O'Reilly Eileen M, Cockrum Paul, Surinach Andy, Wu Zheng, Dillon Allison, Yu Kenneth H
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Ipsen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(22):8480-8490. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3477. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Real-world practice patterns, treatment sequencing, and outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer remain unclear. Previous research indicates that the likelihood of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving or continuing cancer-directed therapy is low-a phenomenon called nihilism. This retrospective, descriptive analysis examined clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).
Treatment patterns were examined using electronic health records from the Flatiron Health database covering the period from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019. Real-world overall survival [rwOS]) was compared for a subgroup of patients receiving treatment and a matched subgroup not receiving treatment.
Of 7666 patients, 5687 (74.2%) received at least one line of systemic therapy. A greater proportion of patients receiving treatment than not receiving treatment had an initial diagnosis of stage IV disease (68.8% vs 61.2%, respectively). Among patients receiving an initial therapy, fewer than half (38.2%; 2174/5687) received second-line treatment, mostly because they died, and only 34.3% (745/2174) of those receiving second-line treatment advanced to third-line treatment. The rwOS for patients receiving at least one line of systemic therapy was 8.1 months versus 2.6 months for matched patients not receiving treatment (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.45; 1470 patients per group).
Systemic therapy provided significant clinical benefit for patients who were eligible and chose to receive it, particularly when treatment was consistent with guideline recommendations. The large proportion of patients initiating treatment suggests that nihilism with mPDAC is diminishing.
转移性胰腺癌患者的实际临床实践模式、治疗顺序及治疗结果仍不明确。既往研究表明,转移性胰腺癌患者接受或继续接受癌症针对性治疗的可能性较低,这一现象被称为“虚无主义”。本项回顾性描述性分析研究了转移性胰腺导管腺癌(mPDAC)患者的临床特征、治疗模式及治疗结果。
利用Flatiron Health数据库2014年1月1日至2019年6月30日期间的电子健康记录来研究治疗模式。对接受治疗的患者亚组和未接受治疗的匹配亚组的真实世界总生存期(rwOS)进行比较。
在7666例患者中,5687例(74.2%)接受了至少一线全身治疗。接受治疗的患者中初始诊断为IV期疾病的比例高于未接受治疗的患者(分别为68.8%和61.2%)。在接受初始治疗的患者中,不到一半(38.2%;2174/5687)接受了二线治疗,主要原因是死亡,而接受二线治疗的患者中只有34.3%(745/2174)进入三线治疗。接受至少一线全身治疗的患者的rwOS为8.1个月,而匹配的未接受治疗的患者为2.6个月(风险比,0.41;95%置信区间,0.38 - 0.45;每组1470例患者)。
全身治疗为符合条件且选择接受治疗的患者带来了显著的临床获益,尤其是当治疗符合指南推荐时。开始治疗的患者比例较高表明mPDAC的虚无主义正在减弱。