Krapf Sandra, Wagner Michael
Mannheim Center for European Social Research, University of Mannheim, 68159 Mannheim, Germany.
Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany.
Eur J Popul. 2020 Jan 10;36(4):735-764. doi: 10.1007/s10680-019-09549-6. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Housing is an important dimension of social inequality between couples, but it has been largely ignored in prior research on union dissolution. Extending the literature that controlled for the stabilizing effect of homeownership, we investigate whether housing, measured as household density, housing tenure and housing affordability, is related to the risk of union dissolution. Based on data from the German Family Panel (pairfam), we analyze 3441 coresidential partnerships. We run discrete-time event-history models to assess the risk of separation within a time frame of 7 years. Housing affordability is found to be negatively related to the risk of union dissolution among couples, as those couples with a high residual income (i.e., household income after deducting housing costs) were less likely to separate than those with a lower residual income. By contrast, household density is found to be unrelated to separation. In line with previous research, our findings indicate that homeowners had more stable relationships than tenants. The analysis shows that this was the case regardless of whether the home was jointly owned or was owned by one partner only.
住房是夫妻间社会不平等的一个重要方面,但在先前关于婚姻关系解体的研究中,它在很大程度上被忽视了。在控制了住房所有权稳定作用的文献基础上,我们研究了以家庭密度、住房 tenure(此处可能是“保有形式”之类的专业术语,原文未明确)和住房可负担性衡量的住房情况是否与婚姻关系解体风险相关。基于德国家庭小组(pairfam)的数据,我们分析了3441个共同居住的伴侣关系。我们运行离散时间事件史模型来评估7年时间框架内的分居风险。研究发现,住房可负担性与夫妻间婚姻关系解体风险呈负相关,因为那些剩余收入高(即扣除住房成本后的家庭收入)的夫妻比分居剩余收入低的夫妻更不容易分居。相比之下,家庭密度与分居无关。与先前研究一致,我们的研究结果表明,自有住房者的关系比租房者更稳定。分析表明,无论住房是夫妻共同拥有还是仅由一方伴侣拥有,情况都是如此。