From Harvard Medical School (I.G., M.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (I.G.), and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (M.B.R.), Boston, athenahealth, Watertown (B.S.), and Health Data Analytics Institute, Dedham (J.G.) - all in Massachusetts; and the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (H.N.).
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 1;383(14):1349-1357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2013804.
The gender gap in physician pay is often attributed in part to women working fewer hours than men, but evidence to date is limited by self-report and a lack of detail regarding clinical revenue and gender differences in practice style.
Using national all-payer claims and data from electronic health records, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 24.4 million primary care office visits in 2017 and performed comparisons between female and male physicians in the same practices. Our primary independent variable was physician gender; outcomes included visit revenue, visit counts, days worked, and observed visit time (interval between the initiation and the termination of a visit). We created multivariable regression models at the year, day, and visit level after adjustment for characteristics of the primary care physicians (PCPs), patients, and types of visit and for practice fixed effects.
In 2017, female PCPs generated 10.9% less revenue from office visits than their male counterparts (-$39,143.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], -53,523.0 to -24,763.4) and conducted 10.8% fewer visits (-330.5 visits; 95% CI, -406.6 to -254.3) over 2.6% fewer clinical days (-5.3 days; 95% CI, -7.7 to -3.0), after adjustment for age, academic degree, specialty, and number of sessions worked per week, yet spent 2.6% more observed time in visits that year than their male counterparts (1201.3 minutes; 95% CI, 184.7 to 2218.0). Per visit, after adjustment for PCP, patient, and visit characteristics, female PCPs generated equal revenue but spent 15.7% more time with a patient (2.4 minutes; 95% CI, 2.1 to 2.6). These results were consistent in subgroup analyses according to the gender and health status of the patients and the type and complexity of the visits.
Female PCPs generated less visit revenue than male colleagues in the same practices owing to a lower volume of visits, yet spent more time in direct patient care per visit, per day, and per year. (Funded in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.).
医生薪酬的性别差距部分归因于女性工作时间少于男性,但迄今为止的证据受到自我报告的限制,并且缺乏关于临床收入和实践风格中性别差异的详细信息。
我们使用全国所有支付者的索赔数据和电子健康记录中的数据,对 2017 年 2440 万次初级保健门诊就诊进行了横断面分析,并在同一实践中比较了女性和男性医生。我们的主要自变量是医生的性别;结果包括就诊收入、就诊次数、工作天数和观察就诊时间(就诊开始和结束之间的间隔)。在调整了初级保健医生(PCP)、患者以及就诊类型的特征以及实践固定效应后,我们在年度、天和就诊层面创建了多变量回归模型。
2017 年,女性 PCP 的门诊收入比男性同事少 10.9%(-39143.2 美元;95%置信区间[CI],-53523.0 至-24763.4),就诊次数少 10.8%(-330.5 次;95%CI,-406.6 至-254.3),临床工作天数少 2.6%(-5.3 天;95%CI,-7.7 至-3.0),调整年龄、学历、专业以及每周工作次数后,当年观察就诊时间比男性同事多 2.6%(1201.3 分钟;95%CI,184.7 至 2218.0)。每次就诊调整医生、患者和就诊特征后,女性 PCP 的收入相同,但每位患者就诊时间多 15.7%(2.4 分钟;95%CI,2.1 至 2.6)。根据患者的性别和健康状况以及就诊的类型和复杂性进行亚组分析,结果一致。
同一实践中的女性 PCP 就诊收入低于男性同事,原因是就诊次数较少,但每次就诊、每天和每年的直接患者护理时间都更长。(部分由罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会资助)。