Sassover Eli, Weinstein Aviv
1Department of Behavioral Science, Ariel University, Science Park, Ariel, Israel.
2Department of Behavioral Science and Integrative Brain and Cognition Center, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
J Behav Addict. 2020 Sep 29;11(2):166-79. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00055.
Compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) has been a long debated issue. While formerly the discussion was about whether to regard CSBD as a distinctive disorder, the current debate is dealing with the classification of this phenomenon. One of the prominent voices in this field considers CSBD as a behavioral addiction and proposes CSBD to be called and diagnosed as sexual addiction (SA). This present debate paper will review the existing evidence supporting this view and it will argue against it.
We have found that a great deal of the current literature is anecdotal while empirical evidence is insufficient. First, the reports about the prevalence of CSBD are contradictory. Additionally, the field mainly suffers from inconsistent defining criteria of CSBD and a consensus which symptoms should be included. As a result, the empirical evidence that does exist is mostly about some symptoms individually and not on the disorder as a whole construct.
We conclude that currently, there is not enough data supporting CSBD as a behavioral addiction. Further research has to be done, examining CSBD phenomenology as a whole construct and based on a homogeneous criterion.
强迫性行为障碍(CSBD)一直是一个长期存在争议的问题。以前的讨论是关于是否将CSBD视为一种独特的障碍,而当前的争论则围绕这一现象的分类。该领域一个突出的观点认为CSBD是一种行为成瘾,并提议将CSBD称为性成瘾(SA)并进行诊断。本辩论文章将回顾支持这一观点的现有证据,并对其进行反驳。
我们发现,当前大量文献是轶事性的,而实证证据不足。首先,关于CSBD患病率的报告相互矛盾。此外,该领域主要存在CSBD定义标准不一致以及对于应纳入哪些症状缺乏共识的问题。因此,现有的实证证据大多是关于个别症状,而非关于整个障碍的构建。
我们得出结论,目前没有足够的数据支持将CSBD视为一种行为成瘾。必须进行进一步的研究,以整体构建的方式并基于统一的标准来审视CSBD的现象学。