Zavisca Jane R, Gerber Theodore P
University of Arizona.
University of Wisconsin.
Annu Rev Sociol. 2016 Jul;42:347-367. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074333. Epub 2016 May 23.
Few sociologists treat housing as a key independent variable, despite the emergence of disparate bodies of research analyzing how housing affects outcomes that traditionally interest sociologists. Scholars across the social sciences have proposed and tested mechanisms whereby housing could shape subjective wellbeing, socioeconomic status, demography, and politics. We review the evidence for causal effects across these domains. Next, we make recommendations for research designs to advance this literature. Most studies only test effects of homeownership, and most are focused on the United States and Western Europe. The evidence for causation is often weak, although studies increasingly employ complex techniques for identifying effects. Throughout, we emphasize studies beyond the United States, and we conclude by discussing distinctive insights yielded by comparative research. We advocate for a comparative perspective and more expansive conceptualization of housing status as a means to build theory and evidence regarding the conditions under which housing exerts effects.
尽管出现了不同的研究群体,分析住房如何影响那些传统上为社会学家所关注的结果,但很少有社会学家将住房视为关键的独立变量。社会科学领域的学者们已经提出并检验了住房可能塑造主观幸福感、社会经济地位、人口统计学和政治的机制。我们回顾了这些领域因果效应的证据。接下来,我们对推进这一文献的研究设计提出建议。大多数研究只测试了自有住房的影响,而且大多数研究集中在美国和西欧。因果关系的证据往往很薄弱,尽管研究越来越多地采用复杂的技术来识别影响。在整个过程中,我们强调美国以外的研究,并通过讨论比较研究产生的独特见解来得出结论。我们主张采用比较视角,并对住房状况进行更广泛的概念化,以此作为构建有关住房发挥作用条件的理论和证据的一种手段。