Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性多中心外部验证研究,对改良后的利物浦扁桃体周脓肿评分(LPS)进行无检查 COVID-19 修正。

A prospective multicentre external validation study of the Liverpool Peritonsillar abscess Score (LPS) with a no-examination COVID-19 modification.

机构信息

Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.

Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan;46(1):229-233. doi: 10.1111/coa.13652. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our primary aim was to validate the Liverpool Peritonsillar abscess Score (LPS) externally in a new patient cohort. Our secondary aim was to modify the LPS in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic to produce a no-examination variant for use in this instance.

DESIGN

Prospective multicentre external validation study.

SETTING

Six different secondary care institutions across the United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients over 16 years old who were referred to ENT with any uncomplicated sore throat such a tonsillitis or peritonsillar abscess (PTA).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for both the original LPS model and the modified model for COVID-19.

RESULTS

The LPS model had sensitivity and specificity calculated at 98% and 79%, respectively. The LPS has a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was slightly lower at 63%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, including the area under the curve (AUROC), was 0.888 which indicates very good accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

External validation of the LPS against an independent geographically diverse population yields high NPV. This may support non-specialist colleagues who may have concerns about mis-diagnosing a PTA. The COVID-19 modification of the LPS has a similar NPV, which may be of use where routine oral examination is to be avoided during the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

目的

我们的主要目的是在新的患者队列中对外验证利物浦扁桃体周脓肿评分(LPS)。我们的次要目的是根据 COVID-19 大流行修改 LPS,以产生一种无需检查的变体,用于这种情况。

设计

前瞻性多中心外部验证研究。

设置

英国六个不同的二级保健机构。

参与者

年龄在 16 岁以上,因任何单纯性咽痛(如扁桃体炎或扁桃体周脓肿)而被耳鼻喉科转介的患者。

主要结果测量

原始 LPS 模型和针对 COVID-19 的改良模型的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。

结果

LPS 模型的敏感性和特异性分别计算为 98%和 79%。LPS 具有高阴性预测值(NPV),为 99%。阳性预测值(PPV)略低,为 63%。包括曲线下面积(AUROC)在内的接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线为 0.888,表明准确性非常高。

结论

LPS 针对独立的地理多样化人群进行外部验证,具有较高的 NPV。这可能支持非专家同事,他们可能担心误诊扁桃体周脓肿。LPS 的 COVID-19 改良版本具有相似的 NPV,这可能在 COVID-19 大流行期间需要避免常规口腔检查时有用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验