• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染治愈率并不是髋关节二期翻修术中使用间隔器的理由。

Cure rate of infections is not an argument for spacer in two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Charité, University Hospital Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):2199-2207. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04463-9. Epub 2022 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-022-04463-9
PMID:35534712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10030410/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Most frequently spacers (Sp) with or without antibiotics are implanted in a two-stage procedure even though not always indicated due to unknown pathogen, femoral and acetabular defects or muscular insufficiency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was conducted, analyzing the treatment of 44 consecutive cases with chronic PJI undergoing two-stage revision using a Girdlestone situation (GS) in the interim period between 01/2015 and 12/2018. Diagnostics included intraoperative microbiological cultures, histological analysis, sonication of the initial implant, analysis of hip aspiration, as well as laboratory diagnostics and blood cultures. We analyzed the general and age-group-specific success rate of treatment using GS. Furthermore, we compared our data with the current literature on spacer implantation regarding common complications.

RESULTS

In total, 21 female and 23 male patients at a mean age of 59.3 ± 9.6 years were included. Age groups were divided into young, mid-age, and elderly. In most patients, microbiology revealed Staphylococcus epidermidis in 39.1% of cases, following Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Staphylococcus aureus in 10.9% after THA explantation. For histology, Krenn and Morawietz type 2 (infectious type) was diagnosed in 40.9%, type 3 (infectious and abrade-induced type) in 25.0%. With GS, the total cure rate was 84.1% compared to 90.1% (range 61-100%) using Sp as described in the literature. Among age-groups, cure rate varied between 77.8 and 100%. Other complications, which only occurred in the mid-age and elderly group, included the necessity of transfusion in 31.1%, and in total, one periprosthetic fracture was identified (2.3%).

CONCLUSION

GS shows an acceptable cure rate at a minimum of 2 years when compared to the cure rate reported in the literature for Sp without major complications. For patients with increased risks for treatment failure using spacer, GS seems to be an alternative for chronic PJI when looking at the success rate of treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective trial.

摘要

引言

全髋关节置换术后(THA)的一种毁灭性并发症是慢性假体周围关节感染(PJI)。即使由于未知病原体、股骨和髋臼缺陷或肌肉不足等原因并非总是需要,大多数情况下仍会在两期手术中植入间隔物(Sp),同时使用或不使用抗生素。

材料和方法

对 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间采用 Girdlestone 术(GS)治疗 44 例慢性 PJI 连续性病例的前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。诊断包括术中微生物培养、组织学分析、初次植入物的超声检查、髋关节抽吸分析,以及实验室诊断和血液培养。我们使用 GS 分析 GS 治疗的总体和年龄组特定成功率。此外,我们将我们的数据与关于 Sp 植入的当前文献中的数据进行比较,以了解常见并发症。

结果

共纳入 21 名女性和 23 名男性患者,平均年龄为 59.3±9.6 岁。年龄组分为年轻、中年和老年。在大多数患者中,微生物学显示表皮葡萄球菌在 39.1%的病例中,THA 取出后紧随其后的是路邓葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌分别为 10.9%。组织学方面,Krenn 和 Morawietz 2 型(感染型)诊断为 40.9%,3 型(感染和磨损诱导型)为 25.0%。使用 GS,总治愈率为 84.1%,而文献中描述的 Sp 为 90.1%(范围为 61-100%)。在年龄组中,治愈率在 77.8%至 100%之间变化。仅在中年和老年组中发生的其他并发症包括 31.1%需要输血,总共有 1 例假体周围骨折(2.3%)。

结论

与文献中报道的 Sp 治疗慢性 PJI 的治愈率相比,GS 在至少 2 年时具有可接受的治愈率,且无重大并发症。对于使用 Sp 治疗失败风险增加的患者,当考虑治疗成功率时,GS 似乎是慢性 PJI 的替代方法。

证据水平

III,回顾性试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a13/10030410/443a689ab91b/402_2022_4463_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a13/10030410/443a689ab91b/402_2022_4463_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a13/10030410/443a689ab91b/402_2022_4463_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cure rate of infections is not an argument for spacer in two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip.感染治愈率并不是髋关节二期翻修术中使用间隔器的理由。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):2199-2207. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04463-9. Epub 2022 May 9.
2
The Influence of Spacer Design on the Rate of Complications in Two-Stage Revision Hip Arthroplasty.间隔物设计对两阶段翻修髋关节置换术并发症发生率的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
3
Two-stage hip revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection without the use of spacer or cemented implants.两阶段髋关节翻修术治疗人工关节周围感染,不使用间隔物或水泥固定植入物。
Int Orthop. 2019 Nov;43(11):2457-2466. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04297-y. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
4
Single-stage total hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of proximal femoral fractures: an increased risk for periprosthetic joint infections?一期全髋关节置换术治疗股骨近端骨折固定失败:假体周围关节感染风险增加?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2911-2917. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04119-0. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
5
Long-term clinical outcome of two-stage revision surgery for infected hip arthroplasty using cement spacer: Culture negative versus culture positive.使用骨水泥间隔物的感染性髋关节置换二期翻修手术的长期临床结果:培养阴性与培养阳性对比。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499017754095. doi: 10.1177/2309499017754095.
6
Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Specific Articulating Antibiotic Spacer Design: Reliable Periprosthetic Joint Infection Eradication and Functional Improvement.两阶段翻修全髋关节置换术结合特定活动型抗生素间隔物设计:可靠的假体周围关节感染清除和功能改善。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3746-3753. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
7
Preliminary results of a novel spacer technique in the management of septic revision hip arthroplasty.一种新型间隔器技术在处理感染性髋关节翻修术中的初步结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Nov;138(11):1617-1622. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3038-2. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
8
The results of screw augmentation of acetabular cement spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic hip joint infection.髋臼水泥间隔物螺钉增强治疗人工髋关节置换术后感染的结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 29;15(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01950-w.
9
Complications with cement spacers in 2-stage treatment of periprosthetic joint infection on total hip replacement.髋关节置换翻修术二期治疗中骨水泥间隔器相关并发症:假体周围关节感染。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 May;104(3):333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.016. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
10
[Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Infection of the Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Comparison of Two Methods].[全髋关节置换术后假体周围感染的两阶段翻修术:两种方法的比较]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(3):179-185.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term clinical effect of total hip replacement in the treatment of sequelae of septic arthritis of the hip: A retrospective study.全髋关节置换术治疗髋关节化脓性关节炎后遗症的短期临床疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 11;104(28):e43269. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043269.
2
Mouldable Collagen-Tricalciumphosphate Is a Safe Carrier for Local Antibiotics-Short-Term Results in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.可塑形胶原-磷酸三钙是局部抗生素的安全载体——髋关节翻修术的短期结果
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 May 30;13(6):510. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060510.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life, infection control, and complication rates using a novel custom-made articulating hip spacer during two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection.在二期翻修治疗人工关节周围感染中使用新型定制可活动髋关节 spacer 时的生活质量、感染控制和并发症发生率。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):4041-4054. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04274-4. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
2
New Technique for Custom-Made Spacers in Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties.全髋关节置换术感染性二期翻修中定制间隔物的新技术
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Sep 4;10(9):1073. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091073.
3
Management of peri-prosthetic joint infection and severe bone loss after total hip arthroplasty using a long-stemmed cemented custom-made articulating spacer (CUMARS).
使用长柄骨水泥定制关节间隔器(CUMARS)治疗全髋关节置换术后假体周围感染和严重骨丢失
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 16;22(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04237-1.
4
Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Without Spacer Placement: A Viable Option to Manage Infection in Patients With Severe Bone Loss or Abductor Deficiency.两阶段翻修全髋关节置换术不放置间隔物:一种可行的选择,可用于治疗严重骨质流失或外展肌缺陷的感染患者。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2575-2585. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.040. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
Randomized Trial of Static and Articulating Spacers for Treatment of the Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty.随机对照试验:静态和活动间隔物治疗感染性全髋关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):2171-2177. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.031. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Improved patient reported outcomes with functional articulating spacers in two-stage revision of the infected hip.在感染性髋关节二期翻修术中使用功能性活动间隔器可改善患者报告的结局。
World J Orthop. 2020 Dec 18;11(12):595-605. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i12.595.
7
Comparing the use of preformed vs hand-made antibiotic spacer cement in two stages revision of hip periprosthetic infection.比较预制抗生素间隔骨水泥与手工制作抗生素间隔骨水泥在髋关节假体周围感染二期翻修中的应用。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Oct;11(Suppl 5):S772-S778. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
8
The use of augmented antibiotic-loaded cement spacer in periprosthetic joint infection patients with acetabular bone defect.在伴有髋臼骨缺损的人工关节感染患者中使用载抗生素骨水泥间隔器。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 1;15(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01831-2.
9
Two-stage revision arthroplasty in the treatment of periprosthetic hip infections with severe bone loss: Results from 182 cases.两阶段翻修关节成形术治疗伴有严重骨丢失的人工髋关节感染:182例病例结果
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020 Aug 6;12(2):8545. doi: 10.4081/or.2020.8545.
10
Periprosthetic hip infection treated with two-stage stage-one Select Spacer- complication rate and restoration of anatomy.采用两阶段一期选择性间隔器治疗人工髋关节周围感染——并发症发生率及解剖结构恢复情况
J Orthop. 2019 Sep 11;18:138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.016. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.