also position papers on cardiogenic shock focused mainly on cardiological aspects.
Evidence on the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of ICS was collected and recommendations compiled in a nominal group process by delegates of the German Cardiac Society (DGK), the German Society for Medical Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN), the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (DGTHG), the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), the Austrian Society for Internal and General Intensive Care Medicine (ÖGIAIM), the Austrian Cardiology Society (ÖKG), the German Society for Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiovascular Diseases (DGPR) and the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI), under the auspices of the Working Group of the Association of Medical Scientific Societies in Germany (AWMF). If only poor evidence on ICS was available, general study results on intensive care patients were inspected and presented in order to enable analogue conclusions.
A total of 95 recommendations, including 2 statements were compiled and based on these 7 algorithms with defined instructions on the course of treatment.
德国心脏病学会(DGK)、德国医学重症医学与急诊医学学会(DGIIN)、德国胸心血管外科学会(DGTHG)、德国麻醉学与重症医学学会(DGAI)、奥地利内科与综合重症医学学会(ÖGIAIM)、奥地利心脏病学会(ÖKG)、德国心血管疾病预防与康复学会(DGPR)以及德国重症与急诊医学跨学科协会(DIVI)的代表在德国医学科学协会联盟(AWMF)工作组的支持下,通过名义小组程序收集了关于ICS诊断、监测和治疗的证据并汇编了建议。若仅有关于ICS的证据不足,则检查并呈现重症监护患者的一般研究结果以便得出类似结论。
共汇编了95条建议,包括2条声明,并基于这些建议制定了7种具有明确治疗流程说明的算法。