• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在伴有髋臼骨缺损的人工关节感染患者中使用载抗生素骨水泥间隔器。

The use of augmented antibiotic-loaded cement spacer in periprosthetic joint infection patients with acetabular bone defect.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, The 985 Hospital of PLA, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 1;15(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01831-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-020-01831-2
PMID:32998728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7528588/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spacer complications may affect final clinical outcome of the two-stage approach in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients. This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes and complications of augmented antibiotic-loaded cement spacer in PJI patients with acetabular bone defect.

METHODS

Data on PJI patients with acetabular bone defect receiving two-stage revision from January 2009 to December 2016, in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Screw-cement-shell was used to improve the stability of the hip with acetabular wall defect. Handmade acetabular spacer could prevent femoral spacer entering into pelvis in patients with acetabular internal wall defect. A total of 26 patients (11 males and 15 females) were included in the current study. Their mean age was 46.7 ± 15.4 years old. Clinical outcomes and complications were measured.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of total 26 hips (21/26, 80.8%) showed positive cultures and 15/26 (57.7%) samples were cultured with staphylococcus. Of enrolled patients, 5/26 (19.2%) developed mixed infection. There was one patient (3.8%) with spacer dislocation and two (7.7%) with spacer fracture. One patient developed acute PJI 5 years after the second-stage revision, so overall success rate among these patients was 96.2%. Differences in Paprosky classifications before the first and second stage did not reach significant level (p > 0.05). Hip Harris score was raised from 40.9 ± 14.0 to 81.2 ± 11.2 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Augmented antibiotic-loaded cement spacer could achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes in PJI patients with acetabular bone defect. It provided joint mobility, increased additional joint stability, and decreased iatrogenic bone defect caused by acetabular wear.

摘要

背景

间隔器并发症可能会影响二期翻修治疗人工关节周围感染(PJI)患者的最终临床结果。本研究旨在探讨强化抗生素骨水泥间隔器在髋臼骨缺损 PJI 患者中的应用效果及并发症。

方法

回顾性分析我院 2009 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月收治的髋臼骨缺损行二期翻修的 PJI 患者的临床资料。采用螺钉-骨水泥-壳技术提高髋臼壁缺损髋关节的稳定性,对于髋臼内板缺损的患者,采用手工制作的髋臼间隔器可防止股骨间隔器进入骨盆。共纳入 26 例患者(男 11 例,女 15 例),平均年龄 46.7±15.4 岁。测量临床结果和并发症。

结果

26 髋中 21 髋(21/26,80.8%)培养阳性,15 髋(15/26,57.7%)培养出葡萄球菌,5 髋(5/26,19.2%)为混合感染。有 1 例(3.8%)发生间隔器脱位,2 例(7.7%)发生间隔器骨折。1 例患者在二期翻修后 5 年发生急性 PJI,故患者的总体成功率为 96.2%。第一期和第二期的 Paprosky 分类差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。髋关节 Harris 评分由 40.9±14.0 提高至 81.2±11.2(p<0.05)。

结论

强化抗生素骨水泥间隔器治疗髋臼骨缺损 PJI 患者可获得满意的临床效果,提供关节活动度,增加关节稳定性,减少髋臼磨损引起的医源性骨缺损。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/469f95d6a81e/13018_2020_1831_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/141db4547459/13018_2020_1831_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/731eb4d368a3/13018_2020_1831_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/b41324afa896/13018_2020_1831_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/b7fa8525e2c2/13018_2020_1831_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/469f95d6a81e/13018_2020_1831_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/141db4547459/13018_2020_1831_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/731eb4d368a3/13018_2020_1831_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/b41324afa896/13018_2020_1831_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/b7fa8525e2c2/13018_2020_1831_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e8/7528588/469f95d6a81e/13018_2020_1831_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The use of augmented antibiotic-loaded cement spacer in periprosthetic joint infection patients with acetabular bone defect.在伴有髋臼骨缺损的人工关节感染患者中使用载抗生素骨水泥间隔器。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 1;15(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01831-2.
2
The results of screw augmentation of acetabular cement spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic hip joint infection.髋臼水泥间隔物螺钉增强治疗人工髋关节置换术后感染的结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 29;15(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01950-w.
3
The Influence of Spacer Design on the Rate of Complications in Two-Stage Revision Hip Arthroplasty.间隔物设计对两阶段翻修髋关节置换术并发症发生率的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Screw augmented cement spacer for deficient acetabulum in periprosthetic infection following Total Hip Arthroplasty.螺钉增强型水泥间隔器在全髋关节置换术后假体周围感染中治疗髋臼骨缺损
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Oct;108(6):103041. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103041. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
5
[ANTIBIOTIC-IMPREGNATED ARTICULAR CEMENT SPACER FOR TREATMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION].用于治疗人工关节周围感染的抗生素骨水泥间隔物
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;29(4):420-5.
6
Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Specific Articulating Antibiotic Spacer Design: Reliable Periprosthetic Joint Infection Eradication and Functional Improvement.两阶段翻修全髋关节置换术结合特定活动型抗生素间隔物设计:可靠的假体周围关节感染清除和功能改善。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3746-3753. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
7
Staged Revision With Antibiotic Spacers for Shoulder Prosthetic Joint Infections Yields High Infection Control.使用抗生素间隔物分期翻修治疗肩关节人工关节感染可有效控制感染。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):146-152. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000049.
8
The Use of a Supra-Acetabular Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Shelf to Improve Hip Stability in First-Stage Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty.使用髋臼上载抗生素骨水泥托来改善一期感染性全髋关节置换术中的髋关节稳定性。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2574-2578. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
9
Acetabular spacers in 2-stage hip revision: is it worth it? A single-centre retrospective study.两期髋关节翻修术中的髋臼间隔器:值得使用吗?一项单中心回顾性研究。
Hip Int. 2017 Mar 31;27(2):187-192. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000446. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
10
Destination Joint Spacers: A Similar Infection-Relief Rate But Higher Complication Rate Compared with Two-Stage Revision.目的关节间隔物:与两阶段翻修相比,具有相似的感染缓解率但并发症发生率更高。
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):884-891. doi: 10.1111/os.12996. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
'Hybrid' spacers in two-stage total hip arthroplasty revision: surgical technique, clinical and radiographic outcomes.两阶段全髋关节置换翻修术中的“混合”间隔器:手术技术、临床及影像学结果
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 May 26;145(1):318. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05934-5.
2
Fracture-Related Infection in Bicolumnar Acetabular Fracture: A Case Report.双柱髋臼骨折相关感染:一例报告
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 13;12(10):2476. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102476.
3
Cure rate of infections is not an argument for spacer in two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip.

本文引用的文献

1
Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A randomized controlled trial with two years follow-up.人工关节置换术与非人工关节置换术治疗移位型股骨颈骨折:一项为期两年随访的随机对照试验
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Jan;54(1):83-88. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.01.432.
2
Enhancing biology and providing structural support for acetabular reconstruction in single-stage revision for infection.增强生物学特性并为感染一期翻修中的髋臼重建提供结构支撑。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2019 Jun 24;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0530-6.
3
Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip in patients with a femoral neck fracture: a comparison of two modern stem design implants.
感染治愈率并不是髋关节二期翻修术中使用间隔器的理由。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):2199-2207. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04463-9. Epub 2022 May 9.
股骨颈骨折患者行骨水泥型与非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术:两种现代柄部设计植入物的比较
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Oct;28(7):1305-1312. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2202-2. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
One-Stage Revision for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty.感染性全髋关节置换术的一期翻修
Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Jan;47(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.08.004.
5
Mechanical complications with one hundred and thirty eight (antibiotic-laden) cement spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty.138个(含抗生素)骨水泥间隔物在全髋关节置换术后假体周围感染治疗中的机械并发症
Int Orthop. 2015 May;39(5):989-94. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2636-z. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
6
Prosthetic joint infections.人工关节感染
Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Dec;94(6):1265-81. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
7
Dislocation of preformed antibiotic-loaded cement spacers (Spacer-G): etiological factors and clinical prognosis.预制抗生素骨水泥间隔物(Spacer-G)脱位:病因及临床预后
J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):883-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
8
Perioperative complications after cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty in hip fracture patients.髋关节骨折患者行骨水泥型或非骨水泥型人工半髋关节置换术后的围手术期并发症。
Scand J Surg. 2013;102(2):124-8. doi: 10.1177/1457496913482249.
9
Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.髋关节置换术后的慢性感染:比较一期和二期翻修后再次感染的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:57-73. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S29025. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
10
New definition for periprosthetic joint infection.人工关节周围感染的新定义。
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1136-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.09.026.